Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



November 24, 2024

How ENM and poly values "counter authoritarianism and improve collective well-being." Yearnings grow for non-nuclear chosen family, poly or not. And more.


● Relevant to the present moment: 5 Ways Non-Monogamous Values Counter Authoritarianism and Inspire Collective Well-Being. It's by relationship coach Aria Diana on her Navigating Non-Monogamy substack (Nov. 12).

She's talking especially about family- and community-style polyamory — the kind where the people in a polycule are all there for each other, regardless of its sub-configuration of sex and romance. Platonic friends might be part of the family too.


How non-monogamy’s principles of collaboration and mutual care challenge hierarchical power structures.

Aria Diana

My heart feels heavy right now.... The recent U.S. presidential election underscores that, as a society, we are far from okay. We’re witnessing the damaging effects of a deeply embedded supremacy mindset that teaches domination as the norm, prioritizing control and power over collective well-being. In these times, envisioning an alternative path (and then building it, together) feels more crucial than ever.

An increasingly authoritarian America stands to learn profoundly from the transformative values of non-monogamy, compersion, and abundant love. The work we’re doing to unlearn toxic monogamy and cultivate healthier, more expansive relationship ecosystems transcends the personal—it’s a direct challenge to the hierarchical, scarcity-driven systems embedded in our culture.

Non-monogamy teaches us flexibility, empathy, and a commitment to relational abundance and collective care, values that stand in stark opposition to the harmful frameworks that dominate mainstream society. Embracing these principles of ... shared well-being confronts the corrosive narrative of rugged individualism and resource hoarding....

...Non-monogamous values challenge these norms by fostering interconnectedness, openness, and a reimagined sense of community. ...We create networks of love and support that honor autonomy and nurture a more embodied sense of security, dignity, and belonging... opposing the scarcity-driven, hierarchical frameworks where billionaires hoard wealth while [many or most] struggle to survive.
















...Here are five powerful ways non-monogamous values counter authoritarianism and inspire collective well-being:

Letting Go of Ownership: Non-monogamy disrupts the notion of ownership within relationships, encouraging appreciation, gratitude and respect.... Extending this principle beyond relationships, we can challenge harmful attachments to ownership over land, resources, and people. Let us shift from a mindset rooted in control and divisive “us versus them” thinking to one grounded in respect for autonomy, dismantling the forces of exploitation... that fuel a culture of extraction and inequality.

Reconceptualizing Security and Power: In American culture, security is often equated with dominance, surveillance, violence, mandates, power struggles, and resource hoarding. Non-monogamous relationships, by contrast, demonstrate that security is built on trust, care, mutually created agreements, openness and vulnerability. When we project control onto others, we may actually undermine the... safety we hope to create....

Promoting Abundance Thinking: Compersion and non-monogamy show us that love and connection are limitless, contrasting the scarcity mindset often reinforced by the isolated nuclear family model. ... Rather than viewing resources as finite and hoarding them, we can embrace collective stewardship....

Embracing Compersion Over Competition: ...A society that celebrates others’ successes without competition and rivalry fosters empathy and interconnectedness. ...

Cultivating Emotional Intelligence and Non-Violent Communication: Non-monogamy requires deep self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and the ability to have respectful, open dialogue to find mutually acceptable solutions that can work for many people with different needs. ...

Despite what’s happening on the national level, let’s continue to work together with our neighbors, polycules and wider local relational ecosystems to create regenerative communities rooted in collective support, abundance — and the understanding that when we care for one another, everyone can truly flourish....

Graphic of 9 people with backs turned, holding hands and walking down a flowery trail


















●  On that same theme of community, a writer in USA Today observes,


USA Today

By David Oliver (Nov. 15)

Family is everything for Chaneé Jackson Kendall. But her family doesn't look like what society has told us it should. That's because she's Black and polyamorous; the influencer space and mass media might make you think most polyamorous people – like families – look the same. White.

..."We've been polyamorous for a while," says Ebony Hagans, a polyamory expert and creator of the @marjanilane Instagram account. "It's not something that we just started doing two days ago." They saw a "huge gap of education between the Black community and just a general nonmonogamous community." [Here she is talking about "mistakes I've made as a polyamorous person":]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Ebony Hagans (@marjanilaEbony Hagans, @marjaniKendall adds: "My family consists of four adults who are raising a child together," she says, "and we have decided that we are going to do life together, irrespective of the many ways that our romantic and sexual relationships … have changed and fluctuated throughout the past nine-plus years since our child was born." Plus, their support system consists all four of their respective biological families, not to mention their chosen"There's not a whole lot of conversation about how queer BIPOC polyamory communities are actually pretty big," says Flo Oliveira, another educator. ... "The cultural context of African-American families has always been communal," Kendall says.


Some argue "as polyamory gains interest and becomes more accessible, Black, queer femme and nonbinary individuals should be centered," says a recent research paper by polyamorous psychologist Manijeh Badiee and personal coach Evita Sawyers; "they are enhancing polyamory discourse by discussing marginalization beyond queerness and providing strategies for survival and resistance." ...

