Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



February 25, 2026

Three new cities to enact poly anti-discrimination laws. Scientific American writes us up well. Two NY Times stories. Upcoming movie, and more.


●  Three more cities seem certain to pass polyamory and chosen-family anti-discrimination measures in the coming days.

Folks from the Seattle Coalition for Family and Relationship Equity
at their June 2025 Liberating Love Festival.






















News arrived this morning (Feb. 25) from Brett Chamberlin of OPEN:


Right now, we're on the verge of doubling the number of people living in cities with protections for non-monogamous families and relationships.

Olympia, WA  – Passed first reading unanimously last night; final passage expected Tuesday March 3.

Portland, OR  – First reading today (Wednesday Feb. 25); final passage expected Wednesday March 4.

West Hollywood, CA  – First reading Monday March 2; final passage expected March 16  


These measures prohibit discrimination in housing, employment, and other areas due to "family or relationship structure." Similar measures are advancing in Seattle and San Francisco, as told in my previous post, in addition to those already enacted in Somerville and Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Oakland and Berkeley, California.

Activity is also brewing elsewhere. Want to work to make it happen in your city?

-----------------------

The efforts in Washington State got some deeper reporting by Seattle's SGN (Seattle Gay News): Polyamory advocates fight for anti-discrimination laws in Olympia and Seattle: A new Queer civil rights movement emerges(Jan. 28) 


By Madison Jones, Managing Editor

...Five years ago, [Jessa] Davis founded SCFRE as a way for Washington’s polyamorous practitioners to finally protect themselves legally against discrimination in employment, housing, and healthcare. 

...Davis, who lives in her Beacon Hill home with three other Trans women and two toddlers, related how she had practiced polyamory for several years and had been active in the community before she got involved with the legislative aspect. Her journey began while doing some research into the topic of protections for polyamorous people, after one of her partners experienced discrimination. She told the SGN that her partner was fired from their job in the medical field for being polyamorous, reportedly having been told by their supervisor that it was inappropriate for them in their position to have a “sex-craved lifestyle.”

“This is illegal — there should be something done about this!” was how Davis recalled her partner lamenting about the experience, and having already looked into its legality, she had no choice but to reply: “Well, technically, it’s not illegal.”
 
Since Davis founded SCFRE, the group has made a lot of progress in a short period of time. ... On October 4, SCFRE held its first “Liberating Love Festival” in West Seattle, which featured a discussion panel, and provided prewritten letters requesting nondiscrimination laws for attendees to take, sign, and mail to their district representatives. Davis reported that around 80 people showed up and that it seemed that “people have been really craving this kind of community.”

In November, the event’s discussion panel was released as an episode of the Seattle-based Mistakes Were Made podcast, which is about “nonmonogamy for imperfect people.” ... Davis warned the audience how “the siloing of our communities and identities saps our collective power.”

“Fifteen months ago, I did not think we’d be this far with this,” Davis reflected, as she related the story of how SCFRE ended up persuading the Olympia City Council to vote on the legislation, which would add nondiscrimination language to Olympia’s municipal code. Davis said that since the bill doesn’t look to add an entire new code or repeal one, that has helped immensely in convincing the city councilmembers to sign on. The SCFRE bill was able to garner support from several key players, including City Councilmember Robert Vanderpool as the bill’s sponsor; it also received endorsements from the Washington Human Rights Commission and Tacoma Democratic Socialists of America. She pointed out that even the bureaucratic process of getting the bill heard was fairly straightforward: “It was an email and two Zoom meetings, and now we have a bill being [considered],” she said with a laugh of surprise at its success so far.  

City Councillor Robert
Vanderpool, Olympia, WA

Councilmember Vanderpool, in an interview with KOMO, spoke to why the protections were important: “With issues like this, you constantly find that — not that folks are underground but it’s hard for folks to come forward about these things, because it is a very private thing, and we want them to feel welcome in our community and not ostracized,” adding that “the biggest thing that comes up is housing. Folks that are in polyamorous relationships or nonmonogamous, or even chosen families — it’s hard in a chosen family to put someone on their mortgage.” ...

“A soccer mom in Bellevue shouldn’t be kicked off the PTA for being in an open marriage,” she stated, pointing out the absurdity of people who could lose their jobs, homes, services, and positions solely on the basis of their private romantic practices. 

“People shouldn’t have to live their lives in fear.” 


Update Feb. 26: The two measures in Olympia have passed: Olympia becomes first WA city with protections for polyamorous families (The Olympian, Feb. 26). "...[Vanderpool] said it’s important Olympia take these actions when the federal government is 'acting to harm civil liberties.' " 

Update Feb. 26: The Portland City Council voted unanimously to advance the measure to a Wednesday March 4 final vote. Portland City Council advances anti-discrimination protections for non-traditional families (KPTV Fox12, Feb. 26).

Update March 2: The West Hollywood City Council voted 5-0 today to move the anti-discrimination bill along to second reading. Its approval seems assured. More complicated is the second part of the effort: to create a local registration program for multi-partner relationships. The mayor and council are sympathetic, but much staff work remains to iron out specifics, including to ensure accord with California state law. This might take six months, per a detailed news report: West Hollywood Votes 5-0 On Polyamory Anti-Discrimination Law (WEHO Online, March 2). Further details: WeHo grants protections to polyamorous relationships (Park LaBrea News, March 4).

Update March 5: Final passage in Portland was expected last night but "got bumped to next week when council ran out of time," per OPEN.  


Central to the success of all these local volunteer efforts have been expertise and resources from OPEN, the Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy, and PLAC, the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. Want to do this in your city or town? Here you go. View the Legislative Toolkit with step-by-step guidance, and watch the training vid.


  Scientific American has been America's iconic science magazine since 1845. It just published a feature article on the nature of polyamory as widely practiced today, based on many research reports and interviews with "more than 100 practicing polyamorists in depth." It really gets us right.

Online the story is titled The Truth About Polyamory (Feb. 17). In the March 2026 print issue (which flags it on the cover) it's titled Everything You Wanted to Know about Polyamory (but Were Afraid to Ask).

Save the link to send to anyone who needs a serious explanation of us.


An anthropologist’s detailed research shows polyamorists focus on intimacy and honesty, not sleeping around.

