Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



March 1, 2025

Happy triad home life. Two new books, more poly reality TV... and, polyworld perspective on the current crisis


Not much polyamory in the news lately with everything else going on. Such as, umm.... 
For a poly-informed take on the picture and our little place in it, scroll down and start at the Ukraine flag.

The tl;dr: When autocrats are overthrowing your country,  do not show fear; fear is contagious. Courage is contagious too, and it's better for you. Act accordingly.

Get the little handbook On Tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. Connect with your local pro-democracy groups, now, to start building mutual support. Grow your community networks. Develop strategic thinking; the winners are the accurate far-seers. Buck up, as modeled in the videos from people in a harder spot than us. Find your own good place in the fight, and relish it. Snowflakes are miserable and get nowhere, but fighters have purpose and meaning, even fun.

It's only starting.

Yes we do, poly networks especially. Near the White House on January 18.
 (Jon Cherry/Reuters)



 
------------------------------


Meanwhile, back to the blog topic.


  The oldest, most familiar type of polyamory coverage in legacy media is the local newspaper profiling a local polyfamily. Especially around Valentine's Day, especially if there are kids. So... this in from the San Antonio Express-News: 'Married' throuple living domestic life in San Antonio are 'powerhouse trio', Feb. 14.

These never grow old.

The triad pledging their mutual vows three years ago. "When they arrived at
the altar, they were greeted by a circle of friends and family — a seating
arrangement intended to symbolize the unification of their families."
Anthony Garcia / Jojodancerphotos   

By Rhyma Castillo

...“We like to call it ‘the power of three,’ ” said Delain, 44, who works in sales operations at a global tech company. “When we work together, we can knock out pretty much anything.”
 
The San Antonio throuple walked one another down the aisle in spring 2022 at a wedding ceremony in front of their closest friends and family.
    
...Blanca and Phillip met at San Antonio ISD’s Highlands High School in 1990. She was a freshman and he was a senior, and they began dating after two years of friendship. ...

[A quarter century later] “We started trying to meet other couples, just trying to date,” Blanca said. “For me, it was figuring out my sexuality. How much am I willing to explore with my husband there, and how open are we about having this conversation?”

Phillip says they weren’t looking for sexual relationships that night, but when they ran into Delain on one of their outings in March 2017, the couple was “intrigued” by her. 

Blanca, Delain, and Philip. "Certainly, we’ve lost friends along the way.
They can go (expletive) themselves."





















It was at a Shovels and Rope concert at Sam's Burger Joint, Blanca said. She knew Delain through work, but seeing her in a different setting sparked something new — physical attraction. Delain was hot. “She’s very intriguing, very gorgeous,” Blanca said. “Phillip was like, ‘Who is that?’ So I introduced them, and we hit it off.”
 
“When I met Blanca and Phillip, I had no idea what polyamory was,” Delain said. She’d just made a post-divorce move to San Antonio with her two sons, now 24 and 14, and said she was on a date with someone else when she ran into the pair.

“I thought, ‘I can’t tell if these people are hitting on me, or if I’m making new friends,’” she said.
Within weeks, Delain confirmed it was the former when Blanca suddenly kissed her at a Sons of Hercules concert.

"We were in a grimy dive bar bathroom on the St. Mary's Strip," Blanca said. "Delain asked me how I stay looking so young, and I told her 'by kissing pretty girls like you.'"

"That's when I knew," Delain said. “That’s what broke the ice."

“We loved spending every moment we possibly could together,” Blanca said. “We couldn’t get enough of one another, and it didn’t disrupt (mine and Phillip’s) relationship. It just felt very comfortable and natural.”

...The three say they've managed the stresses with plenty of open, honest communication. “We wanted to make sure everyone felt comfortable, and we just fell into this rhythm,” Delain said.

After nearly a year of courtship, the triad merged households in May 2018. Quickly, the relationship dynamic switched from parties, concerts, gallery openings and Piñata Protest concerts to laundry, gardening and H-E-B runs. 

For Valentine's Day, the throuple plans to make dinner at home with their 14-year-old son — and to give one another copious amounts of flowers.

If that sounds pretty tame, well, it is. Blanca likes to thrift; Delain likes to garden and volunteer at the dog shelter; and Phillip has his art. They love to binge-watch TV, and they're revisiting "Top Chef" at the moment. 

---------------------------

...When Blanca, Delain and Phillip decided to be open about their relationship and lifestyle after moving in together, they were met with mixed reactions.