"I personally do not date white folks in the polyamory community, because my experience has not been too great," Oliveira says. "There's definitely an aspect of being fetishized that is really wild to me."

Sawyers adds: "We tend to think of racism as looking a particular way, but fetishization is a form of racism. And so I may not experience going to a polyamorous event and someone calling me something (derogatory) or saying some kind of microaggression, although that has occurred, but what I will experience is people fetishizing me."

Of course, not everyone has negative experiences. "In general... in the poly community that I've been part of in whichever city, I've definitely seen most of the white people have been really understanding, and they they want to learn," adds Abhijith Asok, who is polyamorous. "They really want to learn more. So they do ask questions and those things like that. But at the end of the day, the job of teaching them also falls on you." ...

If you have another polyamory story you'd like to share, email doliver@usatoday.com.



●  Widening the theme: Good Housekeeping magazine, an American family tradition for 139 years, presents Non-Nuclear Families — Out of Necessity — Are Sought After, and on the Rise (Sept. 1). Quoting at length:


What if we organized our “village” in a different way?

Getty images

By Rachael Rifkin

When you picture a “typical” American family, it might look something like this: two parents, their 2.5 kids and a house in a neighborhood that does not include their extended family or friends. ... But this is only a recent idea of how our lives should be structured. The self-reliant nuclear family has never been a sustainable model, and has historically not worked for certain groups, like BIPOC, low-income, queer found family and polyamorous folks. ...

Amidst changes in the economy, urbanization, immigration, caregiving burnout, rising loneliness and marriage and reproduction rates, there’s been a shift away from the self-reliant nuclear family as the center for family life. ... Instead, people are returning to the idea of having a strong support network and living with or near the people we’re closest with, just like we did for most of humanity. In fact, it’s become such a ubiquitous desire that if you’re having a conversation with someone of millennial age or younger, it’s only a matter of time before they wistfully bring up their dream of getting a plot of land with their friends and living in a more communal way.

“We create memes and jokes about it, but why don't we actually do it?” asks [the noted polyfamily blogger, coach and influencer] Jessica Daylover, a digital media producer, entertainer, and mom of two, one of whom has high medical, emotional and social needs. “Because it takes a lot of time and money to buy land and build a big house or several houses, so it's probably not going to happen for 99.99% of people who want to do it. But something that would change my life immensely is living with or at least sharing resources with just one other family — just one. It's like a micro version of the bigger dream.”

Phil Levin knows exactly how difficult it is to create an intentional community from scratch with friends. He helped found the co-owned Oakland community Radish, which has six buildings and 10 units, and is home to 19 adults and five babies. ...

“The core impulse behind communal living is wanting a happier, healthier, more social life with more support,” said Levin. “People often find life overwhelming when they don’t have enough support, particularly when they’re taking care of kids or parents, or need their own extra help.”

Daylover couldn’t find [such a community], so she’s currently in the process of making an app through crowdfunding. Nuclear Fusion will match people looking to support each other’s caregiving needs (childcare, senior care, errand running, house and pet sitting, companionship, etc.) as well as teach the skills needed to build and maintain a village [not to mention a poly home], like how to communicate, advocate for your needs, and navigate decision making and conflict.

The app will function similar to a dating app, with the security and background checks of nanny-finding platforms like SitterCity and Care.com. ...

Phil recently started the social real estate platform LiveNearFriends, which helps people find homes that are within a short walk of friends and family. ...

Rhaina Cohen, a producer and editor for the NPR podcast Embedded, discussed the importance of having a variety of different close relationships in her book, The Other Significant Others: Reimagining Life with Friendship at the Center. ...

“We're taught that a romantic relationship is only successful if it functions as a one-stop-shop — where we can meet our needs for a confidant, co-parent, roommate, best friend and more,” she adds. “If a couple feels overwhelmed by all the responsibilities that fall to them, they may fault their relationship or themselves as individuals, rather than realize that we need larger support networks. One person is not enough to share all of life's burdens and joys.”

We weren’t always so focused on individual family units.

The benefits of having a village cannot be overstated. Studies have shown that healthy people who are more socially connected live longer, and that communities who engage in social connection regularly enjoy better health outcomes than communities who don’t. And according to the Harvard Happiness study, your relationships predict your happiness and healthiness later in life. It makes sense — villages are about taking care of each other and making sure everyone gets what they need.

Historically, having a village is also how we survived. “Anthropologists believe that for 95% of human history, we evolved within an egalitarian social structure. This shaped us to thrive on close social bonds, mutual support and shared responsibilities. We are hardwired to seek connection, collaboration, and fairness,” wrote Andie... who has a degree in anthropology and goes by Ancestral Habits on Instagram, in a May 20, 2024 post, citing evidence in How We Got Stuck: The Origins of Hierarchy and Inequality and Civilized to Death: The Price of Progress. ...