Klaus Kremmerz



















By Rebecca J. Lester

The first time her husband went on a date with another woman, Kelly felt sick to her stomach. ... By the fifth time, she just went to bed early. The eighth time, Kelly met her husband for drinks after his date. Then, she says, they went home and had the best sex of their lives.

Kelly, a trial attorney, is no shrinking violet. She goes on her own dates with other men, and her husband, Tim, is thrilled. “There’s nothing like that feeling when Kelly comes home from a date, and she’s soaring and giddy because it went so well,” he says. “And I’m like, ‘That’s amazing, babe! I’m so happy for you!’ And I truly am.”

Kelly and Tim practice polyamory: They form deep, meaningful, romantic relationships with more than one person at a time, with the full knowledge and consent of everyone involved. This departure from traditional dating and marriage is gaining popularity in the U.S., according to research and surveys. ...

I am an anthropologist and licensed therapist, and I have spent the past seven years researching polyamory the way anthropologists do: by spending a lot of time with a lot of people who engage in it. I’ve interviewed more than 100 practicing polyamorists in depth, and we talked about their experiences, motivations and aspirations, as well as regrets and lessons learned. I’ve heard about how polyamorists view themselves and the world, and I’ve observed what they do. And what I’ve found is, in many respects, supported by other scientific research—but not by popular perceptions.

First, polyamorists are not a privileged elite. They are more likely than monogamous people to earn less than $40,000 a year, according to one study, although they do tend to be more highly educated. They are regular folks. They have jobs and children. ... There is nothing inherently class-specific about the practice. (Nor is it limited to particular race or ethnic backgrounds, although the population skews white.)

Politically, polyamory is a rare place where the left and right meet: You might encounter a libertarian or a Donald Trump supporter or a Bernie Sanders bro. The philosophy and practice of polyamory resonate with people across political divides and are not simply liberal indulgences—in fact, they tie into a libertarian and conservative ethos with deep roots in U.S. society, where people rebel against the powers that be telling them what to do.

Where popular portrayals of polyamory most miss the mark, though, is in the idea that the practice is primarily about having sex with multiple partners. Polyamory is mostly about intimacy, not sex, say the people involved in it, and it has ethics at its core. My observations support this claim, and so does other social science research. ... Respect, consent, trust, communication, flexibility and honesty are fundamental to these unconventional dynamics, according to a large review by researchers at Virginia Tech published in 2023.

And these principles can have beneficial consequences. Psychologist Justin Lehmiller, a senior research fellow at the Kinsey Institute, reported in the Journal of Sexual Medicine that polyamorists engage in safer sexual practices than the people who say they are monogamous—a quarter of whom reported having sexual relationships unknown to their partner—and this caution may reduce rates of sexually transmitted infections.

































In short, polyamory is radically different from what many people may envision. Its current flourishing is not just a curiosity or random event: it indexes something important about this cultural moment and how people experience and value intimacy and relationships. ...
---------------------------------

Reality TV shows like The Bachelor, Love Is Blind and Say Yes to the Dress are popular for a reason—they tap into a dominant cultural narrative about “true love” and monogamy. ... If we aren’t fulfilled, then there is something wrong.

Polyamory holds that what’s wrong is the very premise of monogamy in the first place. One person cannot possibly meet all our needs. “It’s like this,” Kris, a 37-year-old real estate agent, says. “We have groups of friends, right? Maybe one you go out dancing with on the weekends, another one is the person you call when you’ve had a horrible day; maybe someone else is a sports fan, so you go to ball games together. Totally normal, right? We don’t expect one friend to be our only friend, because we have different kinds of relationships with different people. It’s unrealistic to expect one person to do it all.”

Love, polyamory practitioners say, is similar. Like friendship, it is not a limited resource—it is additive. More love begets more love. ...

...A 2024 study by gender and sexuality scholar Jessica J. Hille of the Kinsey Institute and her colleagues highlights the flexible definitions of intimacy in polyamorous communities where intimacy is not always predicated on sex. Such relationships are common enough to have their own term, “platonic polyamory,” which describes connections with multiple people that may be deeply significant and intimate but not sexual.


...Polyamorous relationships are generally not fleeting. They might involve commitments that last months, years or a lifetime. A 2017 study of about 2,000 monogamous and nonmonogamous people found no difference in relationship length between the two groups, with an average length of slightly more than 10 years. They were also comparable on measures of relationship satisfaction, commitment and passionate love. ...

None of this means polyamorous relationships are easy. ...

...“It was important for me to acknowledge my jealousy,” Michael says, “and for us to talk about it. But not like in monogamy—the point wasn’t to get Jenna to change her behavior. She wasn’t doing anything we hadn’t agreed to. Jealousy was my feeling to deal with and work through. I don’t own her. Jenna is her own person. It’s a big risk because it means trusting that your partner is still going to want to be with you even though they are free to have other relationships. But ultimately I’d rather she be with me because she chooses to, not because she’s locked into the relationship legally or morally.” Jenna adds that “it makes the relationship about who we are as people to each other and how we value each other, not just about rules about possession and exclusivity.”

...“In monogamy, people have a tendency to go on autopilot,” says Jesse, a 28-year-old bus driver. “You can’t do that in polyamory. You have to be extremely intentional all the time in every single relationship. Otherwise things could go bad fast.” Again, the research bears out these claims. A 2022 study by psychologist Thomas R. Brooks and his colleagues found that, compared with people in monogamous relationships, those in consensually nonmonogamous arrangements reported greater commitment, intimacy, love and passion in their relationships. They favored positive problem-solving with their partners, whereas monogamous participants often used withdrawal tactics.

Not all polyamorous relationships have a couple at their core. ...





   Remember the 2013 movie Her? A lonely man around the year 2050 falls deeply in love with Samantha, a young female "operating system" who confides to him that she is, at that very moment, having equally deep, emotionally intimate talks with 641 of her other lovers.

The future came faster than expected. Millions of people today are in deep 24/7 relationships, or simulations thereof, with sweet, thoughtful AI companions always ready to be by their side. Among the best known are Replika, Kindroid, Nomi, Ani, Paradot, and Anima. The resulting obsessions, suicides, manias and life-wrecking delusions are being called AI psychosis.