“Our kids were way more accepting of our relationship than we could have ever imagined,” Delain said.
One of the triad's children, Violet Luna, 24, identifies as polyamorous herself. She said her parents' relationship taught her important lessons about how to love with patience, compassion and understanding.

"They set an incredible example for me," Violet said. "I've learned so much through observing how they love one another."

"With Delain joining our family, I have two more siblings now — more celebrations, more birthdays, more dinners," Violet said. "I call her my 'bonus mom' because she's another mom to go to. I'm in a bigger community now with so much love."

However, the triad’s parents and a few of their now-former friends weren’t exactly convinced, they say.
“They’ve all managed to say something offensive at some point,” she added. ...

...[In 2022] they created their own marriage certificate, which all five of Blanca, Delain and Phillip’s children signed as witnesses.

“We all felt like this was a long-term, forever thing,” Blanca said. “It was important for us to feel like we were part of a unit.”


















Polyamory Advice

For polyamorous partners in general, the triad agree it’s important to find community with those who love and accept you.

For Delain, that meant making changes so she could be open and honest about her relationship, which meant “questioning the community I was choosing to be in,” she said. “If I can’t be honest about who I love, then this isn’t where I want to be.”

Phillip said he's had to dispel doubts among his peers: At first, they thought “Oh, this is just another thing that he’s doing, it’ll pass. Let’s not pay attention to it,” Phillip said. “But then they see us and our dynamic, and they go, ‘Wow, what a powerhouse trio.’ ”

For Blanca, finding community meant being able to share her life with the people to whom she’s closest — without fear of shame or judgment: “I made it clear to my parents, siblings and peers that this is my family, and this is how you can accept us,” she said.

“Certainly, we’ve lost friends along the way,” Blanca said. “They can go (expletive) themselves.”



  A surprisingly solid new book: Polyamory for Dummies.

Wiley's "For Dummies" series has a spotty reputation. After its early success, critics say the publisher expanded the line too fast and quality dropped. But if so, the long-expected Polyamory For Dummies, finally out, looks to be a stellar exception.

That's because of its stellar author, Dr. Jaime Marie Grant, PhD. She's a brilliant sex and relationship educator as well as a 15-year polyamory practitioner, a researcherpodcaster, and relationship coach and proudly queer. She was the primary investigator for America's first national survey on discrimination against trans and non-binary people (2011). She's now on a speaking tour.

Jaime M. Grant

She thanks her editor for, apparently,  letting her ignore some of the rigid directions to For Dummies authors. Maybe they've learned.

First-look impressions: The book is large, 352 pages. It's packed with easily findable information judging from the Introduction and Chapters 1, 2, and 3 and its very large table of contents and index. (If either link fails to load, click the "read sample" button under the cover pictures.)  I've ordered the book and will have more to say when it arrives.


  Another new book: The Non-Monogamy Playbook: Exploring Polyamory and Open Relationships with Confidence, by Ruby Rare. She's a well-known UK sex educator, author  and podcaster. For the arrival of her latest book, the Daily Mail published a Poly 101 she wrote and titled it  I turned my back on 'normal' relationships and now I'm happier than ever in a 'polycule' with six sexy friends. This is my guide to non-monogamy... (Jan. 30).


Ruby Rare

...There’s often a presumption that in straight-presenting relationships, it’s the men who initiate opening things up.

But in my experience, it’s overwhelmingly more common for women to be the ones keen to do so.*  Lots of women have been empowered by the sex-positive movement to question their wants and desires. ...

...Rare is an ambassador for Brook, the UK-based sexual health charity, the National LGBTQ+ Partnership’s Women’s Health Week, and co-founder of life drawing collective Body Love Sketch Club.

She said: “ENM is a subject very close to my heart. It’s great to see a growing cultural interest in these less conventional relationship styles, and I can’t wait to share my professional insights and personal experiences. Expect a book that’s curious, encouraging and rooted in kindness and community.”

...Hayes said: "This book will be essential reading for anyone curious about exploring consensual non-monogamy, and how to navigate multiple relationships with confidence and compassion. Ruby is such a positive and empowering role model for cultivating loving, healthy connection." 


Table of contents, introduction, and Chapter 1. (If this fails to load click the "read sample" button under the cover picture.) Her first book was Sex Ed: A Guide for Adults (2020).

* That contradicts a YouGov poll in 2021 about non-monogamy interest among 23,000 U.S. adults. YouGov polls are not throwaways despite being internet-based; they have a rep for scientific methodology and, in elections at least, they're usually in line with live polls.


