Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



August 30, 2023

Archie & Veronica & Betty & Jughead became a quad, reveals 86-year-old Betty on "Riverdale." And other polyamory in the news.


The core four: Archie (reading a feeling-filled poem), Veronica, Betty, and Jughead in Riverdale.
Not just best friends forever, but a poly quad for their high school senior year, 1956-57.

● Yes, Riverdale went there.  Finally.  In its very last episode.  The reverberations across the media continue. 

When the Riverdale series launched in 2017, many fans of the Archie comics — those icons of American teenhood since 1947 — dismissed it as an exploitive gimmick. But in the course of its 137 episodes, the series won many of them over and made masses of new fans.

For decades, many of us poly-minded people chafed at the permanent, endless romantic-triangle tension between Archie, Veronica, and Betty, and sometimes Reggie or nonchalant Jughead. Sheesh, why can't they just go poly? Love triangling aside, they all seemed to be such good friends together.

Incongruously so, it seemed to me even as a kid. No other love triangles in pop culture (or serious literature that I'd heard of) were so all-around friendly as a group. The Riverdale TV series teased the idea of polyamory among the characters as early as the pilot episode, and some fans kept urging it, but the series never got serious about it.

Until now. The emotional finale of Riverdale's seventh and last season, all heartstrings and weird timeloops, aired Wednesday August 23, and within hours its big reveal was making waves all across pop-culture media — from Cosmopolitan and Teen Vogue to USA Today and the website of NBC's Today Show.

"Riverdale was a show that celebrated its chaos and knew exactly what its fans wanted," wrote Rachel Leishman in The Mary Sue (Aug. 24). The poly quad? "Frankly? That’s what we always wanted! Everyone just kissing, and they even showed fans Veronica and Betty in love with each other. It was brief but at least the show finally acknowledged what fans had wanted from the start of it all."



By Emily Longeretta

...In the show’s final episode, the teen drama jumps ahead 67 years. ... Since Betty’s memory is failing [at age 86], she’s excited by the chance to recall what happened to each of her high school friends, although she knows it may be a painful journey since it means saying goodbye all over again.

Throughout the day, Jughead informs her what happened to everyone after graduation — and a bit about what was happening behind closed doors. Betty is reminded that she, Jughead, Archie and Veronica were in a quad relationship with each other for a year [as high school seniors], with all four of them agreeably intermingling and swapping who they were romantic with each night.




By Kelly Martinez

...Then came perhaps the most shocking reveal of the episode. Remember the famous love triangle between Archie, Betty, and Veronica, and how the show made that even more complicated by adding Betty and Jughead and, most recently, Veronica and Jughead? Well, the core four turned into the core foursome. Yes, Riverdale actually went there.

"Turns out, after Angel Tabitha's last visit, I remembered what it was like being with Jughead — and being with Archie," Betty confided to Reggie. "And Archie and Veronica remembered what it was like being with each other. But Veronica and Jughead had just started a thing. And remembering all of that sort of, just, took the pressure off us having to make a single choice."

"So the four of us realized that we could, and maybe should, just be — together. At the same time," she continued as Reggie bugged his eyes out. "Some nights Archie would sneak into my bedroom and Veronica would go home with Jughead. Other nights, Archie would spend the night at the Pembrooke and I'd go over to Jughead's. And sometimes, more often than you'd imagine, I would find my way to Veronica's."


Smiling fondly at the memories, Betty continues, "It started innocently enough, with the four of us going on double dates... and then it kind of naturally evolved from there." A later scene highlights the emotional depth of the group's togetherness.



By Kate Bove

Many storylines in the Archie Comics hinge on the question of who all-American teen Archie Andrews will choose: Betty or Veronica. ... Much like comic book readers, viewers are split into different camps, which makes the stakes surrounding Riverdale's endgame pairings all the higher. The problem, of course, is that there's no way to appease every [fan]. However, Riverdale pulls off a fairly brilliant twist for the core four, all while ensuring that other fan-favorite pairings stick.

...Riverdale resolves the classic Archie Comics' dilemma by revealing that the four leads are in a polyamorous "quad."... It's a wonderful, fun twist that, honestly, should've come sooner. 


The quad lasted for over a year, the ghostly, elderly-not-elderly Jughead reminisces to Betty, before the whole high-school crowd drifted apart forever.

See more coverage of the finale all over the place. For me, who hadn't been watching the series, the most moving (and explanatory) piece I've come across is this one on Vulture, the culture branch of New York magazine: Riverdale’s Series Finale Explained to the Best of Human Ability, by Rebecca Alter (Aug. 24).

You can watch the episode here, for free, on The CW network.

Commemorative stamp issued by
the US Postal Service in 2010
  
Added later: Some media are now quoting Brett Chamberlin, director of OPEN (Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy), sounding a critical note:


"It's frustrating that Riverdale used its characters' non-monogamous relationship as a 'shocking twist' rather than engaging with an authentic portrayal of non-monogamy as simply being part of people's identities."

Chamberlin continues, "We didn't see or hear anything about why these characters practice non-monogamy, what it means for them, the substance of their relationship agreements and communication practices, or any of the other underlying motivations and work that makes relationships of any type function."


Maybe a bit harsh considering the finale's overwhelming syrupy sweetness ("Gonna give us the weepies?" cracks Reggie as the show writers go self-referential). But those points are worth making; if the relationship was there, previous episodes should have at least touched on them.


And in the real world, a piece of graphic evidence.  A late friend of ours, who lived in a decades-old poly household, was a serious collector of old comics and pop art. He owned quite a few artists' original pen and ink drawings for classic newspaper comic strips. He showed us what he said was a very valuable piece: an original drawing by the definitive Archie artist, Dan DeCarlo, of Betty and Veronica happily cavorting naked with each other in the shower. It's not really porny, but one of them is full frontal and they are being ridiculously playful together.

[NOTE: In an earlier version I incorrectly said the artist was Bob Montana, who did the Archie newspaper strip.]