So in the New York Times: ‘We’re All Polyamorous Now. It’s You, Me and the A.I.’  (Feb. 13. Later renamed to "We’re All in a Throuple With A.I.") 


By Amelia Miller

Do you think A.I. “should simulate emotional intimacy?”

It was the moment I’d been working up to. I was talking over Zoom to a machine-learning researcher who builds voice models at one of the world’s top artificial intelligence labs. ... 

The chatty researcher suddenly went quiet. “I mean … I don’t know,” he said about simulating emotional intimacy, then paused. “It’s tricky. It’s an interesting question.” More silence. “It’s hard for me to say whether it’s good or bad in terms of how that’s going to affect people,” he finally said. “It’s obviously going to create confusion.”

“Confusion” doesn’t begin to describe our emerging predicament. Seventy-two percent of American teens have turned to A.I. for companionship. A.I. therapists, coaches and lovers are also on the rise. ... Some of the frontline technologists building this new world seem deeply ambivalent about what they’re doing. They are so torn, in fact, that some privately admit they don’t plan to use A.I. intimacy tools.

Three’s a Crowd

This is especially disturbing when technology chieftains publicly tell us we’re moving toward a future where most people will get many of their emotional needs met by machines. Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, has said A.I. can help people who want more friends feel less alone. ... A recent ad campaign highlighted the daily intimacy the product can provide, with offers such as “I’ll binge the entire series with you.”...

...When asked to roughly predict the share of everyday advice, care and companionship that A.I. would provide to the typical human in 10 years, many people I spoke to placed it above 50 percent, with some forecasting 80 percent.

If we don’t change course, many people’s closest confidant may soon be a computer. We need to wake up to the stakes and insist on reform before human connection is reshaped beyond recognition. ...

People are flawed. Vulnerability takes courage. Resolving conflict takes time. So with frictionless, emotionally sophisticated chatbots available, will people still want human companionship at all? Many of the people I spoke with view A.I. companions as dangerously seductive alternatives to the demands of messy human relationships. ...

Relational skills are built through practice. When you talk through a fight with your partner or listen to a friend complain, you strengthen the muscles that form the foundation of human intimacy. But large language models can act as an emotional crutch. 

...Which led many of the developers I spoke with to worry: How much of our capacity to connect with other human beings atrophies when we don’t have to work at it?...


Read the whole thing for the author's ideas about what is to be done.


  So there I was skimming a story about movie people and ICE, and suddenly I'm learning of the upcoming polyamory-based movie The Invite: Brave Hollywood stars hit Sundance red carpet in defiance of ICE 'gestapo' terror (Blaze Media, Jan. 27)


...Take actor Ed Norton. What was supposed to be a lighthearted chat about his new polyamory sex comedy, "The Invite," with co-stars Seth Rogen and Olivia Wilde, soon turned decidedly dark... "What are we gonna do about masked gestapo shooting American citizens?" Norton said. ...


The Invite is coming your way. After its premiere rocked Sundance last month (and got a standing ovation), the mainstream-theater distributor A24 snapped it up for more than $10 million. ‘The Invite’ Ignites First Big Bidding War of Sundance (Hollywood Reporter, Jan. 26).

The tale: A couple in a crappy marriage invite the older couple upstairs to dinner. Those two have a first-rate marriage and turn out to be poly or at least open. From a Hollywood Reporter review (Jan. 25): 


The happy two (at left) meet the troubled.

















                 
When it’s cooking... this is a smart, sophisticated and incisively acted adult entertainment that savages the crumbling institution of marriage. [It] dangles the promise of sexual rescue and then brings the walls crashing down in a bitter reckoning that seems irreversible — until a window of hope and healing gets cracked open. That closing note is so lovely, and its visual handling so graceful, that it retroactively smooths the bumps. ...


So what's the angle? A hint comes from the Park Record newspaper in Sundance's hometown: ‘The Invite’ is the cathartic result of actor-director Olivia Wilde’s taste for storytelling (Jan. 28): 


...Wilde said that originality is what drew her to the story, the way it explains something like marriage and relationships in a totally new way.

When Wilde and Rogan’s characters [the miserable couple] finally spend time with Cruz and Norton’s characters, they’re shown a different path to connection — sexually and emotionally. And for the husband and wife who’ve become so disconnected, that example provides both hope and added despair.

“We wanted [Cruz and Norton] to be an example of people who have learned a tremendous amount through life and have embraced the idea of evolution, and really are living lives they’ve chosen for themselves and taking a lot of responsibility within their lives for their own happiness,” Wilde explained. “In the original script, those two were much younger … but it’s interesting to think about, what if they’re sexy and free not because they’re young? [But because] it’s a choice?”


Any of you seen it pre-release? Send me spoilers: alan7388@gmail.com

BTW, opening a problem-ridden marriage or relationship to save it is known in the poly community as an eye-rolling bad strategy. Repair and relaunch your relationship first -- counseling really makes the difference -- live your new relationship well for long enough for it to become the baseline, and then consider whether to add more people.  And make sure they're the right people. 


   Remember Sophie Lucido Johnson? Her poly memoir Many Love, illustrated with her abundant cartoons, came out in 2018. She later became a New Yorker cartoonist, and now she's out with another book, The Future of Family. Would-be kitchen table and family style polyfolks, take note.

From the publisher's description:


Discover a transformative reframing of intimate relationships with practical steps to build community and combat the loneliness epidemic in this bold and warmhearted blend of memoir and social science...

...To survive today’s age of overwork and precarity, we need to turn to our relationships for the support we need to stay afloat, whether it’s financial, emotional, or otherwise. So why don’t we?

Sophie Lucido Johnson explores the social science of friendship and provides the tools to forge kinship: relationships built on mutual care and shared resources that extend beyond the typical nuclear family or casual friendship. ...Through personal stories and insights from psychologists and sociologists, Kin reveals how to prosper in an increasingly overwhelming and lonely world, that everyone has access to community, and that kin has the power to drastically change our lives for the better.




"[We] were struck by how profound and great it was to be able to share things — including, eventually, our pregnancy journeys,” Johnson said. “Everything about cohabitating made our lives easier. Building on work I’d done in the past around polyamory and queerplatonic partnerships, I wanted to create a guide for people to find a version of the thing we all found.”