 









      



Perhaps the contradiction is explained by a famous poly-couples trope: The men push for it first, then freak when faced with real people rather than fantasies. Meanwhile the women discover they like the real-people part, take over and make it work.  


  Is this reality? The TLC network claims big things for the first would-be committed triads on its reality show "90-Day Fiancé."  TLC’s “90 Day Fiancé” is making history with the series’ first throuple (New York Daily News, Feb. 14).

The setup:


Why does the publicity still give me a sinking feeling?
Using a 90-day fiancé [K1] visa, overseas fiancés will travel to the US to live with their partners for the first time. Each couple will have just 90 days to decide to get married or send their international mate home.


From a TLC press release,


...The threesome has been dating for over a year, and now Matt, Amani and Any are looking to make their relationship permanent. To do so, however, means Matt and Amani must divorce to move forward with the K1 visa, allowing one of them to marry Any and finally bring her to the U.S.  First, they will travel to Mexico to spend more time with Any's family and friends and confirm they are making the right decision in their relationship journey.


It's a classic unicorn setup, but don't judge too quick. Unicorn triads starting with a couple sometimes do work well for all concerned — if each person fully grasps the famous pitfalls of this structure, if they're fearlessly clear with themselves and each other about what they want and expect, and if each knows how to protect their personal boundaries, interests, and agency while also living from a generous heart.

Will that be these people? My bet is no. This is a reality show, designed for drama.


  Not unrelated: Coincidentally, sociologist Eli Sheff just wrote about a too-frequent situation she has observed where things all go wrong at once: The Polyamorous Perfect Storm, "an interaction pattern that can spoil long-term multiple-partner relationships."


Elisabeth Sheff

[My] Longitudinal Polyamorous Family Study has followed a group of respondents since 1996 as they raise their families in multiple-partner relationships. It focused on the well-being of children raised in polyamorous families and the ways in which polyamorous relationships impact adults across their lifespans. Among the fascinating data this study has produced, some repeated patterns of interaction have emerged in the findings. One of these is the "perfect storm."

The perfect storm pattern begins with a long-term polyamorous relationship in which the partners have been together for years or perhaps decades.... It is usually their deepest, longest-term, and/or most intimate relationship.... These devoted partners often develop a pattern where they rely on each other for emotional and practical support, intimacy, and perhaps sex. If something traumatic happens in their lives or they simply have a bad day, their beloved partner is the first one they go to for support.

[Example from her data:] Morgan and Kai have been polyamorous for 15 years and, while they have had their ups and downs, it has been pretty great overall. Then something bad happens to Morgan—they lose their job, hair, figure, beloved parent, mobility, or something that has a lasting negative impact. ...While Morgan is dealing with aftermath of the event, Kai meets JP and they really click, with lots of chemistry and exciting conversations. Morgan’s needs for comfort, attention, and support go up just as Kai’s attention is drawn to JP.

Kai and JP ... do not mean to neglect Morgan, but they are simply captivated with each other and might fail to notice how much Morgan is hurting. Morgan then becomes increasingly upset, angry, and insecure, which makes communication even more difficult. This can be compounded if JP is somehow “better” than Morgan—at least in Morgan’s imagination. ...

...Another respondent had just had a baby and was feeling insecure about the changes to her body and upset with sleep deprivation. Her beloved’s new partner was a semi-professional dancer who spent hours in the rehearsal studio working out and enjoyed dancing socially. ... The new mom felt stuck and compared herself quite negatively to the dancer....

Managing the Aftermath

Depending on how everyone handles it, the relationship might implode spectacularly, or the people involved may address the issues in an effective way that allows them to move forward together even stronger and more resilient than before. That second outcome is far more likely to happen when the people involved have deep trust in each other, great communication skills, and excellent self-soothing abilities.

When things go poorly, the relationship can disintegrate completely. ...

When things go well, everyone involved in the perfect storm is able to have effective conversations where they listen deeply to each other, empathize with each other’s feelings, and are able to negotiate equitable agreements that meet everyone’s needs to the greatest extent possible. ... but Morgan and Kai’s discussions are the most critical because that is the root of the issue. ... 

It can be especially helpful if Morgan already has a significant support network and/or other partners that can increase their support. ...