DeCarlo (1919-2001) drew it as a gift to a friend, we were told. It now resides in a bank vault awaiting sale by the owner's heirs. Whatever it was worth before, its value has surely jumped in the last week.

Dan DeCarlo self-portrait
Yes, DeCarlo was a guy of that era drawing risqué art for a friend. Nevertheless he defined the Archie Comics characters as we know them. If viewers are upset that the Riverdale reveal doesn't match the creator's ideas of  Archieworld — as some grumps are writing in the New York Post and USA Today — point them here.

Maybe it's a sign that DeCarlo wanted to take the characters' relationships further. He did draw them remarkably friendly for love triangles... but these were kids' comics. He drew them as such for 40 years. 

No, I did not take a photo of it.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Turning to other poly in the media,

●  Crappy-poly callout. Good on GQ Magazine UK for saying this: People are using polyamory as a cover for shady behaviour. Welcome to the age of polyscammery (July 31)



By Brit Dawson

...But soon it all started to fall apart. “There weren’t any clear rules or boundaries with either of them, which, in retrospect, was a pitfall,” she reflects. ...

He’d behave in thoughtless or even nasty ways, like being hot and cold, demanding everything be on his terms, or being dismissive of her feelings. Although these are hallmarks of a typically unhealthy relationship, Anna says “his rationale for justifying his behaviour was almost always rooted in the more theoretical aspects of polyamory”, which made her doubt the way she was feeling. Eventually, Michael’s behaviour became the subject of an intervention by his friends, who revealed that many women in the poly community had said they’d had bad experiences with him, too.

“Because polyamory is so new for many people, there’s a risk of not being sure if the behaviours you’re seeing are genuinely not okay,” says Anna, “or just seem not okay because you don’t ‘get’ polyamory yet.”

Anna isn’t alone... some people are getting it all wrong, intentionally or not. This might manifest as someone using the guise of consensual non-monogamy to be deceitful, enforce double standards, or just get away with bad dating behaviour. 

“There are a lot of people who’ll take advantage [of what consensual non-monogamy can offer, but some] are making assumptions that they can do polyamory without doing the research,” says psychotherapist Lesley Charles.... “You’ve got to be really anchored in knowing why you’re doing this, otherwise it’s just self-harm.”

...“There’s a real distinction to draw between people who respectfully engage with their partners in polyamory, and sexual anarchy,” says 26-year-old Cass from London, who’s been polyamorous for four years. “Polyamory is more of a spiritual thing...."

...“Now people have access to the terminology, they can dress up their unfaithfulness in this impenetrable language," [Cass] says. “It’s easy to disguise shitty behaviour as the other person not understanding the dynamic of it all.”

...Still, Anna says it hasn’t shaken her faith in the radical positives of polyamory. “The possibilities are so exciting: more freedom, intimacy, and communication, in ways that we couldn’t imagine in monogamy,” she says. “But perhaps we have a tendency to try to have all of that too quickly without considering the time and effort it may take to thrive in what poly really is. If you rush that, you might get burned.”


Read the whole article, and pass it around.




“I’m in a relationship,” he said. “An open relationship and we’re polyamorous.”

I must have dimmed.

“But I might not be in a few weeks, who knows,” he said, “it’s always changing.”

I’d been reading a lot about polyamory and agreed with most of its core ideas. ...



● The Age of AI Chaos crashes in. Google Alerts found me a nice, respectable Poly 101 article posted by Nao Medical, a chain of urgent care clinics in New York City. The article was bland but thoughtful, with fewer misconceptions than some. I was going to mention it here.

Then TIME magazine published this:




...Most people are probably not looking to urgent care websites for an explanation of what happens when unicorns [the mythical-horse kind] consume ketamine.

But that—and millions of other pages about things that don’t make much sense—have suddenly been popping up on the website of a New York City-based urgent care clinic called Nao Medical. The company, which says it has 16 locations in New York City and Long Island, appears to be using AI to generate a vast flood of well-written and sensibly structured—but not particularly accurate—posts about popular topics in an effort to rank higher on Google.

One post on Nao Medical’s website discusses a medical condition it calls “Derek Jeter Herpes Tree,” which is not actually a medical condition.... Google just about anything you can think of and “Nao Medical” and you will find a long list of posts.


So I googled NaoMedical polyamory and up popped two dozen original poly articles at naomedical.com, some of them deceptively competent, each with a different engaging title.

Poly flag heart: a symptom of what?


From one little company, click-garbage by the freighter load. No wonder Google search results are getting worse. I'll never see bland articles on a trending topic the same way again. Neither should you. 
 

●  Back to the real world (I hope). Another big glossary of polyworld terms appeared, again large but incomplete: A Field Guide to the Many Forms of Ethical Non-Monogamy (InsideHook, Aug. 7)


...Most popular depictions of ENM have been — and remain — narrow and problematic. ... Recent coverage of ENM... still tends to focus on “triads with two bisexual women and one man” who’re all in relationships with each other but not with anyone else, notes Leanne Yau, the founder of Poly Philia, an ENM education and content hub. “In reality, that’s a very small percentage of the polyamorous community.” 

...Says Morgan K, “If someone tells me they’re non-monogamous, that prompts me to ask several dozen more questions before I can understand what that even means for them.”

...We reached out to about a dozen well-known and highly experienced ENM practitioners and educators, and pored over a dozen ENM guides and resource hubs to ensure [these definitions are] as accurate and nuanced as possible while still being accessible to complete ENM outsiders. ...


The terms described, sometimes carefully and at length, are Hierarchical Polyamory, Non-hierarchical Polyamory, Solo Polyamory, Polyfidelity, Polygamy, Open Relationships, Monogamish, Casual Dating, Friends with Benefits, Relationship Anarchy, Ambiamorous, Polycule, Comet, Polysaturation, Metamours and Telemours; Parallel, Garden Party and Kitchen Table Polyamory/Non-monogamy; Anchor Partner, Nesting Partner; Unicorns and Unicorn Hunters, Monocorn ("a term for a monogamous person who’s open to dating a non-monogamous person"), Cowboy/Cowgirl/Cowpoke, and Troller ("people who join ENM circles, or present themselves as thoughtful non-monogamy practitioners, but are just looking for strings-free sex.") Yet it only partially overlaps that glossary mentioned in my last post.