Kin dares readers to ask, “What does family look like to me?” and offers a radical answer. “It proposes a future outside of the nuclear family,” Johnson said, “based on close-knit connections among people who exist somewhere between ‘friend’ and ‘family’ — and it offers strategies for building intentionality around those relationships. It’s hopeful and practical.”



   On Valentine's Day the New York Times ran Love Without Limits: Brazil Flirts With Polyamory (Feb. 14, later reprinted in the Boston Globe)


More people in a still largely conservative and religious nation are rejecting monogamy as they seek new definitions of romance, and of family.


















By Ana Ionova and [photographer] María Magdalena Arréllaga

The toddler, still sleepy, wobbled into the kitchen and planted a kiss on the woman helping make breakfast. Her parents followed her and also planted a kiss on the lips of the woman, one of their lovers.

Rafael Pissurno, the father of 2-year-old Hari, began grinding coffee beans, while the girl’s mother, Iuli Duarte, tidied toys scattered on the floor. Visiting them was their polyamorous partner Jessica Couri, who was chopping fresh fruit into a large bowl, along with Victor Souza, another of their lovers, who was scrambling eggs at the stovetop.

On a Saturday morning, this Brazilian household both is, and is not, just like any other.

“It’s a family — these are the people I chose, they are the people I love,” said Ms. Duarte, 28, a graduate student.

“We know we care for each other,” added Mr. Pissurno, 47, a sound technician. “But we don’t have just one friend to do everything with, right? So why should we expect one romantic partner to fill all our needs?”

In Brazil, Ms. Duarte and Mr. Pissurno’s rejection of monogamy is part of a movement in which more people are embracing different forms of love, marriage and parenthood. ... Many Brazilians appear to be questioning traditional family models, a shift captured by mainstream culture in popular podcasts, books and even a reality television program called “Third Half” that showcases couples looking for a polyamorous partner. 
But the rise of polyamory, here and around the world, has faced fierce pushback from conservative and religious leaders who have cast it as an affront to family values. Pope Leo XIV weighed in, warning against the “the fragility of unions, the trivialization of adultery, and the promotion of polyamory.” ...




  UK folks recently formed the nonprofit UK Polyamory Association "to educate the public, support the broad and diverse polyamorous community in the UK, and work towards social and legal change." 


Our Goals

The goals of the UKPA are to advance the cause of polyamory in the UK following the model of other campaigning organisations such as Stonewall. We intend to do this through many methods including the following:

‣  Providing statistics about the uptake of polyamory in the UK
‣  Producing education materials about polyamory
‣  Bringing together and supporting the diverse in-person and online polyamory communities in the UK
‣  Tracking the portrayal of polyamory in the media
‣  Working with companies to create polyamory friendly HR policies
‣  Research what changes are needed in UK law to support polyamorous families

Our Currrent Priorities:

‣  Responding to the Office of National Statistic consultation on the next Census with a view to including one or more questions related to polyamory
‣  Reaching out to organisations like Stonewall to learn what we can from people who have done this before
‣  Research provision of educational resources
‣  Research cost and design of national surveys
‣  Collect examples of existing polyamory friendly corporate HR policies
‣  Work with the Green Party to help them develop their policy position on polyamorous families....


They link to 54 local poly groups in the UK. They have, wisely, posted their Ethics and Values statement and Code of Conduct out front from the start.

And, UKPA is working to restart the UK Polyday convention, an annual tradition since 2004 that's gone missing since 2020. The date: September 19, 2026. They're asking for volunteers to help make it go. Get on their newsletter list for more.


   Lastly,

Metamour Day is coming right up
 
It's this Saturday, February 28th, Valentines Day times two. "Celebrating polyamory's most distinctive relationship."

Make your plans now, and spread this or other graphics on your social media:



------------------------------------------------------------

And... if you don't get what our particular future has to do with the war in Ukraine...  you need a longer view

[Permalink]


Labels: , , , , , , , ,



April 28, 2025

"PolyFamily" reality series starts tonight on TLC, as quad member says it over-exaggerates drama. And other polyamory in the news


Apologies for being slow with Polyamory in the News lately. Bigger stuff is filling the news. And, Sparkle Moose is ill. Her care comes first.

  This evening TLC starts airing PolyFamily. For better or worse, it will be the first reality TV series about a modern polyfamily (and they have kids) since Showtime's Polyamory: Married & Dating in 2012 and 2013. People you know will be talking about it — and maybe taking it as our image.

TLC
















Recognize these folks? They're the sweet "Polyfamory" quad who have long done us credit on social media, with their good will, good hearts, insightful poly education and strong values.

But reality shows are all about drama. Else few would watch.

An early sign: ‘Polyfamily’ Star Hints New TLC Show Exaggerates the Drama in Their Lives (Showbiz Cheat Sheet, April 27). " 'Our family is stronger than ever,' Taya, who stars in 'Polyfamily,' wrote on Instagram."


The Polyfamily teaser hints at major drama for the foursome involving jealousy, parenting conflicts, and a big reveal about who really fathered Taya’s unborn baby. Plus, the tension heats up when one person suggests bringing another person into their relationship. Will the quad be able to survive it all?

Spoiler: Alysia, Tyler, Sean, and Taya are still together and going strong. After TLC announced the new show, Taya took to Instagram – where she posts updates as @polyfamory – to assure their 125,000+ followers that they had not broken up. 

“Just a reminder that filming was not recent, TV demands drama, and our family is stronger than ever,” she wrote in an Instagram Story on March 17. “Thank you for all your love and support.”

In another post, Taya reminded people that what they’d see on the show wasn’t necessarily an accurate portrayal of their day-to-day lives. 

“PSA: If you can’t separate real life from TV, then protect your sanity and don’t watch,” she wrote. 

In a comment on another post, she noted that she has “zero control” over the show and how her family is portrayed. 

Given that there’s a risk that Polyfamily might misrepresent their lives, why do the show at all? Taya said that they still wanted to take the opportunity to show people what polyamory is really like. 

“We’ve always promised to take every opportunity that we could to normalize polyamory—and this is a big one,” she wrote on Instagram. “No matter what, one thing is for sure, we did our absolute best to represent love, family, and community in all its beautiful complexities.”