  Being a natural low-jealousy person certainly helps with polyamory, but it's not required. A CNN Health podcast interviews poly/ENM coach Dr. Joli Hamilton about her own struggle: Jealousy is trying to tell you something. Five tips for handling it with grace (Feb. 17). Audio and transcript.


“I made every mistake possible when I shifted my own relational paradigm from monogamy to polyamory 15 years ago,” she said. “I made this switch for a reason; I knew it called to me … but it hurt so much. Jealousy was a big part of why it hurts so much. And my way of getting out of problems is to study. So, I thought I have to learn my way out of this. ...”


And watch Hamilton's TedX talk on compersion.



Aside from the overclaiming false headline, it's an example of a decent mainstream orientation for newcomers.


By Nikita Kanyal

...The marriage rates have been consistently falling for many years, with millennials taking the forefront in remaining unmarried. ...

Why? ... Divorce rates scared them off ... Financial uncertainty [versus] expensive weddings ... 

While marriage is on the decline, alternative relationship styles are booming. Open relationships, polyamory, and “situationships” are becoming more mainstream, fueled by social media, dating apps, and cultural shifts.

– Monogamy vs. Freedom: The Great Debate...

    – The Case for Open Relationships...
    – One person doesn’t have to be your “everything”...
    – Fosters communication and self-awareness; non-monogamous relationships often require deep conversations about boundaries, desires, and expectations.

– The Case Against Open Relationships...

    – Jealousy is real. ...
    – If you’re seeking other people because you’re unhappy, it may just be avoidance. ...
    – Most societies still value monogamy. Non-monogamy is still widely judged, which can create social stigma. ...

Some believe this shift is just a phase, while others argue we’re witnessing a permanent transformation of modern relationships. ...



  And here's a boost for a warning on Threads, posted by alltheroadworks:


If a man is actually "teaching you about polyamory" ethically,  he'll be pointing you towards a stack of well-respected books on the topic, taking you to poly community meetups, getting you to join online poly discussion groups, and introducing you to other poly people who will tell you when he's talking shit, rather than just feeding you his own opinions. ...


Replied infinitepolyam,


If you date men and are new to polyamory or consider yourself not very experienced, please please please beware of polyamorous men who claim to have a good understanding of polyamory or have been polyamorous a long time, ready to teach you how.

I’m not saying don’t date these men, but I suggest being cautious with what they tell you. If they say/do something that feels a bit off and tell you something like “That’s just how polyamory is,” please view that for the likely red flag it is.


Pass it on.


-------------------------------------------------------


Well doesn't this seem prescient now.

(BTW, get on the 50501 mailing list.)







    
Bolton: Trump has effectively surrendered to Putin in Ukraine negotiations (CNN interview). John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, traveled with Trump to that weirdly subservient meeting Trump had in 2018 with Putin in Helsinki.


I've ended these polyamory posts with Ukraine for almost three years now. At first some of you didn't get it. Now that Russia's socio-fascist, patrimonialist allies have seized power in America and elsewhere, more of you do.

The 80-year postwar consensus is dead. We've entered a world struggle for whether free and open societies, or brutal illiberal oligarchies, will rule the 21st century. What's happening in America is only a part of it; authoritarian rulers around the world have been linking up with direct mutual support that is stated out loud.

And the events in Washington, planned and carried out by Americans, resemble nothing so much as a decapitation strike.

I've seen too many progressive movements die out, or get wiped out, because they failed to scan the wider world accurately and understand their position in it strategically. We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, depends on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives and identities, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Such a society is possible only where people have agency to create their own lives without fear, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, who "choose to live within the truth," and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the world's authoritarians. 

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by censorship, intimidation, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, stacked courts and agencies, legal erasure, shifts of wealth to the super-rich, and sometimes, eventually, artillery.

Vote for Ukraine Aid protest signs outside the US Capitol
For what it's worth, Polyamory in the News received more pagereads from pre-invasion Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For those of us born since World War II this is the most consequential war of our lifetime. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional  inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine. All sides worldwide now are watching what we will do.


The coming times may require hard things of us here. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. 

Here's an easy start: Get on the 50501 email list: https://www.fiftyfifty.one/. It stands for 50 states, 50 protests, 1 movement. The next national action is March 4th. USA Today article on its who and what.  Pix.  Also: Join your local Indivisible, or at least download its guide for practical good-citizen strategies and tactics.