●  How to get started with non-monogamy (Mashable, Aug. 15) Good advice collected from Dedeker Winston, Effy Blue, and therapist Nicoletta Heidegger (of the Sluts & Scholars podcast).


By Anna Iovine

..."The reality is, it's a lot more talking than sex at the end of the day," said Dedeker Winston, co-host of the Multiamory podcast and co-author of Multiamory: Essential Tools for Modern Relationships. "Talking supports good sex and sometimes lots of good sex but…the barrier to entry can be high, especially in particular, if you're opening up from a monogamous relationship.

"The first step is a lot of self inquiry and research," said Winston. 

..."Obviously, insecurities and feelings come up in monogamy," said Heidegger. "But in non-monogamy, you can't really hide from them as much as you can in traditional monogamy."...



●  In the lesbian GO Magazine ("the cultural roadmap for city girls everywhere"): Poly Sapphic Nomads Find Their Home On The Island Of Lesbos (Aug. 24). It's a breezy travel piece about an FFMtF triad on a sailboat sailing the world's breezes into an Aegean port positively made for them.


By Clare Hand

Queer women have been making their way to Eressos, a village on the Greek island of Lesvos, for over half a century. As the birthplace of Sappho, the village has become a place of pilgrimage for Sapphics; some holiday for a few weeks, others settle for a few decades. All are infatuated by the sense of safety, community and the breathtaking combination of sand, sea and spotless blue skies. 

The Rainbow's Tribe triad
The Rainbow's Tribe

The arrival of the Rainbow’s Tribe, a polyamorous throuple – though they prefer ‘family’ to ‘throuple’  – Elizabeth, Cristina and Davi, sent tremors of excitement through Sappho’s hometown. They’d been living on a sailboat for five years and planned to make their way around the world. From the moment they docked, they’ve become an unmissable presence here – not because they waltz down the promenade hand-in-hand-in-hand – but because they bring a necessary dose of vibrancy and queerness to the community. They’re writers, academics and translators, each adorned in tattoos, with hair dyed every shade of turquoise and blue found in the Aegean Sea. It’s unclear who’s happier to have found the other– Eressos or the Rainbow’s Tribe. 

...As they sailed to the island, they listened to a podcast, I’ll Never be Alone Anymore: The Story of the Skala Eressos Lesbian Community. “All of us had tears in our eyes,” says Davi, a 46-year-old transwoman born in Libya, “like what the fuck is this place? Of course we knew Sappho in the broadest terms, but we had no idea that there was a living community here.” 

They landed in September last year, when the International Women’s Festival was at its zenith and there were queer women as far as the eye could see. ...In less than a year, the Rainbow’s Tribe have fully rooted their lives into Eressian soil. ...

The lovebirds have palpable chemistry. As we sit in a café on the seashore, they seamlessly bounce jokes and ideas off each other like they’re playing bat and ball in the sand. Their love story began with Davi and Elizabeth almost two decades ago at a writing competition in Colorado. ...



●  Slate magazine's "How To Do It" sex advice column takes a question from a swing-ish couple with rules: My Husband and I Usually Date Women Together. Now He Has a New Plan (Aug. 6)
"I’m not sure we’re on the same page about this." ...


Dear How to Do It, 

My husband and I have been married for 11 years. For most of that time, we’d frequently invite other women into our marriage and bed. ... It’s been a little over three years since our last playdate, coinciding with the pregnancy and birth of our youngest child.

Recently, my husband introduced me to a friend of his and suggested she be our new “date.” Our sex life is healthy and fun, but I’m not quite in the mood for extra entertainment right now. I’m tired from chasing a toddler and working full time. Thus, we’re juggling the idea of him pursuing this relationship on his own, and I’m open to the idea. She is as well.

How do we do this? In the past, it’s been more like a “throuple” situation. We all communicated, were all on the same page, and were all very comfortable. But this is just a him-and-I vs. him-and-her situation. How do I navigate this? ...

—Sitting This One Out ....



More from India: In MensXP, "India's Largest Men’s Lifestyle Destination," Is Monogamy Losing Its Relevance In Today’s Generation? (Aug. 6)


...From genuinely believing in the concept of true love to having my heart broken, trampled upon and crushed for pieces, I was forced to revisit a few concepts that have been ingrained in our minds since time immemorial — like monogamy. ... Perhaps it was this weight of being the provider for so many things [to a partner] that has ultimately led to the visible crumbling of the concept in this 21st century.

...A part of me wonders whether it has been this urge to break free from these set rules and guidelines that instigate the hidden rebel within people our age to cheat. But then the other part of me reminds me, the opposite of monogamy doesn’t have to be cheating, it has to be polyamory. And last I checked polyamory includes telling all your partners about the fact that you’re not exclusive to them. ...



●  More from Kenya: In The Star, a daily newspaper in Nairobi, Love unbound: The soaring popularity of polyamory relationships (Aug. 10)


The topic of Polyamory relationships has become a topic of discussion for those in marriage and the dating scene.

...When I meet Christabel Owino*  at her shop in Nairobi CBD, she is busy engaging her customers and as soon as she is done, Owino grabs two chairs and she ushers me into her shop.

Ready to share her story about polyamory relationships, Owino terms it as something interesting. ...

...Oscar Maina* who has been in a polyamorous relationship for a decade says it's the best decision he made in life.

"As we grow, we develop different feelings and discover we like different things in women, and once you are open about what you want, and very honest with the parties involved, your relationships will thrive," he says. ...

...To be in such relationships, one does not consider it as infidelity as all parties involved are aware of each other — the relationship is disclosed to everyone involved....



●  An interesting first-person piece by a women who tried it and decided no. Love in Plural: the Pros and Cons of Polyamory (The Good Men Project, Aug. 11)


Viewing relationships through a poly lens can grant deeper insight on the roots of insecurity, entitlement, and jealousy.

