Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



May 31, 2025

Many upcoming polyamory events. Poly legal rights advance. Multi-love in cartoons and movie rescriptings. And, No Kings Day is June 14

___________________________

First: Here all the regional poly community events coming up in the next five months (that I know about). Conferences! Campouts! Retreats!

June 6  8, Washington, DC

June 6  9, Galliners, Catalonia, Spain

June 26 – 30Breckenridge, CO

  Poly Big Fun

July 3  6, Bastrop State Park near Austin, TX


July 4  6, Alborache, València, Spain

July 7 – 13, US and worldwide

July 12, Tukwila, WA (suburb of Seattle)


July 25  August 3, Abrams Creek Retreat Center, Mt. Storm, WV


  Polywood 2025
August 8  10, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

August 24 – September 1, Nevada desert

  Camp Menagerie (formerly PolyCamp Northeast)
Mid-late August (TBA), central New Hampshire 

  Camp Constellation (a spinoff from the above)
August 30  September 3, southern Maine

September 5  7, Ávila, Spain

  Polytopia
September 19  21, Portland, OR

October 16  20, Breckenridge, CO


November 7  9, Indianapolis, IN

More about all these events — and those for the next 12 months — is at Alan's List of Polyamory Events

Any missing? Write me at alan7388 (at) gmail.com

___________________________


And now to the news. It's not all grim.

  From Canada comes another big, if partial, legal win for polyfamily rights: ‘Multi-parent’ families, like throuples, to be granted legal rights in Quebec (CTV News, April 30) 


By Rachel Lau

A recent ruling in Quebec has granted multi-parental families in the province the same legal rights as any other unit.

Diva Plavalaguna/pexels.com













A Quebec Superior Court judge ruled on [April 25] that limiting the legal affiliation of children to one or two parents is unconstitutional.

Lawyer Marc-André Landry, who represented one of the families involved in the case, explains the ruling does not apply to step-parents or other “modern” families that are formed after a child is born. Rather, it applies to a situation where a family has multiple adults involved in a relationship before the child’s conception.

In other words, Landry notes, the “parental project” needs to be in place prior to the child’s creation.

“It’s not about step-parents or other potential realities, it’s really about three people sitting together and saying, ‘We should have a child together,’ ” he explains. “No one should be treated differently because of their family status.”

Three families were part of the case.

The first constitutes a “throuple,” three adults – a man and two women – in a relationship, with four children among them.

The second involves a lesbian couple and a male donor who wished to be part of the child’s life as a father figure.

The third includes a woman living with infertility who allowed her husband to have a child with a friend, who asked to remain on as a mother.

“Those families do exist, no matter what people may think,” said Landry, calling the move a “major” change in our collective legal comprehension. “You have kids whose affiliation, from a legal standpoint, does not match their reality.”

Landry equates Friday’s ruling to the changing views of same-sex families during the 1980s and 1990s.

“It’s the same thing here. The law needs to evolve to match the reality of all Canadian citizens, and those babies who have not chosen to be born in multi-parental families. They must have the same protection, same rights as any other babies under the law.”

The Quebec government now has 12 months to amend the Civil Code to match the ruling.


 – As reported in the Daily Mail: Court grants THROUPLES the same legal rights as two-parent families (May 1) 


...'In these times when the right to equality is savagely attacked, it feels good,' lawyer Marc-André Landry, who represented the plaintiffs, wrote after the ruling.

...'The families are overwhelmed with joy,' Landry told DailyMail.com. 'They are being recognized and treated equally which is important for them but also more important for their children. ...

 "Toronto 'polycule', married couple Zoe and Rowan Knox with their lovers
Dani and Dame who were not part of the lawsuit."






























–  Broader legal report: Quebec court recognises multi-parent families (International Comparative Legal Guide, May 1)


...Quebec now joins several Canadian provinces and territories that acknowledge multi-parent families. British Columbia allows up to three parents if there has been a written agreement prior to conception, while Ontario and Saskatchewan permit up to four parents regardless of conception methods. In Yukon, birth declarations can include "another parent" beyond the mother and father. 