Stop moping and buck up. Play this, and this, and this, by people heading into a scarier part of the fight than you or I will face. Eight thousand more, sorted on just that one song by Shadow Phoenix. (lyrics)

Some people on the Western world's eastern front trying to hold onto an open society. (TW: war is awful.) Maybe your granddad did this from a trench facing Hitler's tanks — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 20th century.

But the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years then either. Popular history remembers the 1945 victory over the Nazis and the joyous homecoming. Less remembered are the defeats and grim prospects from 1939 through early 1943.

Some Americans have felt called there, because they were more able than most. They will be remembered forever as heroes for goodness and humanity. By comparison, the rest of us have it easy.

Remember, the Ukrainians say they are doing this for us too. They are correct. The global struggle between a brighter future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, ‘A Big Step Back’: In Ukraine, Concerns Mount Over Narrowing Press Freedoms. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. And they're stamping hard on the old culture of everyday, petty corruption.  More on that.  More; "Ukraine shows that real development happens when people believe they have an ownership stake in their own societies."

Wrote US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic early in the war, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”

They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

It's this tough.  "You've lived your life — go to the front!"
Army recruiting pamphlets for oldsters at a kiosk
in a train station.

----------------------------------

Social attitudes in Ukraine are mostly traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church. But in the last generation the ideal of modern European civil society has become widely treasured. The status of women has fast advanced throughout society, especially post-invasion. More than 43,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, not just in support roles and as drone pilots but as combat officers, artillery gunners, tankers, battlefield medics, snipers, and infantry. Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, with official approval, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay." A report on Ukraine's LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutionsAnotherAnotherAnother. War changes things.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our full support for them to win their security, freedom, and future. Speak up for it. Like, right now.
                                     
A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."


Ukrainian women soldiers in dense undergrowth
Women defenders on our world's eastern front

PPS:  U.S. authori-tarians, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, say that allowing even the most capable women into front-line roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Ukraine puts that shit to bed. Do you have a relative who talks like that? Send them this video link to Vidma, a junior lieutenant who commands a mortar platoon, recounting one of their many battles.

Update Feb. 13, 2025: More than two years later Vidma is still alive, still at the front, and posting TikToks. Her mortar unit has graduated to heavy artillery. A young girl who looks high-school age showed up to join themanother vid with her. Their lives, and their promising society, depend on us. 

And maybe our own? Says Maine's independent Senator Angus King,


Whenever people write to my office [asking why we are supporting Ukraine,] I answer, 'Google Sudetenland, 1938.' We could have stopped a murderous dictator who was bent on geographic expansion…at a relatively low cost. The result of not doing so was 55 million deaths.

                                          
[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,



February 28, 2025

Today is Metamour Day! Share it out.


And why February 28?
Because it's Valentine's Day times two!

"Happy Metamour Day" card with cartoon of four hugging people making faces

The point of Metamour Day? "Honoring Polyamory's Most Distinctive Relationships."

This got rolling six years ago by the National Coalition for Sexual FreedomThe idea was originally hatched two years earlier, posts cartoonist Anna D. Hirsch, a.k.a. PositivelyPolyAnna. She writes, 

"In 2017, I dreamed about a holiday to celebrate metamours. I bought the URLs MetamourDay.com and WorldMetamourDay.com. ... I was stoked to learn in 2019 that Keira Harbison, having the same important idea, along with the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom launched a Metamour Day initiative, ​declaring February 28 as the day. Later, I shared some of my art with NCSF for their 2020 greeting card contestI am so happy that this idea is growing.


So why is this a big deal?

Because look at that slogan: Honoring polyamory's most distinctive relationships.

Which is precisely on target.


Your metamour is your lover's other lover. The defining aspect of polyamory – the thing that distinguishes it from other forms of consensual non-monogamy such as open relationships and swinging – is the sense that your metas are significant full persons in regard to you, who require, at minimum, your consideration, respect, and basic good will. 

Even if you hardly know them and/or don't much like them, and even if ordinary politeness is as far as you go. A lot like extended family. Because polyamory carries an implicit ethic that for better or worse, "We're all in this together."

And of course, there's no limit to how close you and your metas may become. 

No other model of romantic love 
– that magical thing that has enraptured and tormented and driven humanity since humanity began – generalizes its magic into something broader, beyond the private couple-box where most societies have fearfully and rigorously packed it away.

Consider, for instance, that the basic human emotion of compersion did not even have a word until roughly 1980.