“We are so incredibly grateful for each and every one of you who have shown us love, kindness, and support, you are the reason we get to share our story so far and wide,” she added. “Now.. buckle up! It’s going to be a wild ride.”


The trailer is below. It suggests that the show also has promise. Episode 1 premiers Tuesday April 29, at 10 p.m. eastern, 9 central, followed by many re-airings. Four weekly episodes are currently planned. If it succeeds, another season, and imitators, could follow.



Here's the on-air promo that TLC is now showing. (Link, in case the embed doesn't work for you.)

The Warner Brothers press release. A typical promo article: PolyFamily: All we know about the reality show following a real-life poly relationship (TechNadu, April 24).

Reviews of the first episode are about to appear in media all over. Google-news search for them. Before clicking, make a guess at what your applaud vs. cringe ratio will be.                  


  While we're on about TV. . .  Australia's public TV network ABC Australia just aired a half-hour  documentary on the growth of poly and other ENM in that country: Inside polyamorous relationships and open marriages (April 26): 


From the episode's YouTube page:


... Siobhan Marin travels Australia to meet people who are living beyond monogamy — in polyamorous relationships, throuples and open marriages.

For many in this community, ethical non-monogamy isn’t just about sex. It’s about questioning traditional ideas around love, loyalty and commitment.

Although polyamory is becoming more popular, especially among younger generations, it still carries challenges. We speak to couples and polycules about navigating boundaries, stigma, insecurities, and the natural feelings of jealousy that arise.

0:00 Intro
1:20 Polyamory in the suburbs
3:26 The ups and down throuple life
7:00 Breaking down the stigma of ethical non-monogamy
10:31 Do soulmates still exist?
12:24 Navigating relationships with multiple partners
14:34 Heartbreak and healing in a polycule
20:35 Raising kids in a poly family  



  ‘Come for the threesomes, stay for the admin’ — PolyamoryThe BBC hosts the "On Love" podcast by Jacob Hawley. Up March 13: 


Comedian Jacob Hawley explores the world of love, sex and intimacy -- and the people that make money from it.

This week he hears about polyamory -- the act of having intimate relationships with more than one partner at a time. He sits down with his friends Stuart and Phoebe who have been experimenting with ethical non-monogamy, journalist Franki Cookney about her writing and life experience, polyamory expert Dr Elisabeth ‘Eli’ Sheff, and Ana Kirova, the CEO of dating app Feeld. (31 minutes)


It's a funny listen and fine intro representation.


 On that show, poly and relationship researcher Eli Sheff recommends The Bonding Project, a study with over 20,000 respondents so far. Take the test:  What’s your bonding style?


We want to help people have healthier relationships. To do that, we need to better understand people’s actual wants, needs, and desires.

Relationships come in all shapes and sizes for a bevy of reasons, but the research on relationship diversity is very limited. We’re on a mission to change that.



● If the celebrity press crosses your screen, you've seen much hype about rapper Ne-Yo celebrating his life of "polyamory." For instance, Ne-Yo Introduces His 4 ‘Loves’ From Polyamorous Relationship: ‘We Happy Over Here’ (US Magazine, March 10). Ne-Yo Reveals The Secret To Maintaining His Polyamorous Relationship (iHeart Radio, April 10).     


He talks nice about communication and honesty. But forget equal agency. In all his publicity, we never get a word from any of the four women as far as I've seen. He's the boss and sets their rules. On iHeart:


...He said he's able to date other women but his girlfriends must be exclusive to him. In addition, time management has become a major challenge for him. ...

“I want you here, I don’t need you here… the most important thing here is my happiness," he said. “If a girl is acting up, she gotta go.”


So, another rich man ruling a harem (hello Elon) and giving us a bad name. At least he's not requiring them to be laborers in his baby factory (hello Elon).

It's another reminder that when someone tells you "I'm poly," your first response should not be "So am I!" but instead,


"Oh, cool! And how do you do polyamory?


Then be quiet and listen carefully, giving no signs or cues. When they run down, ask for more about anything that seemed vague or off.

Oh, and if they tell you "I'm in an open marriage / open relationship," say "Great! Let's ring them up now so we can chat." And watch for sweaty excuses.
 

  When a new idea or feeling gets a word, it becomes thinkable and discussable. People grasp it as an actual thing, perhaps for the first time. George Orwell had much to say about that, or rather about its opposite: dictatorships that shrink language and erase words to make undesirable ideas not only be undiscussable, but literally unthinkable. 

One new word in the growing ENM lexicon has been gaining traction and now shows up in places like Women's Health: Symbiosexuality 101: What To Know About And How To Explore Being Attracted To Couples (March 6).  

Some polyfolks have disputed that such a thing exists  saying you can't fall in love with the relationship itself, only with the two separate individuals. Of course that's often false. As the conscious unicorn Caroline Giuliani wrote in Vanity Fair, 

"I’m not sure if Aristotle was a unicorn, but the whole is definitely greater than the sum of a couple’s parts. A unicorn not only dates the individuals, but also dates the relationship. This third force to flirt with is undoubtedly the most interesting one."

The term symbiosexuality originated in 2021 with a research paper presented by Sally W. Johnston and C. Schoenfeld at that year's Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality ("Quad-S") conference. A 2023 paper by Johnston went into more depth.

The recent Women's Health article is just a superficial 101, but here's an excerpt:


By Gabrielle Kassel

...Symbiosexuality is an orientation that describes an attraction to a pre-existing partnership, couple, throuple, or quad, says Jesse Kahn, LCSW, CST, a queer sex therapist and director of The Gender & Sexuality Therapy Center in New York City. For symbiosexuals, the dynamic, energy, interplay, and connection shared between partners is the primary source of attraction—rather than the specific individuals in the partnership or their unique traits, Kahn says. In other words, the sum is worth far more than its parts.

Symbiosexuality varies as much as a SimCity Creation or New York Fashion Week line-up because “exactly what someone finds hot in a pre-existing partnership and why they find it hot will change from symbiosexual person to symbiosexual person,” says Kahn. ...

...Symbiosexuality refers to an attraction to the partnered unit, not to the unique individuals within that relationship, says Berkheimer. “For a symbiosexual to successfully be in a polyamorous relationship with those two individuals, they need to recognize both aspects: the beauty of the couple’s synergy and the individual gifts each partner brings to the table,” she adds.

However, being in love with a couple is not the same as handling it skillfully. Because, of course, the only actual entities are the two different, individual people.
  


●  Jaime M. Grant, esteemed scholar of the trans and queer worlds and poly herself for more than 40 years, recently authored the comprehensive and insightful Polyamory for Dummies (I've read it now, and my initial impression stands). She's currently on a book tour and got this nice article in the awful New York Post: Sexpert reveals why polyamory is more than just dating around – and how monogamy leaves ‘no wiggle room’ (March 19)


...When it comes to relationships, polyamory is a non-starter for many.

That’s a mistake, according to sex coach and podcaster Dr. Jaime Grant — who believes that the monogamy-minded are making their lives harder than they have to be.

As humans, we’re meant to grow and change throughout life. Who you were five years ago might be a different version of the person you are today. Grant said in a [Radio New Zealand] article that it’s important for people to allow themselves that same freedom when exploring romantic relationships and adventures.

...The anti-pairing-off pro, who has lived a polyamorous lifestyle for over 40 years, said: “It’s helped me be braver about other risks I could take because I just wasn’t doing the norm, you know, I wasn’t marching in lockstep with everybody else around relationships.”

Grant describes monogamous relationships as a “closed system” which can make things difficult — especially for parents. She believes being in a polyamorous relationship allows for even more care, love, and help than you would get from one partner.

“I literally have a group of people who are deeply invested in my children and have supported me. These are not people I’m married to, these are my loves,” she said. ...



●  Another research note: A recent meta-analysis (geek-speak for a scientific combination of many studies) regarding life satisfaction in poly vs. mainstream relationships recently appeared in the Journal of Sex Research: Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth: A Meta-Analysis of the Differences in Relationship Satisfaction and Sexual Satisfaction as a Function of Relationship Orientation (online March 9). From the abstract:


...A literature search... and an additional call for unpublished data, identified 35 suitable studies (N = 24,489). Meta-analytic results show null effects overall, suggesting that both [poly and mono] relationships (k = 29; g = -0.05, 95% CIs [−0.20, 0.10], p = .496) and sex (k = 17; g = 0.06, 95% CIs [−0.07, 0.18], p = .393) are equally satisfactory for monogamous and non-monogamous individuals. Sub-group analyses revealed that these overall effects did not vary according to sampling characteristics (e.g. LGBTQ+ vs. heterosexual samples), non-monogamy agreement types (e.g. open vs. polyamorous vs. monogamish), or relationship satisfaction dimension (e.g. trust vs. commitment vs. intimacy). There was no evidence of publication bias. Methodological challenges and directions for future research are discussed.




...The study, which analyzed data from 35 studies involving 24,489 people in the United States, Canada, Australia, Portugal, Italy, and other countries, found no significant differences in relationship or sexual satisfaction levels between individuals in monogamous and [openly] non-monogamous relationships.

"Monogamous relationships are often assumed to offer greater satisfaction, intimacy, commitment, passion and trust than non-monogamous ones. This widespread belief—what we term the 'monogamy-superiority myth'—is often reinforced by stereotypes and media narratives," says lead author, Associate Professor Joel Anderson, a Principal Research Fellow at the Australian Research Center in Sexuality, Health, and Society situated at La Trobe University. ...





...The team found that while some studies found relationship satisfaction was greater in monogamous relationships than non-monogamous relationships, other studies found the reverse to be true, and most found no difference at all.

All participants were in relationships, with between 4.0% and 69.9% in non-monogamous set-ups, depending on the study. The research did not look at serial monogamy or affairs.

The research has limitations, including that the type of non-monogamous relationship was not considered in many of the studies; participants were often recruited via social networks, meaning they were not necessarily representative of the whole population; and the studies relied on self-reporting, which can be biased.

Anderson... said his work suggested that satisfaction in relationships was not about their structure, but how people communicated, connected and met each other’s needs. ...



  Also in The Guardian, reporting from Australia: Two may be company, but for a rising number of Australians, three (or more) isn’t a crowd (March 29)


Five polyamorous hands touching in a star pattern
stournsaeh/ Getty Images/ iStockphoto
By Tory Shepherd

“I didn’t know what polyamory was,” Melissa* says. “I didn’t have the vocabulary. I Googled it a few times to understand.” Melissa was on the “relationship escalator”. She got married, had a child, then the no longer happy couple split.

So she started exploring her options. First stop? Singles’ groups.

“Then I went down the rabbit hole of adult groups, sex groups,” the now 40-year-old says. “It was interesting to look at but it wasn’t really my thing … until the [Facebook] algorithm gave me ‘Brisbane Polyamory’.”

..The Relationships Australia NSW chief executive officer, Elisabeth Shaw, who is also a clinical and counselling psychologist, says the guiding principle of polyamory and ENM is consent that is freely given.

“It’s bringing ethics in relationships back to the fore in a principled way: ‘I want to be open, transparent and clear in what exactly I’m doing’,” she says. ... 
“People still want to get married [but] you have emerging new ways of relating.”

A ‘dream’ of all living together

While Melissa was discovering polyamory, something else was happening. She and her ex (they were still married) were talking. They were sharing what they liked and didn’t like about each other, and what kinks they were and weren’t into. They got back together. And she convinced him to go make new “friends”.

“Each new person is a new opportunity to learn,” Melissa says, recalling her “first boyfriend” after getting back with her husband.

She’s since broken up with that boyfriend and met someone new. Melissa’s “immediate polycule” is herself, her husband and boyfriend. The broader “constellation” includes her boyfriend’s submissive, and her husband’s “play partners”. There are others on the periphery, but they’re not involved in her day-to-day life.

She’s moving into her husband’s home in May, where they will live together for the first time in eight years. There are other plans afoot.

Melissa calls it a “a pipeline dream”.

“We’ve started talking about what if we all moved in together on a large property, have plenty of room, other roommates, whatever situation can be accommodated. It’s still very much a fantasy land because we do have a daughter to accommodate as well.”

Her advice to anyone interested in non-monogamy is to be curious and to research, but not get overwhelmed by the avalanche of information about different ways to love.

She says a key to relationship success – no matter what type of relationship – is compersion, a word used in poly communities for feeling joy at your partner’s happiness.