However, the practice has yet to catch on in most other jurisdictions, with California and Maine being the only US states to allow three-parent birth certificates in some cases.

Elsewhere, both South Africa and Washington, DC, permit three parents to be named where the child has been born by surrogacy while, in New Zealand, the law allows for multiple individuals to have parental status under certain surrogacy arrangements, but currently, only two parents can be listed on New Zealand birth certificates.

No European country allows for more than two parents to be registered on a child’s birth records, although discussions are currently ongoing.

The judgment builds on the provisions of Quebec’s Bill 2, introduced in 2021 and enacted in June 2022, which introduced comprehensive reforms to the province's family law, particularly concerning filiation and civil status. 

...Traditional legal frameworks assume a two-parent model, but this no longer represents many lived realities, including families formed through surrogacy, same-sex parenting, step-parenting and polyamorous arrangements. In such families, multiple adults may share parental responsibilities and form emotional bonds with the child from birth. Denying legal recognition to all parental figures not only creates legal uncertainty, especially in areas such as inheritance, medical consent and custody, it is also unnecessarily cruel.


Unlike in the US these days, where often "the cruelty is the point."


  And from New Zealand, Polyamorous throuple fight to keep their names on children’s birth certificates (New Zealand Herald, May 10)


...The Attorney-General’s crown counsel, Daniel Perkins, insisted the appeal wasn’t because of the family’s sexual orientation, but simply because it wasn’t possible to have more than two people listed in the system. ...



  From Scotland, Firefighters’ union branch seeks rights for polyamorous people (The Times, UK, April 4)


The LGBT+ group within the union submitted a motion for discussion at the Scottish Trades Union Congress LGBT+ Workers’ Conference next month calling for the “stigma around polyamory to be challenged”.

“There are no legal protections for polyamorous people in Scotland, they can be discriminated [against] at work and in wider society,” it read.



  The much-awaited Family and Relationship Structure Non-Discrimination Legislative Toolkit is new from the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, in the face of Trump and his federal goons plowing up Harvard. It's a guide for activists and lawyers who want to pass local non-discrimination ordinances such as pioneered by Somerville, Cambridge, Oakland, and Berkeley.


This Legislative Toolkit is designed to advance non-discrimination protections for diverse family and relationship structures. It serves as a resource to empower individuals and organizations who are passionate about creating more inclusive communities through local policy change.


Available in a PDF version and a mobile-friendly version, it's a 55-page slide deck that explains legislative processes, how to build your local support and get legislative sponsors, how to get your procedural ducks in a row (avoid newbie errors; involve the city or town government's legal office before it comes to a vote), and otherwise learn from proven routes to success.

The project was co-produced with four other organizations:





 25 Years of Polyamory in Cartoons comes from Genevieve (centered below) of the Chill Polyamory YouTube channel. It's the latest in her "non-monogamy in film & TV" category, rating "who's messy and who gets it right."


She did serious homework. She examines episodes from The Simpsons, Bojack Horseman, Bob's Burgers, Young Justice, Steven Universe, Big Mouth, She-Ra, Rick & Morty, Carol and the End of the World, and many more. She plots them on a two-axis grid: for treating poly as a joke vs. seriously, and stupidly vs. poly-savvy. The two axes turn out to be only weakly correlated. She's smart, quick, has professional chops as a TV and film producer, and promotes excellent ENM values. Running time 1 hour 10 minutes, fast-paced throughout.

She's also done 30 Years of Polyamory in Sitcoms (37 minutes).

Here's a heart-to-heart interview she had on Libby Sinback's "Making Polyamory Work": Community Care with Genevieve of Chill Polyamory (May 24, 2024). They go deep.


  And finally, humor in The New Yorker: Films That Have Been Rewritten Now That Everyone Is Talking About Polyamory (March 19). It's behind a paywall, but a ctrl-a,c flycast catches the fish. Excerpts:


By Janet Manley and Sara C. Hahn

“Anne of Green Gables” (1985)
...Anne embodies the best of chosen-family life and quickly becomes “bosom friends” with another puff-sleeve-coded girl, Diana. Anne and Diana each marry their high-school sweethearts and stay on the island but, after a cordial-wine incident.... 