●  From Elisabeth Sheff's Metamour Day article a while back, Delighting in Your Beloveds’ Other Lovers:


For more than 20 years I have been studying polyamorous families with kids, and I have seen them face the usual difficulties that come with life – illness, economic challenges, divorce, disability, and the like. What has stood out to me about these families who remain together in long-term polycules – some of them for 60 or more years – is that the metamour relationships make or break the family over the long term. These emotionally intimate, non-sexual chosen family relationships are so important in polyamorous families that I made up the word polyaffective to describe them.

Positive polyaffective relationships among metamours who become chosen family over time are the backbone of the poly family. Metamours who can’t stand each other and are never able to establish comfort (much less delight) in each others’ presence are not going to happily coexist over the long term. Metamours who add value to each others’ lives, however, can not only support each other when life inevitably throws them a curve ball, but also support the polyamorous relationship with their mutual partner if it falls on hard times.

...By promoting Metamour Day, NCSF hopes “to foster positive relationships between you and your metamours, whatever that might look like. It is not about forced compersion. It’s about communal appreciation within our family structures."

If you are lucky enough to have a metamour with whom you share compersion, celebrate them on February 28!


●  That bit about "the metamour relationships make or break the family over the long term"? That's not just Sheff's observation of the families in her own long-term study. Joanna Iwanowska of the University of Warsaw has published a paper titled Metamour Connections as the Underpinning of the Fabric of Polyamory.

"These bonds are significant and constitutive of polyamory," she writes;


...Polyamory stresses not so much the openness to having multiple romantic relationships, but the openness to having metamour relationships with other people. It is this second kind of openness – the openness to metamour contact and communication – that singles out a polyamorous person among other people who might be open to a multiplicity of romantic and/or sexual relationships, e.g. from such a monogamist who leads a double life.

...In a paper that appeared in the Journal of Applied Philosophy, Luke Brunning (2016) writes that “the presence of a third party is a constitutive feature of polyamory” (p. 9), and the third party is typically one’s metamour or a potential metamour. ... In addition to that, I argue that accepting the prospect of one’s partner dating another person entails agreeing to be in a relationship with this person, even if this relationship might remain indirect....  Metamour connections are the underpinning of the fabric of polyamory, and they deserve as much academic attention and research as the polyamorous romantic connections. ...


●  Metamour Day: Celebrating Relational Ecosystems of Care, just up from polycoach and author Aria Diana, on her substack Navigating Non-Monogamy (Feb. 25). "Plus, an update on our metamour book club."



At a time when key cultural and diversity events like Pride Month, Black History Month, and Indigenous People’s Month are being quietly erased from Google Calendars, here’s a holiday that might not even be on your radar: Metamour Day. ...

...Metamour Day celebrates the relationships we share with our partners’ partners—connections that range from deep friendship to respectful distance. It’s a reminder that love exists in ecosystems, not silos, and that the way we relate to one another shapes our broader communities.

...Growing up as the only girl with two brothers, I never imagined I’d later experience something like sisterhood through non-monogamy. But the truth is, there’s a kindred intimacy that sometimes develops in metamour connections—one that mainstream culture offers no script for.

In this season of my life, I’m grateful for two incredible metamours who I adore: Bexx, my nesting partner Skye’s other partner (I wrote about our first polyamorous Christmas back in December), and Salina, my sweetie Justin’s wife (who you may know from our book club video series). In monogamous frameworks, these women would be framed as my competition, even my enemies. But nothing could be further from reality.

Instead, we share something rare and radical. We text each other for support when one of us is struggling, celebrate each other’s wins, and sometimes, we just sit in the tenderness of knowing what it means to care about the same person.

"Enjoying the company of my two fabulous metamours, Bexx and Salina."


















Polyamory isn’t just about expanding who we can love romantically—it’s about expanding how we love, period. It’s a quiet revolution against the idea that love is a zero-sum game, that security is found in exclusion, that the only way to be safe is to control. 

...In an increasingly hostile, war-driven, violence-plagued world, polyamory is proof that peace is possible when we lead with love in the places we've been told we should compete.



● A basic, practical Metamours 101 in Cosmopolitan: Metamours: everything to know about your lover’s lover (Mar. 12, 2024)


By Ali Wunderman

At some point as a non-monogamous person, you will very likely experience a new person entering your life via your partner. Congrats, this means you now have a metamour!

...In ethical non-monogamy, having metamours is part of the goal. Multiple people come with the territory, and they too may bring even more people into the mix, making those who are less familiar with the polyamorous lifestyle confused about how things are supposed to work.