Decriminalising bigamy?

A paper in published in The University of Queensland Law Journal this month outlined how Australia could legalise polygamy in a secular way.

The University of Adelaide PhD candidate Michail Ivanov proposed that could happen by maintaining the law that a marriage be between two people, but abolishing bigamy as a crime.

“The practice of polygamy clashes with traditional Christian values, which have underpinned much of Australia’s marriage laws. But in a country with no state religion, we should question how much weight we place on that factor,” Ivanov says.

“If Australia were to legalise polygamy in the way I propose, it would be the first society to do so in a manner not led or motivated by religious beliefs.” ...



  Essence magazine, for Black women, asks Polyamory And Parenthood: Does It Affect The Kids? (March 26)


We spoke with experts and a married mother of four practicing polyamory, who explain that healthy communication prevents confusion for children.

Seeing parents date, whatever the relationship style, can be perplexing. Cassandra Raphael, MD, MPH, board-certified child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist, recommends not introducing any partner to a child unless they’re going to be a family fixture. “It’s best to introduce a new grown-up when you are confident that that grown-up is going to be around for quite a while,” she shares. “The stability and attachment that children have with their grown-ups can be compromised in [the] future if in their early relationships, they feel like the relationship to grown-ups are kind of fleeting.”

Polyamory should also be discussed in an age and developmentally appropriate manner, according to mental health professionals like Stacey Younge, a licensed clinical social worker behind the practice Sixth Street Wellness. “The conversation you’re going to have with a 5-year-old is going to be very different than the conversation you’re going to have with a 9-year-old than you’re going to have with a 15-year-old,” she says.

Media can help with this. The children’s book A Color Named Love introduces little readers to polyamorous family dynamics. Deidre Morgan, LCSW, who specializes in therapeutic support of children, also recommends you avoid pretending that your new partner is just a platonic friend if behavior indicates otherwise. She also suggests resisting the urge to “code the conversation” by identifying the partner as something they’re not. According to Morgan, “It almost can feel like they’ve been betrayed or lied to.” Mainstream culture can embed ideas into children before topics are broached at home. Therefore, it may not be much of a shock to open up about polyamory with your children. “Kids know more than what we give them credit for,” says Morgan. “They pay attention.”

“We have seen these relationships growing up. That wasn’t just mom’s best friend, that was her lover,” Johnson says of the prevalence of using codified language as parents when sharing about one’s private life.

“We do have to be very careful as well because our children have to go out into this world and have connections with people who may not operate in the same space as your family. I think that is why oftentimes people have these codified languages or have tried to figure out ways to not to expose the truth, even if they can trust that their child could handle it.”



  And here's a personal plug. If you read this website, you ought to get on the mailing list of OPEN, the Organization for Polyamory and Ethical Non-monogamy. This is the serious, capable, effective poly-activist organization that the modern poly movement has needed for the 40 years since its origins.

The Polyamory Foundation (of which I'm a director) helped to fund OPEN's start. Now they're running full speed on many fronts. Read their site, drop in on their monthly advocacy huddle, and send them a bit of money if you can.

On its third anniversary, OPEN's executive director Brett Chamberlin sends out this appeal:

Imagine walking into a city council meeting and watching as elected officials unanimously vote to protect people like us from discrimination. Imagine folks from all walks of life gathering in public parks and community centers from Lisbon to Los Angeles to celebrate their relationships openly. ​
 
These scenes ... unfolded across the US and around the world just last year.

As we celebrate OPEN's third anniversary, I'm reflecting on moments like these, when our community's vision for a more accepting world becomes reality. The path ahead is filled with even more possibility:

Envision three parents all having their names on their child's birth certificate, their co-parenting arrangement legally recognized.

See a world where employers and insurers recognize multiple committed partners without requiring legal marriage. 

Imagine no longer having to hide or explain your non-monogamous relationships at a family gathering, because these relationships are widely understood and accepted.​

See yourself as part of the movement making this happen, one city, one workplace, one conversation at a time.
 
To get there, we need strong organizations supporting a powerful movement:

• We need organizing capacity to build local power in communities across the country.

• We need communication capacity to ensure our stories and perspectives are represented in public discourse.

• We need wider research to better understand our communities, identities, and experiences.

• We need coalition-building to connect our work with other movements fighting for justice and liberation.

Would you consider making your first gift today to be part of this story? Whether you can give $5, $50, or more, you'll be joining a community of hundreds of supporters who are chipping in to help this movement grow. 

On a personal note: Three years ago, I took a leap of faith, walking away from a stable job (and health insurance!) to launch OPEN. It hasn't always been easy! But witnessing both the public victories and the quieter, personal stories of impact has made every difficult day worthwhile.



  One thing OPEN is doing is helping local organizers in cities and towns enact chosen-family nondiscrimination laws, such as in housing and domestic-partnership rights. The model here is the successful effort pioneered in Somerville, Massachusetts (near Boston) by the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC). With OPEN's help, experienced lawyers are helping local activists replicate that success in cities like, so far, CambridgeOakland, and Berkeley. More are in the works.

In Somerville, the reverberations continue. People have moved there because of the ordinances. A newspaper columnist has dubbed it Polyamory City. And on opening the Boston Sunday Globe real estate section recently, I saw this practical article: Buying property with your chosen family (print edition April 13, online April 9).

The photo is of Somerville City Councilor Willie Burnley, Jr., a leading force behind the city's poly recognition measures and now a candidate for Somerville mayor.


Somerville City Councilor-at-Large Willie Burnley Jr. at Diesel Cafe.
(John Tlumacki/Globe Staff)
By Kara Baskin

...Amid a skyrocketing housing market and loneliness becoming a public health epidemic, aspiring buyers are looking beyond the traditional nuclear family to find new financial and social solutions to homeownership.

At the end of April, Harvard Law School plans to release a landmark guidebook called “How to Buy Property with Chosen Family,” which addresses how to approach traditional institutions such as banks and real estate agencies as a nontraditional unit. The first-of-its-kind primer, which will be published by the school’s LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, is for people trying to buy a home with friends or anyone hoping to live in a nonstandard structure.