“Clueless” (1995)
An aspiring matchmaker sets up two teachers at her Los Angeles high school and, when romance blossoms, decides to make it more interesting by adding a third. ... Cracks begin to show between Ms. Geist, Mr. Hall, and Coach Stoeger. An epic dodgeball battle ensues. ...

“Troy” (2004)
After Paris falls in love with Helen, the wife of King Menelaus of Sparta, things almost come to blows, but everyone’s able to negotiate and agree that Helen can spend Tuesdays with Paris, and be with Theseus, Peneleos, Achilles, Deiphobus, and King Menelaus on the other nights of the week, but have Sundays to herself. It’s actually pretty nice to have some time apart and not feel completely beholden to a bunch of emotionally volatile men of Sparta.

“Love Actually” (2003)
...Anyway, it’s Christmastime, and everyone’s feeling flirty. ... [Eventually the situation] complicates things immensely for the couple’s therapist, who now has to fit three people into the forty-five-minute slot for the same price....

“Legends of the Fall” (1994)
On an isolated ranch in Montana, during the Second World War, a striking woman with untamed hair is brought to the homestead by her husband, the youngest brother of three. ... [Eventually] everyone agrees it would be best if she were to split her time between the haystack back at the ranch and her senator’s-wife life in Helena. ...

“The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” (2003)
Four brave, herb-smoking hobbits go on an epic journey to throw an evil ring into a volcano. ... With the ring destroyed, and trauma sustained, the triumphant hobbit wakes in his bed. The dropouts join him, and his primary looks on with a loving gaze. They all move into the most incredible, antique-filled burrow ever to exist in the Shire. No judgy hobbit can say anything, because they did save Middle-earth. ...

“Cast Away” (2000)
After the FedEx executive Chuck Noland crashes in the Pacific Ocean and washes ashore on a deserted island, the solo, poly businessman is very open to connecting with others. ... [learning how to make] clear enough smoke signals to convey what you want.

“Point Break” (1991)
...Can’t men figure this stuff out themselves? ... Bodhi, who runs the surfing gang and the Ex-Presidents, does not fall in love quite so easily, but a three-person romance begins to take shape. A game of flirtatious shark-and-surfer ensues.... [Eventually] they all handcuff themselves to one another and ride that wave. ...



----------------------------------------------------


And a public service announcement:

Saturday June 14 is No Kings Day nationwide!

It's shaping up as our biggest stand to save democracy yet.

June 14 is Trump's birthday. For the occasion (barely disguised by Flag Day and the US Army's anniversary), Trump will march his long-sought giant military parade through streets of the capital the way they do in Russia, China, and North Korea.


Trump says the parade will “blow everything away,” including the World Cup and the Olympics. The vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff had this to say when Trump wanted the parade in his first term: “This is what dictators do.”


Dictators put on these displays not to impress foreign adversaries, who already know the military capabilities. The intended audience is the country's own subjects, who are supposed to be awed into quietude.

But in the US? At least 1,400 NO KINGS DAY rallies and events will also burst forth on June 14. Find yours here. Please show up for democracy's future.

Organizers ask: "Wave your flag like your life depended on it." Lots of American folx have more than one; there's still time to get your polyamory flag.

The centerpiece event of the day will be in Philadelphia, birthplace of American democracy. DC is deliberately being ignored.

[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,



June 17, 2022

OPEN, a new polyactivist group, launches with petition drive: "Tell Facebook to allow multiple relationship statuses"


 
For years, polyamory activists have pushed Facebook to let CNM folks specify their "relationship status" clearly, rather than having to pick just one of the several, mostly mono-normative choices that Facebook allows.

Now the new polyamory activist group OPEN, the Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy, has just launched an effort to get Facebook to allow polyfolks to specify themselves more correctly. It's running a petition drive, Remove Facebook's Limits on Love, addressed to Tom Alison, the Meta corporation's VP in charge of Facebook. Excerpts:


Human connection has long been at the center of Meta’s mission and values. ... Unfortunately, the design of the “relationship status” feature prevents many users from indicating the connections most important to them. By restricting users to one relationship status (and one tagged partner) on their Profile, non-monogamous individuals are arbitrarily prevented from expressing the full range of their connections on the Facebook App.