So while metamours can bring various joys and challenges with them, it’s not as complicated as it might seem. As is the case with any non-monogamous relationship – and ideally monogamous ones, too – healthy doses of communication and honesty are the key to harmony. So let’s answer some of the biggest questions people have about what life with metamours looks like. ...

There is a misunderstanding that your partner’s lover must share an intimate relationship with you too. But a metamour is first and foremost your partner’s partner, not yours. It’s true that sometimes the relationship can evolve to bring you all together, but that happens circumstantially. In fact, it’s a red flag if the central partner tries to force a friendship or romantic connection between their lovers where one would not exist naturally.

...Writing professor Patricia Fancher, says she got along so well with her husband’s girlfriend – her metamour – that the girlfriend became more like her husband’s metamour instead. “We just liked each other so much that the relationship shifted,” she says.

Cavan Images

You don’t have to do anything you don’t want to do, but it’s worthwhile examining your motivation in making this decision either way: Is avoiding meeting them a way to pretend they don’t exist? Is getting together for coffee at the beginning of the relationship a way to exert control? Do you subconsciously want to ensure your partner’s connection with them involves you on some level?

...Meeting a metamour can be the best way to bring them down from that pedestal you may have placed them on, while showing support for your partner’s choices. Fancher recalls the insecurity she felt around her first metamour, a younger, blonde woman she believed was everything Fancher was not. Before meeting, it was easy to idealise her metamour as, “this mythical person who is better at sex, better at listening, a better cook, doesn’t awkwardly laugh – all these magical, special things because you make up in your head.”

Once she, her husband, and her metamour started getting drinks together, it became easier to remember that metamours are humans first and foremost. This approach is called “kitchen table polyamory" and it’s the idea that everyone in the same poly network can comfortably socialise around a kitchen table.

...“When you approach them with an open heart, you’re able to better establish trust, set boundaries, and feel confident in your partner’s love for you.”

In doing so, you’ll be able to help their metamour be more comfortable, while also establishing a line of open communication. ...

“Communication is the key to any successful relationship, especially in a relationship with a metamour,” says Dr. Poppel. Staying quiet does no one any favors, least of all yourself. ...



● An excerpt from Rachel Krantz's book Open: One Woman's Journey Through Love and Polyamory, published by Business Insider as My partner and I opened our relationship, and I was surprised by how close I became with his girlfriend (July 11, 2024)


When my partner Adam asked what I thought of his girlfriend Leah coming out to visit for his birthday, I pragmatically decided to view it as the next step on my path.

I'd read in The Smart Girl's Guide to Polyamory that one of the best ways to combat jealousy was to meet your metamour. Since she would be coming to visit for a week in August (a whole week straight!), I decided to reach out. And thus began the most texting-intensive relationship of my life.

...We dished about sex (except sex with Adam) in the kind of detail I'd seen on "Sex and the City." Was it because we shared the same man? Were we backhand bragging? Bonding? All of the above, I'd suspect. ... I soon became very protective of Leah's well-being, a sort of on-call counselor. I found she was sometimes even more anxious, insecure, and neurotic than I was, which was really rather impressive/a little disturbing. Is this Adam's type? No matter. ...



●  A reading: What I Learned From Dinner With My Husband's Girlfriend (SheKnows, Aug. 25, 2023)

Ekaterina Popova/ Getty
















By Trish Fancher

She was terrifying. A tall, blonde, vegan who was seven years younger than me — and she never wore a bra. She was my husband’s girlfriend.

...After they were dating for a few weeks, all three of us met for a drink at a run-down bar on the harbor. I wore a flowing yellow dress that showed off at least four inches of cleavage. I put on new lipstick and clenched my jaw. She arrived wearing a colorful flowing dress as well. She was certainly tall, blonde, and beautiful. I felt she was different from me in every way. ...

Over popcorn and wine, I remembered she was just a person, not a threat. Later, she’d become a friend. Now, dinner with my metamours—the polyam term for the partner of my partner—is an enriching part of my life.

----------------------------------- 

...Until we sat down and shared a meal together, Per’s girlfriend was a threat — but in reality that threat was a figment of my imagination. Meeting her dispelled a fantasy. She wasn’t trying to take anything from me. She was a smart woman with her own life, needs, and desires. She could relate to Per about emotional experiences I didn’t understand. They added to each other’s happiness.

Now, these kinds of dinners are the norm and a source of joy. I practice “kitchen table polyamory,” which means that I hope all of my partners can, at the least, enjoy a nice meal together from time to time as friends. We have a group chat titled “In Pod We Trust”, a hold-over from when we were podded together earlier in the pandemic.