---------------------------------

...Sam and Ben are polyamorous and in a triad with Allie Long (they all date each other, and are open to dating others as well), who moved in with them in June 2023. All three co-parent together. “After my divorce, I was coming to terms with the fact that I might not have kids,” Allie says. “It all took shape at once. Sam's parents have been incredibly welcoming and wonderful.”

Allie is a musician, as are Sam’s parents. Before Allie moved in, Sam’s parents had gotten out of the habit of playing music. Now all three play their instruments after dinner, which is something Sam’s parents used to do when Sam was growing up. “It means a lot to them to have so much music back in the house,” Sam says.

Sam’s parents also appreciate knowing that there are three adults living at the house. “Both Allie and Ben work remotely, so there's almost always at least one of us there during the day. I think that’s really comforting to them,” Sam says. “And with so many adults there, Ben and I have more time for ourselves and our hobbies, so we can feel like more than just parents.”

Ember Cooley lives with a platonic partner who is aromantic, which means having little to no romantic attraction to others, and they often open their home to their village of loved ones.

They once lived with a roommate who has a young daughter. “When this child lived with us, caring for her became a community effort, involving people dear to us, including my partner's father, who we rent from and lives upstairs, and some neighbors,” Ember says. “Eventually, they found good housing far away, so we text and video call her daughter regularly, and have her stay with us on school breaks.”

They consider each of their loved ones irreplaceable. “Each deserves regular conversation about our needs and expectations, even if we have never been romantic or sexual. I value all the types of love I'm lucky enough to receive, equally,” Ember says.

Families have to be intentional about their organization.

Though the American family has changed, tax breaks, healthcare, citizenship and protection against discrimination still mainly applies to the nuclear family. 

Lawyer Diana Adams thinks that U.S. laws need to expand to include protections for a diversity of families, and has helped spearhead efforts to do so in a variety of states. Most recently, they were part of the coalition that drafted and passed bills in Oakland and Berkeley to extend non-discrimination laws to cover individuals with diverse family and intimate relationship structures, including multi-partner/multi-parent families and relationships, step-families, multi-generational households, non-nuclear family structures, consensually nonmonogamous relationships and platonic partnerships, including asexual and aromantic relationships. “It benefits all of us to allow for the kinds of families that exist and give them the support they need to be stable,” Adams says. ...

No matter what kind of family or village you have or want to have, setting up agreements and really getting to know each other ahead of time is important. In particular, Adams encourages people and potential communities to make co-living agreements and parenting agreements, which are out-of-court agreements that you can make through contract law.

“What's important is that people make really clear what their expectations are,” they add. “If you don't make a plan for how you communicate with each other, the loudest person is always going to be the default leader. It’s important that we be mindful about the power dynamics of gender, race, and class too, and think about what our decision making process is going to be and what our shared values are.”

Another thing to keep in mind: Before you make agreements and get started, you go slow. “Make sure that you've had your first fights and worked on a major project together that's going to be stressful and intense to see and develop that level of trust first,” Adams says. ...




●  Meanwhile, Throuples becoming more prevalent as family law plays catch-up (Toronto Sun, Nov. 17). Although the article is from Canada, this law firm's recommendations apply to U.S. polyfamilies too.

Even just writing down your group's agreements without a lawyer (each person keeps a copy signed and dated by all) is much better than nothing. 


By Denette Wilford

“We know that there are more people choosing to live in polyamorous relationships,” said Alyssa Bach, an associate at Shulman & Partners. “What we are still understanding is how it may play out when these relationships end. It’s definitely not straightforward, and without some type of agreement it can be complex and confusing.

Getty
...“As family lawyers, we advise individuals, couples and families, including anyone living in a polyamorous arrangement, to have an agreement in place to reduce potential conflict in the event of a breakup,” Bach recommended.

She added people can change the description of the relationship after they walk away, creating possible  “complexities in the event of a breakup and request for support.”

However, to help navigate these, for the most part, unchartered waters, Shulman & Partners suggests those in polyamorous relationships should be proactive with discussions and have an agreement in place detailing daily living and the rights and obligations of all involved.

They also point out that the possibilities of a separation should be considered, so each individual involved should factor in support payments, how property is handled and whether contact with non-biological children will continue. ...


The lawyer is interviewed intelligently on AM talk radio (it's Canada), in one of her many media appearances.


●  Here's more about the attraction people may feel to a couple's or polycule's relationship — not just to one or more of its members: What to Know About Symbiosexuality, by Zachary Zane (Men's Health, Nov. 11).

It's especially worth a read by poly dogmatists who say this isn't real.

As for implementing it wisely... that's a different question.


It's not an attraction to an individual or even to a couple, but to a couple's dynamic.

Getty
“Symbiosexual is a term to describe an individual who is attracted to the energy, dynamic, or connectedness between people in an existing relationship,” explains queer sex educator Gabrielle Kassel. Most commonly, the term refers to a single (or non-partnered) person interested in or turned on by the idea of joining a pre-existing couple. “However, this term could also refer to someone enchanted by the dynamics of a pre-existing polycule or throuple.” ...