By Eleni

...Positives:
   1. Helps you rethink the role of jealousy. ...
   2. Strong communication. ...
   3. Practice in mindfulness. ...
   4. Less pressure. ...

...The less ideal aspects:
   1. The question of time. ...
   2. Monogamy seems more efficient. Full cut-off of other options relieves cognitive burden. ... This frees time and brain space. [And] restrictions can help many people feel more grounded. ...



●  Another new book out: Cultivating Connection: a practical guide for personal and relationship growth in ethical non-monogamy, by MtF poly therapist Sander T. Jones. From the introduction: 


After several years as a therapist working with people in non-monogamous relationships, I noticed the greatest confusion for my clients seemed to be around personal boundaries, how to employ them, and how to balance individual needs with the needs of the relationship.

I saw people who gave away almost everything for their relationships and wondered why they still felt unloved and unappreciated. I saw people who felt so guilty asking for or requiring anything from their partners that they twisted themselves into pretzels....

I came up with a list of rights that I believe a person has and must protect in order to remain a healthy individual. I also came up with a way of interacting and speaking that includes respecting each person's human rights, and also fosters bonding and connections in relationships....

This book is my attempt at sharing a complete system for finding and creating that beautiful balance between fostering a healthy self and fostering healthy non-monogamous relationships.

...Cultivating Connection also teaches how to come back together and work as a team to resolve conflicts in a compassionate and collaborative way with easy to understand techniques, relatable real life examples, and tons of practical advice.


Read the first dozen or so pages using the "Look Inside" on the book's Amazon link.

Kitty Chambliss of the Loving Without Boundaries podcast will do a Facebook Live with the author this Thursday, August 31st. 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Meanwhile, as events develop...

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many progressive movements stumble and die out because they failed to scan the wider world accurately and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside of their worldview, we expose its incompleteness.

One couple, many hands. "A new mural painting in Kyiv dedicated
to Ukrainian volunteers. If you have helped Ukrainians during this
year and a half, you may consider yourself to be one of them."

Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Such a society is possible only where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States. Now with direct mutual support.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, abuse of police power, or eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, Polyamory in the News received more pagereads from pre-invasion Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

You can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of vetted organizations or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, the project of an old friend of my wife (story).

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, we are seeing the most consequential war of our lifetime. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional  inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine. The whole world is watching what we will do about it.

The coming times may require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we are born into; we do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Take perspective. Play thisAnother version. More? Some people on the eastern front helping to hold onto an open society, a shrinking thing in the world. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they are doing it for us too. They are correct. The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. It's likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. More; "Ukraine shows that real development happens when people believe they have an ownership stake in their own societies."

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. Learn that word. It's been getting them through  to the extent they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine tend traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. The status of women is fast advancing, especially since February 2022 (pre-invasion article). And a reported 57,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, flooding traditionally male bastions, including as combat officers, artillery gunners, tankers, battlefield medics, and snipers. (Intimidating video: "Thus the Witch has Said".)
  
Ukraine's LGBT military unicorn emblem
Ukraine's LGBT military unicorn.
The thorns and barbed wire
represent old restrictions
now being cut away. 
 
Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, with official approval, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay." A report on Ukraine's current LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutionsAnotherAnotherAnother. War changes things.

And in December 2022, Russia made it a crime not just to speak for LGBT recognition, but to speak for "non-traditional sexual relations." Until last year Russia had a polyamory education and awareness movement.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our continued material aid for however long as it takes to win. Speak out for it.

A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."


Ukrainian women soldiers in dense undergrowth
Women fighters in a trench in the Donetsk region

PPS:  US authoritarians (such as Sen. Ted Cruz) are saying that allowing women in front-line roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Ukraine puts that shit to bed. Do you have a relative who talks like that? Send them this video link to Vidma, who commands a mortar platoon, recounting the tale one of their battles in Bakhmut – the Verdun of this war.

_________________________

 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE

_________________________



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,



August 5, 2023

Polyamory and psychedelics, polyfam finances, the future of relationships — lots of new poly in the media


Zoe Finley / The Kent Stater
No special theme this time, but a grab-bag of polyamory recently in the news all over. Settle in for a browse.  

●  USA Today again. Seems like they've found that polyamory articles are click-winners and they're pumping their staff for more. 'I'm wired differently': What it feels like to be polyamorous and how couples [sic] make it work (June 26). Excerpts:


By David Oliver

..."As a kid, when I had crushes, I always had crushes on multiple people," [says Elise]. ... A TED Talk introduced her to the possibilities a polyamorous life had to offer. "I'm not broken. I'm not a cheater. I'm not this person that has bad morals. I'm literally just wired differently," she says.

Leanne Yau. Watch the brief Insta.

...Remember that polyamorous people don't want to erase monogamy. "The goal is for everyone to know what options they have in relationships and be able to kind of customize and tailor them and be able to honestly express their desires to their partner or partners," says Leanne Yau, polyamory expert.

...Hobson and Wolf, social media stars behind "The Poly Couple," have figured out polyamory as they've gone along. "It feels like it's a never-ending experiment, because it's not really societally accepted yet," Hobson says. They were monogamous for eight years and have spent about the same amount of time now dating other people. They mostly date separately but have gone on dates together, too.

"It's hard enough to fall in love with another person," Hobson says, "let alone both of us fall in love with the same person."

...Because polyamorous people may indeed be having sex with a wider variety of partners, consent and sexual history are discussed regularly and upfront. STI rates for poly couples are the same as monogamous couples, too.

Still, not every connection may turn sexual. Part of what differentiates polyamory from the broader ethical non-monogamy umbrella is an emotional connection.

...Maybe polyamory would work for you and maybe it wouldn't. But just because it's not for you doesn't mean you should disparage the practice, especially without learning about it.





Brazilian OnlyFans stars Bella Mantovani, 31, and Vagner O Fera, 34, have rented a Times Square billboard to promote their polyamorous lifestyle.