Ethical non-monogamy, also referred to as consensual non-monogamy, is a term encompassing a range of relationship practices involving multiple partners, with the full knowledge and consent of everyone involved. In the US, 4-5% of adults currently practice some form of ethical non-monogamy, with one in five adults entering into a consensually non-monogamous relationship at some point in their lives. ...

Given the growing prevalence of ethical non-monogamy, we believe that restricting users to listing only one relationship status on their Profile is arbitrary, exclusionary, and contrary to Meta’s core values. ...

Meta has long demonstrated a limited recognition of non-monogamous relationships through the inclusion of an “open relationship” option for the “relationship status” field. ... We are requesting that Meta take the next step in facilitating inclusive connection on the Facebook App by removing the limit of one “relationship status” on Profiles.


Nice and polite. Will they listen? Go sign. And,


Check out our promotional guide for graphics and captions to share this campaign with your community, or use the buttons below to share the petition directly:



Posting to Instagram stories?
            Please use the “LINK” tool to add a direct link from your story to the petition at tinyurl.com/facebooklimitslove 

Posting to your Instagram feed?
          Because Instagram does not support direct links in captions, consider adding a direct link to the petition to your IG profile or linktree.





The most interesting thing to me is who's behind this.

OPEN, the Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy, is a newly founded non-profit based in Sacramento and San Francisco with some serious talent and money behind it. They've chosen the perennial Facebook relationship status issue for their public launch, but they have bigger plans: public-education and legal drives to establish "the freedom to be OPEN about everyone important in your life."

From their Mission page:


OPEN is a nonprofit organization dedicated to normalizing and empowering non-monogamous individuals and communities. More than that, we’re a movement of people working toward a future where romantic and intimate relationships between consenting adults are accepted and protected regardless of relationship structure, gender identity, or sexual orientation. 

 

OPEN was founded in 2022 to serve the 5% of American adults who practice some form of ethical non-monogamy. Too often, ethically non-monogamous individuals lack access to communities of people like them, and are forced to hide their identity to avoid stigma and discrimination. We believe it’s time for that to end. Here's how:

 

  1. -- Change how the world perceives ethical non-monogamy by advancing cultural acceptance and representation

  2. -- Improve the practice of ethical non-monogamy by empowering communities, sharing knowledge, and building resources

  3. -- Grow the power of the ethically non-monogamous movement in order to gain rights and protections, support aligned movements, and shape a more just and loving world.

    OPEN is a small but mighty network of community leaders, advocates, professionals, and more working to foster the grassroots movement to normalize ethical non-monogamy. Stay tuned for the launch of our
    legislative campaigns, Non-monogamy Day of Visibility, events, and more!



Who are these people?


The three co-founders are Brett Chamberlin, a sustainability activist and mover & shaker for nonprofits (executive director); Sheila (Shade) DeBlonk, a political-campaign professional (board president); and Bryan (Lefty) DeBlonk, previously a lobbyist and political-campaign operative. The board of directors includes the respected poly-community figures Heath Schechinger (co-founder of the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition and co-chair of the American Psychological Association's Division 44 Committee on Consensual Non-monogamy); Luna Ray (founder and CEO of Bloom Community); and William Winters (founder, Bonobo Network).

Chamberlin shares his own story of how the project came together at the end of this post.1

So it looks like they've got a capable crew. They've raised over $10,000 to get rolling, and crowdfunding continues. Sign up to get on the mailing list for news and "opportunities to help grow the movement."

-----------------------------------------

What they're trying to become has been a long time coming.

Based on a revelatory, life-changing possibility, the polyamory movement has accomplished an amazing amount since it took shape 35 or so years ago. This happened slowly at first, then surprisingly fast in the last 10 or 15 years. And it happened with very little support structure, just a few small and scattered institutions, and practically no money.