●  Book news: So it's no surprise that Laura Boyle's Monogamy? In this Economy? Finances, Childrearing, and Other Practical Concerns of Polyamory is turning into a thing. It came out in August and, Boyle tells us, in September the publisher said sales had passed 2,500, beating expectations. The number surely grew more after the New York Times plugged the book in its article 6 Books About Nonmonogamy, Recommended by Therapists (Oct. 16). That attention "created a big bump," Boyle says, "just based on the Amazon rank jumping and staying high for a couple weeks."

She has been doing bookstore talks, podcast appearances, and social media. She writes,


The book tour has been wonderful, with engaged and engaging crowds all over the US and on my recent trip to London, where Ro Moed and I did an event. I’ve been absolutely humbled by the messages I’ve received from folks who have found the book helpful in planning moves in with their partners, or in finding new angles to consider problems of long standing in their households based on the ways people I spoke to in my survey had handled them. Seeing that [recommendation in] the New York Times among a number of books I admire a lot, after I took a moment to remember to breathe, is also great. I hope a lot of people find the examples and information in the book useful, for themselves and for clients if they’re in helping professions.

I’ve got interviews with a few magazines and papers in the wind 🤷‍♀️.  I also recorded an interview for a segment of an NPR Planet Money podcast but they haven’t confirmed if they’ll use it. 


Her interview on the Evolving Love podcast (Nov. 9) gives an idea of the serious but playful brains here. Polycule Practicalities with Laura Boyle:
 


For the book, Boyle collected surveys from 468 polyfolks who were or had been living in households of three or more adults. She then did deeper-dive interviews with 128 of them. The book is packed with frank, often unexpected realities of polygroup living and the inventive solutions that her interviewees have come up with.

Much in the book will be useful to platonic group households too.  

-------------------------------------------------------


And as more realize what's at stake . . .







    
I've put this Ukraine piece here since March 2022 in one form or another. At first some readers complained it was off topic and didn't see the tie-in. Now more get it.

Especially with last week's appointment picks announced in Washington, which resemble nothing sp much as a decapitation strike.

The fact is, I've seen too many progressive movements die out, or get wiped out, because they failed to scan the wider world accurately and understand their position in it strategically. So:

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society, religion, and nation. Because by living successfully outside their worldview, we expose its incompleteness.

Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Such a society is possible only where people have reasonably okay power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States. Now linking up with direct mutual support that is increasingly stated out loud.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, stacking agencies and courts, and sometimes, eventually, artillery.

Vote for Ukraine Aid protest signs outside the US Capitol
For what it's worth, Polyamory in the News received more pagereads from pre-invasion Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For those of us born since World War II, this is the most consequential war of our lifetime. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, linking up at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional — inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine. The whole world is watching what we will do about it. And now, about ourselves.


The coming times may require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we are born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. 

Need a little help bucking up? Play this. Another version. More? Some people on the Western world's eastern front trying to hold onto an open society. (TW: war is awful.) Maybe your own granddad did this from a trench facing Hitler's tanks — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 20th century.

But the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years then, either. Popular history remembers the 1945 victory over the Nazis and the joyous homecoming. Less remembered are the defeats and grim prospects from 1941 through early 1943.

Remember, these people say they are doing it for us too. They are correct. The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, ‘A Big Step Back’: In Ukraine, Concerns Mount Over Narrowing Press Freedoms (New York Times, June 18, 2024). And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. And they're stamping hard on the old culture of everyday, petty corruption.  More on that.  More; "Ukraine shows that real development happens when people believe they have an ownership stake in their own societies."

Wrote US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic early in the war, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trust: hromada. It's what's been keeping them going to the extent they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

----------------------------------

Social attitudes in Ukraine are mostly traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church. But in the last generation the ideal of modern European civil society has become widely treasured. The status of women has fast advanced, especially post-invasion. More than 43,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, flooding traditionally male bastions — including as combat officers, artillery gunners, tankers, battlefield medics, snipers, and infantry. Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, with official approval, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay." A report on Ukraine's LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutions. Another. Another. Another. War changes things.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our full material backing for as long as it takes them to win their security, freedom, and future. Continue to speak up for it. Like, right now.
                                     
A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."


Ukrainian women soldiers in dense undergrowth
Women defenders on our world's eastern front

PPS:  U.S. authori-tarians, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, say that allowing women in front-line roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Ukraine puts that shit to bed. Do you have a relative who talks like that? Send them this video link to Vidma, who commands a mortar platoon, recounting the story of one of their battles near Bakhmut. Or the other video link above.

Update Nov. 1, 2024: Two years later Vidma is still alive, still with her mortar unit, still at the front, and posting TikToks.  A young girl who looks high-school age showed up to join them. Another vid with her. Their lives, and their promising society, depend on us. 

And maybe our own? Says Maine's independent Senator Angus King,


Whenever people write to my office [asking why we are supporting Ukraine,] I answer, 'Google Sudetenland, 1938.' We could have stopped a murderous dictator who was bent on geographic expansion…at a relatively low cost. The result of not doing so was 55 million deaths.


Labels: , , , , ,



April 9, 2023

"Seeking Brother Husband" on TLC. More from Somerville. "Is monogamy so out it's kinky?" New books. And more polyamory in the news.




















●  TLC's long-brewing polyandry series Seeking Brother Husband is finally airing. It features four woman-centered polyamorous relationships, including longtime poly/ENM advocates Kenya and Carl Stevens and their partner Tiger, pictured above. The tag line: "Polyandrous families decide to bring new brother husbands into their lives."

Six weekly episodes are scheduled for Sunday nights at 10 Eastern, 9 Central, with many re-airings afterward and streaming available. Coming up tonight (Sunday April 9) is Episode 3, "Two Men and a Baby".  

The season trailer, with both laughter and tears:


Notice that the trailer crudely defines polyandry as what we would call a "one vagina policy" (two or more men but only one woman allowed) — the flip side of the infamous OPP. But in fact the people on the show contradict this definition.
 


TLC’s Seeking Brother Husband follows women looking for additional male partners. Its star, Kenya Stevens, and experts discuss the phenomenon

By Meagan Jordan

...“Women are not similar to men who set up poly lifestyles,” Kenya tells Rolling Stone. “We have our own way of doing it and it’s freedom-based and equitable.”

...While the network has offered a platform where polyamory can be seen... it’s hard not to notice the ways in which the show feels limiting. Granted, limiting things to only six 45-minute episodes that showcase four relationships makes showing the full scope of women-led polyamory hard, but with polyamory already being a misunderstood relationship practice at the national level, the first episode, whether intentional or not, makes it easy for American viewers to assume the stereotypical misconceptions. 

“The executives at TLC seemed to have a hard time understanding that women don’t set up our poly relationships like sister wives, where our partners cannot have other partners,” says Kenya. “They were constantly asking me to explain, ‘What is polyandry?’’ ‘What is polyamory?’”

When the pilot opens, Kenya’s voice welcomes the audience with a clear-cut description of  polyandry being “the practice of one woman having multiple husbands.” It then cuts to her and her husbands wearing all-white with her declaring, “I have two husbands who love me!” And while the latter is true, what isn’t mentioned is that Carl is also married to someone else, and her second husband Tiger has other partnerships outside of their union. 

“I thought it was misleading. None of the women on the show are polyandrous. All of us are polyamorous. We are open to our partners having other partners,” she explains. “Even to the end of the show, they didn’t allow us to have our husband’s other partners on the show. It was us with our husbands, the primary partners, and all of our male partners.” 

...“It’s hard to say whether the representation has gotten better because the concept of polyamory is very new to most people,” says Willie Burnley Jr., city councilor of Somerville, Massachusetts, and a polyamory advocate. “More people are familiar with swinging and polygamy, so the media portrayals often revert back to those understandings, and I think that is where [television] titles like Sister Wives and Brother Husband are rooted in ideas of the patriarchal portrayal of multiple relationships. In reality, most of the polyamorous community is focused on having egalitarian relationships.” 

Even the terminology of non-monogamy and polyamory can be specific and nuanced. ... “I think media portrayals are becoming more informed and we are seeing an increasing number of media outlets that are covering it in a neutral to positive way,” says Heath Schechinger,  co-founder of the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. “This is part of a broader movement that is focusing on families and relationships that fall outside of the traditional nuclear norm. Our laws and cultural norms were established to support a nuclear family structure that does not reflect the needs of our families today.” 

---------------------------------

...Truth be told, it is refreshing to see and learn of the Black people on the show, such as the Stevens’ and their partner(s) — who Kenya says have no current interest in legal marriage and are spiritually married — navigating polyamory, which has been wrongfully branded “white people shit” on social media due to a lack of representation in polyamorous spaces and media over the years. 

“As humans we are free, we should be free. I’m free to choose my life path, choose my own objectives,” says Kenya. “I can create my own life.”

A Facebook commenter confirms,


My aunt is on this show. I can definitely tell you the network creates the narrative and creates the stories they want to first hand, but I know these people in real life and these relationships have completely different Dynamics and so much more depth than what is displayed on the show.

Amazing people in real life. I'm just glad that the tribe mentality is becoming more mainstream and we're going back to the original way of our people.



● Somerville summaries look ahead. On March 23rd the Somerville, Mass., City Council voted unanimously to make Somerville the first city in the US to protect polyamorists and other non-standard family groupings from discrimination in employment and policing (a housing non-discrimination ordinance is coming soon). The heavy initial coverage of the vote has died down, but JDSupra Legal News offers this report on what actually happened and strategy for the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition moving ahead: A New Protected Category: Somerville, MA Passes Polyamory Antidiscrimination Ordinance (March 28)


...The Somerville legislation... is drafted quite simply.  First, the City Council added the following two definitions to its Code of Ordinances: 

Relationship status. The words “[family or] relationship status” mean the actual or perceived involvement or noninvolvement of an individual in an intimate personal relationship or relationships. It includes an individual’s actual or perceived affinity, or lack thereof, for any given type of intimate personal relationship, regardless of whether the individual is currently in any intimate personal relationship(s). 