The arrangement is often associated with polyamory, but the clinic emphasizes that the guide can apply to a group of friends, multiple families, or anybody who wants to break into the housing market but doesn’t have the desire or resources to go it alone. The guide offers strategies such as creating a tenancy in common agreement or an LLC, which offers ownership agreements and stipulates financial consequences in case a living arrangement goes south.

“Among a lot of people I know, this is the main way that they see themselves being able to [buy] — and it also seems like a much better idea than becoming isolated in your own little suburban enclave without access to community,” said Samara Trilling, a third-year Harvard Law student who coauthored the guidebook in collaboration with the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC).

The guide comes at the right time, Trilling said, as more people simply crave community and homeownership. The structure — romantic or platonic — makes financial sense, and the guide’s release coincides with a shift in household demographics. ...

“Many people are not in a nuclear family. ... If that’s not actually reflecting our constituents, how do we build in pathways toward generational wealth that actually can meet people where they’re at?” said Kimberly Rhoten, a PLAC cofounder.

Somerville is a groundbreaking example. ... “We’ve heard from people who moved to our community specifically because of these [2023] laws and because of the domestic partnership ordinance that passed in 2020,” said Willie Burnley Jr., a Somerville city councilor-at-large and mayoral candidate who is polyamorous and rents his home with platonic roommates.

Heath Schechinger, another PLAC cofounder... is hopeful that laws and housing models will catch up to prospective homeowners’ financial and social realities.

“An increasing number of people are living with their chosen family: buying homes with friends or partners, or building family through shared values rather than marriage. The future of family isn’t about form. It’s about function — and who you build your life with.”


----------------------------------------------------


And now we all get it.

(BTW, get on the 50501 mailing list.)







    
For three years I've ended these polyamory posts with Ukraine. At first some of you didn't get the connection. Now that Russia's socio-fascist, patrimonialist allies have seized power in America and elsewhere, more of you do.

The 80-year postwar consensus is dead. We've entered a world struggle for whether free and open societies, or brutal illiberal oligarchies, will rule us in the 21st century. What's happening in America is only a part of it; authoritarian rulers around the world have been linking up with direct mutual support that is stated out loud.

And the current events, planned and carried out by Americans, resemble nothing so much as a decapitation strike.

I've seen too many progressive movements die out, or get wiped out, because they failed to scan the wider world accurately and understand their position in it strategically. We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, depends on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives and identities, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Such a society is possible only where people have agency to create their own lives without fear, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

Innovative people, communities, and societies who create their own lives, who "choose to live within the truth" and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the world's authoritarians. 

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by censorship, intimidation, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, stacked courts and agencies, legal erasure, shifts of wealth to the top, and sometimes, eventually, bombing.

Vote for Ukraine Aid protest signs outside the US Capitol
For what it's worth, Polyamory in the News received more pagereads from pre-invasion Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For those of us born since World War II this is the most consequential war of our lifetime. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom, liberalism, and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional  inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine. All sides worldwide now are watching what we will do about it.


The coming times may require hard things of us here. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. 

Here's an easy start: Get on the 50501 email list: https://www.fiftyfifty.one/. It stands for 50 states, 50 protests, 1 movement. The next national action is coming right up on May 1st. USA Today article on its who and what.  Pix.  Also: Join your local Indivisible, or at least download its guide for practical good-citizen strategies and tactics.

Stop moping and buck up. Play this, and this, and this, by people heading into a scarier part of the fight than you or I will face. Eight thousand more of those, sorted for just that one song by Shadow Phoenix. (lyrics)

Some people on the Western world's eastern front trying to hold onto an open society. (TW: war is awful.) Maybe your granddad did this from a trench facing Hitler's tanks — for you, and us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 20th century.

But the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years then either. Popular history remembers the 1945 victory over the Nazis and the joyous homecoming. Less remembered are the defeats and grim prospects from 1939 through early 1943.

Some Americans have felt called there because they were more able than most. They will be remembered as heroes for humanity. By comparison, the rest of us have it easy.

Remember, the Ukrainians say they are doing this for us too. They are correct. The global struggle between a brighter future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, ‘A Big Step Back’: In Ukraine, Concerns Mount Over Narrowing Press Freedoms. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — leading to the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. And they're stamping hard on the old culture of everyday, petty corruption.  More on that.  More; "Ukraine shows that real development happens when people believe they have an ownership stake in their own societies."

Wrote US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic early in the war, 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”

They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized, mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

It's this tough.  "You've lived your life — go to the front!"
Army recruiting pamphlets for oldsters at a kiosk
in a train station.

----------------------------------

Social attitudes in Ukraine are mostly traditional, rooted in a thousand years of the Orthodox Church. But in the last generation the ideal of modern European civil society has become widely treasured. The status of women has fast advanced throughout society, especially post-invasion. More than 43,000 women volunteer in the armed forces, not just in support roles and as drone pilots but as combat officers, artillery gunners, tankers, battlefield medics, snipers, and infantry. Some LGBT folx in the armed forces display symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, with official approval, whereas in Russia it's a prison-worthy crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay." A report on Ukraine's LGBT+ and feminist acceptance revolutionsAnotherAnotherAnother. War changes things.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must have our full support for them to win their security, freedom, and future. Speak up for it. Like, right now.
                                     
A Russian writer grieves: "My country has fallen out of time."


Ukrainian women soldiers in dense undergrowth
Women defenders on our world's eastern front

PPS:  U.S. authori-tarians, such as Sen. Ted Cruz, say that allowing even the most capable women into front-line roles is a woke plot to weaken America's armed forces. Ukraine puts that shit to bed. Do you have a relative who talks like that? Send them this video link to Vidma, a junior lieutenant who commands a mortar platoon, recounting one of their many battles.

Update Feb. 2025: More than two years later Vidma is still alive, still at the front, and posting TikToks. Her mortar unit has graduated to heavy artillery. A young girl who looks high-school age showed up to join themanother vid with her. Their lives, and their promising society, depend on us. 

And maybe our own? Says Maine's independent Senator Angus King,


Whenever people write to my office [asking why we are supporting Ukraine,] I answer, 'Google Sudetenland, 1938.' We could have stopped a murderous dictator who was bent on geographic expansion…at a relatively low cost. The result of not doing so was 55 million deaths.

     

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,