“We want to end this stereotype that polyamory is synonymous with being naughty,” O Fera, an ex-preacher [Evangelical] from São Paulo, told NeedToKnow.co.uk. ...



●  Here's one I can identify with: How Psychedelics Helped Me Embrace Polyamory (Psychedelic Spotlight, June 20)


(no credit listed )


















By Gina Giorgio

...My psychedelic experiences, beginning at the age of 22, acted like a mirror to my soul, persistently reflecting my suppressed desires for polyamory. They stripped away societal norms, revealing buried truths, and helping me accept that my interest in non-monogamy didn't make me an immoral person or less worthy partner....

...My more recent psychedelic journeys have continued to further help me comprehend and navigate the complexities of polyamory as a heterosexual woman. On one particular mushroom journey, read more about that one here, a profound realization dawned upon me: The mushrooms told me I was destined to share my life with two people. I was honestly disappointed initially. Part of me always hoped it was a phase I’d grow out of. But rather, it felt like a huge slap in the face that I was being given this information about myself. 

...The process of self-alienation is far more damaging than confronting this truth. I laid down while receiving this mushroom wisdom, and ultimately felt a sense of peace and relief. It was like I could finally stop running from myself, and simply accept something that shouldn’t seem so out there in the first place. ... 

...Taking psychedelics, carefully integrating the takeaways, and coming to terms with my own heart played an instrumental role in this transformative process. They allowed me to open up about my preferences, negotiate the dynamics of my relationships, and reassured me that loving two people didn't devalue either relationship. The cat's now out of the bag, and my hope is to inspire others to be more accepting of their unique romantic partnerships, in whatever form they may take.

This acceptance, akin to embarking on psychedelic journeys, symbolizes freedom – freedom of love, freedom of expression, and most importantly, freedom of choice. Love, in all its diverse forms, should be celebrated. Lord knows the world needs more of it.

A friend wants safety warnings. So: Treat these substances with the respect they deserve; they are not party drugs. Get a test kit to verify what you've got. Avoid if you have a personal or family history of schizophrenia, psychotic breaks, or seizures or have heart disease for which stress is not advised. Read up on psychedelics and what they do, and follow time-tested  guidelines  for safe tripping. Plan a free and clear day; understand that  set and setting are everything; avoid unpredictable or stressful surroundings. Start with a small dose and work up as you learn this new world, leaving at least a week or two between trips.

Have a kind, trusted friend as a guide or tripsitter if you're a beginner or are taking a large dose, if only to keep you from worrying about trouble. A backup resource is the Fireside Project peer-support hotline with trained volunteer tripsitters on call. At medium and large doses, understand that you don't take the trip, the trip takes you. Have a nice place handy to curl up and lie down if you wish. If the experiences get intense don't try to resist them (you can't); instead ride with the flow and experience them; breathe slowly and intentionally; remember that this will pass and you will come out of it fine and perhaps better for it. Remember that when it comes to psychedelics, "Surrender is the key to mastery"; memorize that mantra and repeat when needed. These are my opinions, I am not a doctor and this is not medical advice.



●  We're all getting there eventually: How Polyamorous People Can Find Happiness in Later Life (Greater Good Magazine, June 15). "For polyamorous people generally, what does aging together look like?"


Two recent books try to answer that question. Fifty Years of Polyamory in America, by Glen W. Olson and Terry Lee Brussel-Rogers, is an idiosyncratic, hagiographic history of a movement that tracks organizations, ideas, and individual people over five decades. In Polyamorous Elders, therapist and nurse Kathy Labriola shares dozens and dozens of stories of Baby Boomers wrestling with issues related to retirement, grown children, illness, caring for multiple partners, mourning them, transitioning to senior living facilities, and more.

Both books try to make the life trajectories of outsiders like me visible to ourselves, first and foremost, illuminating the path that all of us must walk, if we’re lucky enough to not die young. 

Relevant: OPEN has just obtained a grant from The Polyamory Foundation to help fund a Polyamory and Deathcare guide and webinar. "OPEN aims to produce a resource to help polyamorous and non-monogamous people navigate end-of-life planning and deathcare, where the hurdles of a world built exclusively around monogamy can be particularly challenging."  Update January 2024: The guide has been produced and is available online: End-of-Life Planning Guide.


●  Practical matters: 6 money management tips for people in polyamorous relationships, from experts who know (Business Insider, June 15). It's serious and pretty long. The ten subsections: 


Four financial challenges of being polyamorous
1. There are many different poly relationship arrangements ...
2. Challenges with odd number of partners involved ...
3. Challenges in the transfer of generational wealth ...
4. Fewer financial literacy resources ...

How to manage money when you're polyamorous
1. Define your ideal financial overlap ...
2. Get in alignment ...
3. Start small ...
4. Keep your beneficiaries up to date ...
5. Make estate planning a priority ...
6. Have money conversations often  ...



●  Speaking of which, remember that long-running poly property mess making national news in New Zealand? It has finally been settled — by the country's highest court no less, in a 3-2 decision: Polyamorous ex-throuple dispute over $2m property leaves Supreme Court split (New Zealand Herald, June 19).

It's a lesson in why any long-term polyfamily should draw up legal agreements about property they own or think they do.  


A panel of Supreme Court judges are at odds over a ruling that a polyamorous ex-throuple are theoretically all entitled to a share of the multi-million dollar property they lived in together.

The ruling passed by a narrow margin, with two of the five judges dissenting, citing concerns with how this precedent could affect future, more complex cases involving multi-partner relationships.

...The case relates to a couple, Lilach and Brett Paul, who married in 1993.

In 1999, Lilach Paul met Fiona Mead and in 2002 the three of them formed a polyamorous relationship.

They moved into a four-hectare property in Kumeu, which had just been purchased in Mead’s name for [NZ]$533,000. She paid the deposit of $40,000.

They lived together at the property for 15 years, and mostly shared the same room and bed, court documents said.

All three worked and contributed to the household until 2017, when Lilach Paul broke up with Mead and Brett Paul, who in turn broke up in 2018, with Mead continuing to live at the property.