Intimate personal relationship. The words “intimate personal relationship” shall include any interpersonal relationship between two or more adult individuals that involves romantic, physical, or emotional intimacy. This includes multi-partner/multi-parent families and relationships, step families, multi-generational households, and consensual sexual relationships, including relationships involving consensual non-monogamy. 

Once those definitions were in place, the Council simply added “[family or] relationship status” to the section of its Ordinance mandating non-discriminatory treatment for city employees and job applicants. ... 

The simplicity of the Somerville ordinance makes it ripe for imitation. ... 


And from PLAC and OPEN member Heath Schechinger, A Historic Step Forward for Polyamorous and Non-normative Families: The Impact of Somerville’s Non-Discrimination Ordinance (linked from OPEN's website, April 5).


●  Another Somerville coda. Boston Globe columnist Kevin Cullen, legendary organized-crime reporter, pokes fun at Globe readers and commenters who were aghast at the Somerville vote. He calls us polyfolks all kinds of wonderful — particularly compared to certain other Somervillians in the neighborhood of City Hall who he's previously covered: Somerville’s current polyamorous people are much, much nicer than the Winter Hill Gang (March 28). It's thoroughly tongue in cheek.


After my colleague Meredith Goldstein wrote a story last week about the City Council in Somerville approving an ordinance to protect people in polyamorous relationships from discrimination, you could hear heads explode all over the place.

Some comments on the story are over the top, with many suggesting that Western civilization as we know it is about to collapse because this ordinance recognizes nontraditional relationships.

What’s with the prudish pearl clutching? Who is this hurting?

The people who pushed for this ordinance, and the people it protects, are decent, intelligent, tolerant, and engaged citizens, committed to equality, the sort of people who are a credit to their community; they are strong on committed relationships — plural — and the importance of consent.

In short, they are the opposite of the original boosters of nonmonogamy in Somerville, the Winter Hill Gang, a bunch of mobsters whose headquarters in the 1970s was a garage on Marshall Street [a short stroll from City Hall –Ed.].

The Winter Hill guys had wives, girlfriends, common-law wives, teenage girlfriends, and more girlfriends. Those relationships were a one-way street. The men exploited the women in their lives. They were not relationships founded on equality or respect.

The problem wasn’t that Winter Hill guys were polyamorous. It’s that they were polymurderous. Not to mention misogynistic.

The garage was a social club. Gangsters’ wives and girlfriends regularly dropped by, bringing food for the boys. After one of them dropped off some spaghetti and meatballs, Whitey Bulger, a Winter Hill guy from South Boston, tied her to a chair and repeatedly threw a knife into the cheesy wood paneling behind her.

...At Bulger’s federal racketeering trial in 2013, when he was convicted of 11 murders, including a woman sexually involved with one of the Winter Hill guys, Winter Hill-style nonmonogamy was revealed in great detail. ... [Read the original at your own risk.]

...For all those up in arms over Somerville’s new ordinance protecting polyamorous people from discrimination, rest assured that those who need that protection are good people who want to contribute to their community and treat their partners with respect. That’s more than the gangsters of Winter Hill ever did.    



●  In my last post I dissed Glam, a product-laden women's online magazine than claims a million monthly visitors, for the superficiality of its spate of Poly 101 articles. But they've been getting better as the magazine continues to crank them out (did someone there see my criticism?). The latest as of this writing is Vees, Triads, Quads: The Different Types Of Polyamorous Relationship Structures, Explained (April 7). It doesn't get everything just right, but for its newbie audience it's a useful taxonomy of the many species and subspecies of our relationships (and their terminology) that new folks are going to encounter. 


●  Elsewhere: Is "toxic positivity" hurting the poly movement? Shouldn't we have outgrown the need to overspin the happy-happy? This important article appeared in Vice's iD Magazine: Polyamory has a toxic positivity problem. (March 23)


Being poly is no more or less valid than any other relationship dynamic; why do people both on and offline see it as a 'more evolved' way of being?

By Abby Moss

Suddenly, everywhere you look, it’s polyamory. Or at least it’s abstract ideas of polyamory. Not quite mainstream yet, polyamory is certainly enjoying a broadening spotlight, whether that’s in the appearance of a throuple in Gucci’s recent campaign with Elliot Page or more nuanced explorations of poly dynamics in TV shows like Trigonometry. ... On TikTok, #polyamory has over three billion views.

The Dreamers
But not all representations of polyamory online are sitting well. And it’s not necessarily the negative representations, the unkind or ridiculous criticisms (such as the eye-roll-inducing claims that poly people are all ugly, or that polyamory harms women), that are rubbing poly folks up the wrong way. Counter-intuitively, it’s excessively positive representations of polyamory that are now being called out too.