...Now, polyamory is an important and enriching part of my life. I still make mistakes: I hurt people and I get hurt. Deeply vulnerable relationships often include both joy and broken hearts. And it was often my metamours who helped me feel safe and cared for through the process. ...

My connections with my metamours are uniquely vulnerable and loving. My polyam community is my chosen family. We keep choosing each other and these complicated connections—with life-long loves, deep seated insecurities, heart breaks, and frequent tough conversations. We don’t choose each other because it’s easy. We choose each other because, through our complicated relationships, we can be deeply vulnerable and cared for.

This week, my entire polyam family was out of quarantine [after covid cases] for the first time in weeks. My ex-boyfriend’s wife texted our In Pod We Trust text thread to plan a picnic. Together with Per, his girlfriend, her husband and boyfriend, my ex and his wife, we feasted on a dinner of chips, hummus, figs, and pastries. We celebrated our recovery with the people with whom we can be the most vulnerable — and the people who know best how to care for me.


● From The Establishment, a women's site on Medium.com, Why You Should Meet Your Partner’s Lovers

By Kit O'Connell

Two months ago, my lovers met over tacos.

...I was confident they’d get along. Besides the obvious, they have several things in common: They both love cats, feminism, and, of course, Tex-Mex food. This would give us at least three topics to talk about, even if things got awkward.

Why Meeting Metamours Matters

...In my experience and for many polyamorous folk I know, meeting other lovers can alleviate jealousy and reduce relationship drama. Until you meet, “the other” is a scary unknown; if we let our imaginations run away, we can inflate them into something perfect and unattainable, and most importantly, better than me. But when you do meet, you find out they’re just another human.

“Keeping them at arm’s length, never experiencing their actual humanity as a person, limits the potential of that relationship,” said Kiki Christie, a polyamorous and sex positive relationship educator from Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

“One of my early relationships was with a couple that was married,” Kiki told me. “I got to know my partner’s wife really well. They were living in a different city, so every time I went to visit him I would spend time with her, because it was at their home.”

Because they shared each other’s company so often, she felt safe bringing up problems and dealing with difficult emotions.

“Being in a familiar relationship with my partner’s partner, with her, meant that I felt more open about talking about my feelings to both of them. I didn’t feel like my communication had to be mitigated at all,” Kiki said. “If I had an issue I could speak directly.”

Anna Hirsch
Genuine affection and connection blossomed between Kiki and her partner’s wife. They became such close friends that “we spent some holiday time together without my partner around. We just became very comfortable with each other. In fact he and I broke up, and she and I are still very good friends.”
Like Kiki, I shared a partner with a metamour for years. Our relationship remained platonic, but the intimacy we formed was genuine. We even had pet names for each other. The friendship outlasted our mutual relationship too, and we even got matching tattoos.

As Kiki said of her friendship, “It was its own relationship and it ultimately enhanced the poly relationship.”

Challenges And Fears

...“There’s going to be metamours that you don’t really click with, that you don’t want to be friends with, or that you might not even like all that much,” [Kiki] cautioned. “So how do you manage to still have a sustainable relationship through that? Focusing on people as individuals can help.”

...Even when I’ve felt jealous of one of my metamours, witnessing their small gestures of kindness and affection together during a meeting helps me open my heart to a better understanding of what my partner sees in them. When I’m challenged by difficult emotions, I focus on my partner’s happiness and often find I can share in it a little.

As Kiki explained, mutual respect is key when metamour relationships are challenging:

“If you’re constantly thinking of this person as someone who’s attached to my partner, or someone you’re not relating to one-on-one as an individual, even if you don’t particularly get along with them or see eye-to-eye with them, you’re not giving them or the relationship the respect it deserves. It’s like a relationship with a coworker you don’t get along with — you still have to see them as a person.”

Especially when there’s tension or distrust, we both believe metamour meetings can be crucial. ...


Small bumpersticker from Cafepress



●  And lastly, a warning: Metamour relations cannot be forced. You need to allow them to find their natural level.

Many metas have little or no interest in each other's company, and that's okay. No matter how much you may wish they did. Overbearing pressure for closeness between unwilling metas is a Known Creepy Thing. Open the door, yes. Invite them in, yes. But don't try to drag someone through that door. There is something more important than love, and that is respect.  
[Permalink]

Labels: ,