The property had by then risen in value to more than $2 million.

In 2019, Lilach Paul applied to the Family Court to determine the parties’ shares in the property, under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA).

Mead protested the Family Court’s jurisdiction to consider the case, and it was referred to the High Court, which ruled there was no jurisdiction. But Lilach and Brett Paul appealed that decision, with the Court of Appeal ruling in 2021 the Family Court did have jurisdiction as the throuple could be defined as three separate, qualifying relationships under the act.

Mead then appealed to the Supreme Court last year.

The home in dispute. (Chris McKeen/ Stuff)
















In the Supreme Court appeal, her lawyer said the Court of Appeal had “undermined and misconstrued the essential nature of their relationship, [which was] a threesome” when it characterised them as being in three separate relationships.

Meanwhile, Lilach Paul’s lawyer said the PRA’s definition of a de facto relationship was “broad, flexible, and evaluative”.

“It is not concerned with how the parties describe themselves but with whether the relationship has the requisite characteristics. In this case, the polyamorous relationship between the parties was comprised of three qualifying relationships.”

There should be no practical impediment to dividing the property equally, so long as there were qualifying relationships.

“Excluding multi-partnered relationships from the definition of a de facto relationship would have serious implications, such as inadvertently ending a marriage once there is involvement of a third party.”...




...In the decision, Justice Stephen Kós pointed to the two-person relationships within the threesome.

"All multilateral relationships are inherently also collections of bilateral relationships. Exact numbers and mechanics are less important, for the act, than the fact that the people comprising the relationships lived together in a marriage, civil union or de facto relationship," he said.

Justices Susan Glazebrooke and Ellen France disagreed with the other judges, saying to divide a polyamorous relationship in this way was artificial. ...


I wonder what the lawyers cost. 


●  Some good newbie advice: The Secrets to Making Non-Monogamy Work, According to a 'Couples Therapy' Expert (Men's Health and Yahoo News, June 28). The expert is Dr. Orna Guralnik, who hosts Showtime's documentary series "Couples Therapy." Sample:


If a couple is thinking about opening up their relationship, do you have any advice?

From my experience working with people who are ethically non-monogamous, people should know it requires a huge amount of attention paid to the relationship. It isn't something you can do impulsively and hope it's going to be okay. If you don't really get into the whole philosophy of it, then people are going to get hurt and it's going to hurt the relationship. It requires serious bandwidth.

In a funny way, people who are doing ethical non-monogamy are way more [connected] than people who don't. It requires so much attention to feelings and impact and assessing oneself, how one is feeling, [and] assessing your partner... [It's about] keeping this process of self-reflection on why are you doing what you are doing [and] parsing out selfishness versus care. It's a lot to think about, so you have to be ready for that. ...





...In the past few years, as the star of ethical non-monogamy (ENM) has risen, so too has the idea that there is one “right” way to be. Polyamorous people love talking about their polyamory in the smoking area and saying things like “Love is not a limited resource!” and, one of my personal faves, “Monogamy is a violent system solely designed to uphold capitalism and the patriarchy.” Meanwhile, monogamous people, who still rule the roost in wider society, often look down on those with alternative relationship styles. “Isn’t that just sanctioned cheating?”...

I now subscribe to a concept I like to call “relationship neutrality”, which is basically the idea that how other people conduct their relationships is none of your business....



●  OnlySky, a secularist news magazine recently bought by the American Atheists, had a correspondent there in the Somerville (MA) City Council room when the council voted last March for its famous nondiscrimination measures. The mag finally published Love is love: Quiet victory may ignite nat’l movement to protect polyamorists (June 16).


● A compersion 101 in the big online magazine Women.com: Compersion, What It Means And How It Ties Into Ethical Non-Monogamy (July 6). Nothing original; it's collected from other online articles.




 Non-monogamy is like CrossFit, in that it has a lexicon all its own. ... With the help of six polyamory educators, we put together a non-monogamy glossary.


The terms are ENM and CNM, polyamory, open relationship, relationship orientation, ambiamorous, swingers, throuple, triad, quad, don't ask don't tell (DADT), hierarchical polyamory, relationship anarchy (RA), anchor partner, comet, metamour, compersion, garden party polyamory, kitchen table polyamory, parallel polyamory, and polysaturated.

They missed family style polyamory, polycule, NRE (new-relationship energy), frubbly, nesting partner, unicorn (and unicorn hunter), vee, N, W, quint, cross-coupled, fluid bonded, OPP, telemour (your metamour's other partner), cowboy/cowgirl, and what else? 



Drawing of three smiling young people sweetly holding each other
 Zoe Finley / The Kent Stater

● In the Kent State student newspaper: Is polyamory the future? The future legality of polyamory in the United States (June 14)


...Mylo said they were currently in a polycule, and each of their boyfriends ... fulfills needs like romance, emotional support, and sexual needs. 

“I find it very healthy, the fact that I don’t demand all my needs be met by one person, because I feel like that’s too much for people to handle sometimes in different parts of life,” Mylo said. 

Said Lee, “A couple of years into college back in 2020, I guess I sort of felt that I just like so many people and feel like my love shouldn’t just be limited to one person.” ... 



●  From Spain, in the leading national newspaper El PaísEverything that polyamory can teach monogamous relationships (English edition, July 8). The long article is mostly a diligent Poly 101, but these parts address the headline:


By Marita Alonso

..."Non-monogamous relationships can involve a greater or lesser degree of openness, priorities and agreements of all kinds," [says therapist and non-mono activist Sandra Bravo.] "In order to be called ethical, they must in all cases include transparency, honesty, consensus and consent. Something that, again, wouldn’t hurt to have in monogamy – in an explicit, spoken way, not only from a tacit agreement made at the beginning of a relationship."

...[Says Noemí Casquet, author of Éxtasis (Ecstasy)], one key aspect is communication, which in non-monogamous relationships has to be open, direct and honest. “Non-monogamous people work on this a lot, because we have deconstructed a lot and we are very aware of what care, bonds and affective responsibility are. This is often not taken into account in monogamy, because there has been no deconstruction of it. Non-monogamous people have had to break with the idea of romantic love, reformulating it from a different place. Communication and quality time are crucial. What can monogamous relationships learn from this? The importance of making a relational agreement establishing a series of issues that sometimes are uncomfortable, but must be discussed.”

...“Monogamous relationships can learn a lot about managing quality time and care. Also about affective responsibility and being aware that we are creating a bond that must be cared for. We have to communicate, be honest, constantly touch base with each other to find out what our emotional state is and to be able to share it, as well as create protocols (for coexistence, communication, arguments) and even put them in writing. Relationships are an agreement between two people, so the clearer that agreement can be, the fewer problems we will have.” 

...Psychologist Lara Ferreiro says that monogamous relationships can learn from polyamorous relationships to adopt an open mind, although she clarifies that this does not imply that they open the relationship if they do not want to; rather, that they experiment in their own sexual relations. “Being open to new sexual experiences helps to break free from monotony, to learn about new tastes and sexual fantasies of the partner and to create an atmosphere of trust. There are couples who have been together for many years and are used to a series of sexual dynamics that don’t satisfy both members. For this reason, relationships should focus on mutual sexual satisfaction, something that is very present in polyamorous relationships. ...

Ferreiro continues: “Another important aspect is the autonomy within the couple. Members of polyamorous relationships highly value personal autonomy and freedom. Although within polyamory this is has to do with having sexual freedom and creating connections with other people, monogamous people can practice it within the couple. This can be reflected in each other’s individual quality time; that is, that each person has their own pastimes and spends time with friends and family outside of the relationship,” she explains. “Monogamous couples can learn to overcome the possessiveness that is often associated with this type of relationships. Polyamory destroys that idea of possession, control and excessive jealousy that we often associate with traditional couples. A monogamous couple should be based on commitment and mutual respect, but it must be emphasized that each person is a separate individual who doesn’t depend on anyone; we don’t belong to someone just because we are in a couple.”

Sandra Bravo adds other important lessons: that friendships are not a consolation prize and that the partner should not be everything. “That is the great message of monogamous, heteropatriarchal romantic love. Interacting in a non-monogamous way does not magically remove this burden from us, but it invites us to question it, which is, without a doubt, one of the most important points: to break the isolation of the couple and generate alternative family and relationship models to relate in a more communal way, where care can be better distributed and not always fall on the same persons”....



From India, Married But Open: Indian Couples Embracing Non-Monogamy Say The More The Merrier (Outlook India, online August 2). That's just one of the polyam and other alternative-relationship articles in Outlook India's "Radical Love" special issue, at left (print date August 11).

Another of its articles: 'I Am Polyamorous': Journey Of Many Desires. "The heart sees beauty, kindness, courage and compassion in more than one person and desires to connect with them."

Also from India, 10 Polyamorous Relationship Rules for Thriving Non-Monogamy (Pinkvilla, June 24). Pinkvilla, a celebrity/entertainment site, claims to be "India’s leading content platform" with a "loyal reader base of 60 million and growing" in 200 countries. The article, by a relationship coach, is entry level but informative for the wide public. Quite long.

India has been producing a lot more poly in the media lately. Another. Some earlier examples.


From Kenya, an outspoken TV star makes news: We don't belong to anyone -- How Nice Githinji balances multiple relationships  (PulseLive, Aug. 3)


In a YouTube interview on Thursday, actress and producer Nice Githinji explained her perspective on open relationship lifestyles and her chosen way of polyamory.

Nice Githinji
...The 'Benta' actress explained ... that human beings tend to adopt a sense of ownership over each other, even within committed relationships. She challenged this notion, asserting that people should not belong to one another.

..."As human beings we are so big in owning people... We don't belong to anyone, even in a relationship we shouldn't belong to each other. Tikidanganyana ndio sababu tunaumizana.  [Lying to each other is why we hurt each other.] The fact that I say you are the only one, then I still go and fool around, hurts people," Githinji said. ...

"If we learn to tailor-make our relationships according to our needs as the people in the relationship, then it goes further than doing things according to how society says they should be done." 



From South Africa via the BBC, South Africa polyamory: When three's not a crowd in a relationship (July 22)


Lethabo (left), Fletcher and Lunya with the baby

















By Mpho Lakaje
BBC Africa Daily, Johannesburg

A new trend appears to be emerging among young South Africans — polyamory — having romantic relationships with multiple partners at the same time.

With her short hair and matching white trousers and top Lethabo Mojalefa cuts a striking figure.

She is a bisexual woman who started dating Fletcher Mojalefa in December 2018.

Fletcher, who equally oozes confidence and charisma, is a flamboyant man often wearing a colourful flowery shirt and a bucket hat.
 
...When they first got together, Fletcher had no idea that Lethabo was bisexual.

"I broke the news two or three months into our relationship because I realised that I could actually be open with this guy," Lethabo says.

Fletcher was fine with it.

"I felt happy that she went public with me and she came out," he says. "If she didn't, we were going to have other secret relationships and we were not going to last."

...In August last year, they met Lunya Makua, a bisexual woman who works as a stripper at a nightclub in the small town of Burgersfort. She too is in her early 20s.

..."In no time we all hooked up. The three of us were sharing the same bed, especially when attending social events and staying at a guest house."

But understanding a polyamorous relationship in Limpopo province, a rural part of South Africa, was always going to prove difficult for the local community.

Lethabo admits that some of their peers still do not get it and often mistake it for polygamy, which is common among some South African communities.

"They ask me how I handle my partner having another partner. I just explain to them that it's not just his partner, I'm dating her too.

"Once people realise that she's my partner too, they start accusing me of being possessed, saying this is not normal," she says, seemingly unfazed by the criticism.

"It doesn't matter to me, I'm conscious of what I am doing and I am aware of the decisions I'm taking."

...Relationship counsellors here say they are now seeing more people involved in polyamory and say that it is more common than expected in South Africa.

From the clients she has seen, intimacy and relationship coach Tracy Jacobs says that while polyamory is on the rise, she has noticed that it is not exclusively among young people.

"Although it does tend to be more popular among the younger generations, such as the millennials and Gen Z, there are also other individuals in older age groups who practise polyamory or other forms of ethical non-monogamy.

"The range of these individuals who identify as polyamorous is quite broad and there's no real clear-cut age," she says.

Intimate relationship counsellor Elizabeth Retief says polyamorous relationships are also more attractive because they offer more flexibility and challenge traditional roles that is very different to polygamy.

"Ethical polyamory is egalitarian, whereas polygamy very much says: 'One person in this relationship has more rights than the other.' " ...

... But how would things change if Lethabo, the mother of his child, brought another man to the relationship?

"I wouldn't be part of that relationship because I'm a straight man. But if she wants to commit to another relationship with a man, that would be OK, " [Fletcher] says. ...



●  And lastly, from the DC Universe: Wonder Woman’s new kid nods to the character’s polyamorous origins. "Meet Elizabeth Marston Prince, aka Wonder Woman" (Polygon, June 26)


Elizabeth Marston Prince.
Her nickname will be Trinity.

By Susana Polo

Writer Tom King and artist Daniel Sampere are the next team taking on [the Wonder Woman comic], and Issue #800 offered a mighty tease of their plan: A story set decades in the future of the DC Universe, featuring Wonder Woman’s daughter, Lizzie.

Why Lizzie? Well, it’s short for Elizabeth — Elizabeth Marston Prince, that is. Prince, from long tradition, is Diana’s chosen surname. But which Marston did Diana Prince partner up with to bring Lizzie into the world? That’s for King and Sampere to know, and us to find out when their run begins on Sept. 19.

But here in the real world, Elizabeth Marston just happens to be the name of one of the polyamorous trio who invented Wonder Woman in the first place.



ANNOUNCEMENTS: 

 Polyamory Conversation Cards kickstarter. These look fun and useful. Marianna Zelichenko writes,

"A project we just launched: Polyamory Conversation Cards! It’s a deck with 49 questions in different categories to help polyam folks discuss important topics early & open."

From their press release:

















The basic card deck consists of 55 cards [including wildcards], with questions and tips for using the cards. If the stretch goal of €40K is reached, the number of cards will be doubled to 110. The cheerful watercolor artwork for the cards is created by Dutch queer & polyamorous artist The Artful Iriz. ...

The questions are divided in 7 categories: Emotional safety, Autonomy vs. sharing, Communication, Relationship structures, Sexuality, Dealing with challenges, and Practical matters. Marianna: “We conducted research in multiple online communities, and these topics were mentioned a lot when we asked people what they wished they discussed earlier on in their relationships.” 


More pix at the link. You get the set of cards for a pledge of 15 euros, about $17. Estimated delivery date November. You're only charged if they reach the goal to manufacture them. (I have no financial interest in this.)


Another kickstarter, this one for people interested in intentional family and shared living ideas: the Nuclear (Family) Fusion app. The project is by Remodeled Love, known on the web for its goal "to expand the cultural narrative on healthy relationships, polyamory, family, and love."


What if the village you always dreamed of was just a click away?

What if the skills you needed to learn on how to have emotionally intelligent and mutually supportive, lasting relationships could be found in that same place?

What if you never had to stress about finding reliable childcare, support for yourself during finals week, or help caring for your elderly parent?

What if there was an app for that?

We at Remodeled Love, a platform dedicated to giving voice to non-traditional family structures, want to create an app that matches folks and families to each other based on shared values, in order to help each other break free from the oppression of single and nuclear family living. 

It will function much like a dating app except it has nothing to do with dating; it serves to unite individuals and families from across the country, and even the globe, who are looking for other families with whom to form geographical villages and/or co-families.


Make a pledge to help create it. I did. You'll be charged only if the Kickstarter reaches its August 20th goal of $14,000 to pay for the app's development. Estimated delivery date March 2024. 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Meanwhile, as events press forward...

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many progressive movements die out because they failed to scan the wider world accurately and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside of their worldview, we expose its incompleteness.

One couple, many hands. "A new mural painting in Kyiv dedicated
to Ukrainian volunteers. If you have helped Ukrainians during this
year and a half, you may consider yourself to be one of them."

Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Such a society is possible only where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States. Now with direct mutual support.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, abuse of police powers, or eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, Polyamory in the News received more pagereads from pre-war Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

You can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of vetted organizations or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, the project of an old friend of my wife (story).

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, we are seeing the most consequential war of our lifetimes. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional  inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine. And the whole world is watching what we will do about it. 

The coming times may require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we are born into; we do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Take perspective. Play thisAnother version. More? Some people on the eastern front April 9th helping to hold onto an open society, a shrinking thing in the world. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they are doing it for us too. They are correct. The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. It's likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. (More.)

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through  to the extent they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine tend traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. The status of women is fast advancing, especially since February 2022 (pre-war article). And a reported 57,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, flooding traditionally male bastions, including as combat officers, artillery gunners, tankers, and snipers. (Intimidating video: "As the Witch has Said".)
  
Ukraine's LGBT military unicorn emblem
Ukraine's LGBT military unicorn.
The thorns and barbed wire
represent old restrictions
now being cut away. 
 
Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, with official approval, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay." A report on Ukraine's current LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutions. AnotherAnotherAnother. War changes things.

And in December 2022, Russia made it a crime not just to speak for LGBT recognition, but to speak for "non-traditional sexual relations." Until last year Russia had a polyamory education and awareness movement.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our continued material aid for however long as it takes to win. Speak up for it.

A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."


Ukrainian women soldiers in dense undergrowth
Women fighters in a trench in the Donetsk region

PPS:  US authoritarians (such as Sen. Ted Cruz) are saying that allowing women in front-line roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Ukraine puts that shit to bed. Do you have a relative who talks like that? Send them this video link to Vidma, who commands a mortar platoon, recounting one of their battles in Bakhmut – the Verdun of this war.

_________________________

 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE

_________________________


Labels: , , , , , , , , ,