Polyamorous throuples, polycules (a connected network of people in non-monogamous relationships) and families are taking to Instagram and TikTok to show the world how great their relationships are, in accounts that look queasily similar to the kind of toxically positive parenting accounts that have already been broadly challenged. ...

In one Instagram account with over 127k followers, long-term couple Dana and Daniel share reels and TikToks of their experiences dating polyamorously. They have been criticised, though, for showing an unrealistic representation that borders on sexist. “As the male of a poly relationship, I’d love to see some Daniel struggles. I find it’s often more difficult for a man to get dates,” said one comment, referencing the classic assumption that polyamory is more fun (and easier) for men.... On other accounts, polyamorous families showcase the sunny side of their relationship and rarely talk about struggles at all. It’s all smiley shots of date nights and family outings.

“I’m just gonna say it — the culture of toxic positivity within the polyamorous community isolates actual polyamorous people who are struggling and does more harm than good,” wrote Leanne Yau, founder of polyamory education platform Polyphilia Blog, in a series of Instagram posts that received hundreds of comments. “It sets unrealistic expectations of what polyamorous living is like, and leaves newbies woefully unprepared.” ...

...Educators like Leanne have started to challenge the idea that a person should do all their learning (and unlearning) about monogamy and polyamory in theory before diving into relationships. Although it’s important to educate yourself about polyamory to some degree, and to think carefully about your own desires and boundaries, expecting people to be perfect in polyamorous dynamics from day one just isn’t realistic. ...

...“I’ve started being more straight with my friends about what I’m going through,” says Georgia. “I think it’s important, for polyamory to be taken seriously, that we talk about it for all that it is -- the good stuff, but also the confusing and messy parts too.”



(To me, the cover says kitchen table poly
the morning after.) 
●  New Book:  Why It's OK To Not Be Monogamous by Justin Clardy, a Black assistant professor of philosophy at Santa Clara University (Routledge and Taylor & Francis, 182 pages, March 2023). The press release from the publisher: Polyamorous relationships can have as many benefits as monogamous ones, shows research (April 3)


Polyamorists face stigma and discrimination in their day-to-day lives, yet research shows that having a romantic relationship with more than one person at a time may offer emotional and physical benefits to all parties.

Monogamy is frequently portrayed as the ideal form of romantic love in many modern societies. ... States and governments offer financial, legal, and social incentives to married couples. Meanwhile men and women who deviate from these monogamous norms are treated as pariahs and publicly shamed.


















Despite this, polyamorous relationships are on the rise. It is estimated that between 4–5% of the U.S. population is currently involved in consensually non-monogamous relationships. ...

Increasing numbers of legal and political scholars are arguing for reforms to current family laws so that they recognise the wide variety of intimate personal relationships in which humans can thrive.

“Polyamorists face the risk of being fired, denied housing or citizenship, or having their children taken away from them because of their polyamorous identities and lifestyles,” says Justin Clardy, a professor of philosophy at Santa Clara University.

“However, in many cases poly relationships are more durable than monogamous ones, because their flexibility allows them to meet shifting needs over time in a way that monogamous relationships don’t.”

Justin Clardy
Justin Clardy

Professor Clardy has dedicated his academic career to studying the ethicality of non-monogamous relationship styles and the unjust political consequences faced by non-monogamists.

In Why It’s OK To Not Be Monogamous, Clardy summarises the main arguments that are commonly put forward to support monogamy. He then debunks each one with thorough research. ...

One of the most common arguments against polyamory is that it incites painful feelings of jealousy, however monogamous couples experience this emotion too. In fact, Clardy argues that in many cases vulnerability, possessiveness, and a sense of entitlement to another person’s love are more at the heart of jealousy then we care to admit.

Clardy argues that polyamory, on the other hand, can benefit relationships by refocusing our attention on how one’s partner fares in their other intimate relationships.

“When governed by mutual consent and understanding, polyamorous relationships can allow people to share more fully in the happiness of others,” says Clardy.

“This can be achieved by confronting and managing one’s vulnerability, by softening our propensity to be jealous, and by learning to pay attention to the flourishing of others.”

------------------------------

Some of the harshest critics of polyamorists argue that non-monogamy is harmful to the family unit, leading to divorce and the breakdown of families. However according to Clardy, polyamorous families both exist and thrive, and such an arrangement can actually benefit children.

“It may not take an entire village to raise a child, but it stands to reason that all things being equal, having more than one ‘father’ or ‘mother’ as a caregiver may be even more conducive to meeting children’s needs, as children may be loved and nurtured in unconventional families,” says Clardy.

“Indeed, it may turn out that on average, the existence of more than two caregivers is the superior parenting arrangement.” ...

The book is getting press attention, for example Polyamory Is On The Rise And Society Should Be More Accommodating, Research Argues (IFLScience, April 3).


●  Speaking of new books, I've started reading Fifty Years of Polyamory in America by Glen W. Olson and Terry Lee Brussel-Rogers (Rowman & Littlefield, Nov. 2022). The book is mostly about the first third of those fifty years, in which the authors were often enmeshed: from the seminal Family Synergy group in which they lived in southern California, to the neo-pagan Church of All Worlds; Deborah Anapol and Intinet (before the internet); San Francisco's widely influential Kerista commune (creators of our words compersion and polyfidelity); the Live The Dream group; the late Helen and Stan Dale and their Human Awareness Institute, seed bed for many of the attitudes and ideals of today's polyamory movement; and other early visionaries. The book continues through the early 1990s and the founding and growth of Loving More magazine and its conferences, and the relationship radicals (for those times) that Loving More helped collect into a movement.

I'll have more to say about the book when I finish it.


●  Signs of the times now: Is Monogamy So Out It's Kinky? (Coveture, a women's fashion/ beauty/ shopping magazine, March 27)


While traditional monogamy may seem like a vestige of a bygone era, its place in the dating landscape has a unique flavor alongside the à la carte options of alternative relationship styles. ...



●  And from Vice, thoughtful advice of a sort that didn't used to be offered: How to Close Your Open Relationship (April 6)


Sometimes people change their minds about what they want from non-monogamy – and that's perfectly OK.

..."It's completely reasonable to decide that it's not the right path for you. Situations change, our needs shift, and we never know exactly how we'll feel about something new until we try it – so it's important not to feel guilty about changing your mind.”

..."Approach this conversation with a sense of partnership and a sense that you're in this to solve issues together.”

[Callisto] Adams suggests using a variation on this phrasing: "I'm sensing that you're enjoying the openness a lot more than I am, and I understand – enjoying the openness is one of the most obvious points to an open relationship. However, I value you and your presence in my life, and I felt like sharing this concern with you, as this is something that's making me uncomfortable."

...Don’t chicken out of saying what you really want. “State clearly that you want to go back to a monogamous relationship, so there is no confusion.”...

...Your next step is to actively listen to your partner’s response and any questions they might have. ...

If being monogamous doesn’t have to last forever, then neither does being non-monogamous, but the transition between the two has to come with the age-old staple of a healthy relationship: honest communication.



●  A crossword clue in The New Yorker puzzle for March 27, difficult level: "Some polyamorous relationships".

The answer: "throuples".

In a year or two that'll be easy level.


UPCOMING POLYCONS: 
 
–  Southwest Love Fest, April 14–16, Tucson, AZ
–  The ever poly-friendly New Culture Spring Camp, May 5–10, Abrams Creek Retreat Center, Mt. Storm, WV.

Summer brings more. See Alan's List of Polyamory Events for all such gatherings for the next 12 months. All that I know about, anyway! Tell me about any I'm missing: alan7388 (at) gmail.com .

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meanwhile...

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many progressive movements die out because they failed to scan the wider world correctly and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside of their worldview, we expose its incompleteness.

Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Russian cartoon character Masyanya proudly holding a Ukraine flag
When the war started the Russian family-cartoon series
Masyanya turned dissident. Watch. The cartoonist got
 out. Update: a sequel of turnabout, with a coda
of empathy in wartime. 
 
Such a society is possible only where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States — now with direct mutual support.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, abuse of police powers, or eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, this site received more pagereads from pre-war Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For now, you can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of vetted organizations or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, a project of an old friend of my wife (story).

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, we are witnessing the most consequential war of our lifetimes. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional — inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine.

The coming times are going to require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we are born into; we do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Play this. Another version, on the streets of Kherson the night after its liberation. More? Just some guys in Kharkiv (our Pizza for Ukraine town) helping to hold onto a free and open society, a shrinking thing in the world. The tossed grenade seems to have saved them. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they are doing it for us too. They are correct.  The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. It's likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. (More.)

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trust: hromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through as well as they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that  community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine tend traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. The status of women is fast advancing, especially since the start of the war (pre-war article). A reported 57,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, flooding traditionally male bastions, including as combat officers, platoon leaders, artillery gunners, tankers, and snipers. (Intimidating video: "So The Witch Has Said".) Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay."  Article on Ukraine's current LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutions. Another. Another. War changes things.

And in November 2022, Russia made it a crime not just to speak for LGBT recognition, but to speak for "non-traditional sexual relations." Until last year Russia had a polyamory education and awareness movement.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our continued material support for as long as it takes to win. Speak up for it.

A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."

"Defenders of Bakhmut": painting of a woman soldier under fire in a trench holding up a Ukraine flag
"Defenders of Bakhmut," by Natasha Le from Mikolaiv. She reinterprets traditional guardian angels as riot grrls for an upcoming generation.
--------------------

PS: A real-life version of that icon in Bakhmut; the artwork is not fantasy. "Vidma" commands a mortar platoon there. After she and her unit were rotated out she posted this (Feb. 26): 


She, and thousands like her, put to bed the lie spread by US authoritarians (such as Sen. Ted Cruz) that allowing women in combat roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Do you have a relative who says that kind of shit? Send them the video link.
                           
_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE 

_________________________

[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,