The movement has never had a seriously effective broad organization of its own. That's what Loving More magazine set out to be 28 years ago when print magazines were king, but in the internet era its work pretty much condensed to putting on two conventions a year and smaller retreats, as well as media relations, webinars, and some local chapters. Loving More remains a two-person, part-time operation. The Polyamory Leadership Network started in 2008 at New York's Poly Pride Weekend with great hopes among activists to network and collaborate on projects. Dozens of ideas for projects emerged at the PLN's organizational meeting of 64 people in February 2009, but it soon became clear that ideas were cheap; volunteers willing and able to carry them to fruition were few. The PLN soon settled into what it has remained: a loose Google Group discussion list, increasingly diffused amid the growth of other social media and the widening of the poly world.

There are solid poly-friendly nonprofits like the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom, the Woodhull Freedom Foundation, and others, but they are not poly-specific. Special-focus organizations have recently sprung up, such as the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition and the Chosen Family Law Center, but these have their own particular focuses. The new Polyamory Foundation grants money to projects that other people and groups carry out; as a non-operating foundation it runs none of its own.

I can't think of any social-change movement of our size and popularity that doesn't have at least one big, strong organization, nonprofit or otherwise, helping to make it go.

Could that finally change?

-----------------------------------------

1.  I asked Brett Chamberlin how OPEN came to be. He wrote back this:

As to your question about our origin, I'm delighted to share more – and I hope you won't mind if I tell you that story from a bit of a personal perspective.

I'm a lifelong activist and organizer who for the last ten years has been working in sustainability advocacy, with a focus on waste and consumerism. I co-founded a national nonprofit (Post-Landfill Action Network), led the global grassroots distribution for an Emmy-winning documentary film ("The Story of Plastic,"), and even made a couple television appearances (CNN, NBC). But over the last couple years, I started to feel a bit like a cog in the nonprofit industrial complex. Although I was proud of the work I was doing, I felt like I was lacking a deep personal connection to the issues I was serving, and couldn't shake the sense that I was replaceable.

Meanwhile, I was leading somewhat of a double life as I found myself immersing deeper into the Bay Area polyamory and sex-positive culture. Through these communities, I was discovering new ways to heal and better myself, to care for those around me, and to love and be loved in new abundance. I came to feel that poly culture's emphasis on authentic connection, mutual growth, consent and communication, radical inclusion, transformative justice, compassion, and more were precisely the medicine that our society so deeply needs. 

The deeper I immersed myself into the culture of ethical non-monogamy, the more I became convinced of both the opportunity and need for deep organizing work in this space. I saw how many of my peers were forced to hide their identity and intimate relationships for fear of losing their jobs – even in progressive states like California! I also saw how much power and passion was present in our communities, and felt that the national ethically non-monogamous population could be mobilized to bring new energy into the broader struggles for social, economic, environmental, and racial justice. In short, I began to feel called to this work. 

As part of that journey, I began having more substantive conversations with my community leaders and "poly elders" about these topics – in particular, with Lefty and Shade, who ultimately became my co-founders on this project. Lefty and Shade (a married, polyamorous couple) are central leaders of the "And Then There's Only Love" Burning Man camp, which produces the Orgy Dome. They also happen to be political consultants based in Sacramento, who had their own experience leading a "double life" until they were "outed" in the national media thanks to an article in Drudge Report. They really validated the social impact lens that I was applying to this space, and affirmed that founding an organization to advance this work could indeed be viable.

In October 2021 I left my full-time job at the environmental nonprofit where I had been serving for five years. Shortly after the new year, I started convening meetings with Lefty and Shade to sketch out what would ultimately grow into OPEN; I also started reaching out to other politically-minded polyamorous leaders like Heath [Schechinger] and William Winters (Bonobo Network). To be clear, I don't mean to center myself too much in that telling. I view myself as a steward of a shared vision, who just happened to be lucky enough to be in the right place in my life to take this on, with a relevant background in social impact movement building and nonprofit leadership, and some incredible support and mentorship from our founding team (and my partners and broader community). I am humbled to be in this position, and am working hard to honor this opportunity and the broader community that OPEN exists to serve.

That's my story! Hope you don't mind the essay or the personal framing. Alan, thank you again for your instrumental support for this new enterprise – I'm deeply grateful for your support, and look forward to more collaboration ahead.

For a more loving world,
Brett Chamberlin


--------------------------------------

UPDATE:

Gotta hand it to these folks, they know how to do publicity. Their press release to the New York Times provoked a story in the Style section: Non-Monogamy Advocates Ask Facebook to Be More Open (June 17). The whole thing:


A group supporting those who practice polyamory and other forms of “ethical non-monogamy” want more relationship-status options on Facebook.

By Valeriya Safronova

A group that supports ethical non-monogamy sent an open letter to Meta on Thursday calling for Facebook to allow users to list more than one relationship status in their profiles.

The letter, which was initiated by the Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy, or OPEN, said that Facebook’s current policy is “arbitrary” and “exclusionary.” Signees included leaders of groups like the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom and the Center for Positive Sexuality.

A spokesman for Meta said the company was reviewing the letter and noted that one of the statuses that users can choose on Facebook is “in an open relationship.” The change the petitioners are asking for would allow them to list all of their romantic partners.

About 20 percent of people say they have engaged in some form of consensual non-monogamy, according to a 2017 study. Today, the term encompasses “a bajillion niche terms,” according to Brett Chamberlin, the executive director of OPEN. The most well-known terms include “polyamory,” which means dating multiple people at the same time [No, it means multiple loving relationships with the knowledge and agreement of everyone --Ed.], and “swinging,” which describes when people in relationships exchange partners with each other [sometimes].

A newer entry is “relationship anarchy,” in which participants break down all the expected norms involved in romantic relationships and subscribe only to rules established by the people involved. [Okay, she got one right.]

“Ethical non-monogamy is nothing new, but technologies like the internet have made it easier for people to build communities and pursue lifestyles that may not have been accepted in a mainstream culture before,” Mr. Chamberlin said.

Today, people interested in opening their relationships can turn to podcasts and polyamory coaches for advice, and join dating apps like Feeld and #open to meet like-minded others. Consensual non-monogamy has even reached Vogue magazine, where one writer asked: “Is Monogamy Over?[No, only the magazine's headline writer wrote that; it was clickbait.]

People have become more public about their non-monogamous relationships, too, writing articles and social media posts about their experiences.

Last month, Taylor Frankie Paul, a TikTok star with 3.6 million followers, talked about her open marriage in a livestream. Ms. Paul, a member of the Mormon Church, told viewers that she and her husband and some of their friends would engage in “soft swinging,” in which “you don’t fully switch and go all the way.” Ms. Paul also said that she and her husband were currently in the process of getting a divorce, partly prompted by Ms. Paul’s decision to break the rules of their agreement.

The most prominent people who have publicly discussed their experiences with non-monogamy may be Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith. Last year Mr. Smith told GQ about a period during which his marriage was open.

“We have given each other trust and freedom, with the belief that everybody has to find their own way,” the actor said. “And marriage for us can’t be a prison.” Willow Smith, the couple’s daughter, spoke about being polyamorous on “Red Table Talk,” a show she hosts with her mother and grandmother.

Part of the shift toward more acceptance could be generational. In a YouGov poll that surveyed about 1,340 people and asked them to describe their “ideal relationship” along a scale from “completely monogamous” to “completely non-monogamous,” 43 percent of millennials said their ideal relationship would be at least somewhat non-monogamous, compared with 30 percent of Gen Xers and 25 percent of baby boomers.

Despite the growing normalization of non-monogamy as a practice, Mr. Chamberlin said, many people who engage in it still fear being public about their lifestyles.

“You could be fired from your job, denied housing or lose a custody battle based on the structure of your intimate relationships,” he said. The goal of his organization, which he and two others founded in April, is to raise awareness and create more acceptance of non-monogamous relationships.

“Over the long run, one of the projects of culture and society is giving people more space to be in the consensual relationships they choose,” he said. He pointed to the movement for L.G.B.T.Q. rights as one of those projects. Consensual non-monogamy, he added, “is the next chapter.”

And now the Times article is prompting coverage other places: Yahoo News, the UK's Independent, the Times of India, Quartz, and elsewhere.
  
_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________

[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , , ,