Polyamory in the News
. . . by Alan M.



January 3, 2023

Compersion, the polyam future, and some necessary dashes of cold water


A nonbinary couple kissing on a wooden walkway overlooking a lake
Getty
●  As 2022 neared its end, the BBC published Love and sex in 2022: The five biggest lessons of the year (Dec. 20). The lessons were:

–  "People are moving away from long-held binaries"
–  Some are trying to improve "the increasingly bleak world of dating"
–  Breaking up is harder in this economy
–  Bed death
–  and of course,


...Openness towards many kinds of non-traditional relationships has gained visibility, too. Ethical non-monogamy has been all over TikTok, often in the form of polyamorous relationships, in which more than two committed romantic and sexual partners cohabit. Then there are open relationships, which can look like anything from partners who hook up with other couples together, to those who have separate relationships with others outside their primary partnership. There are also poly people who prefer to live solo, embracing a ‘solo polyamorous’ lifestyle, through which they live alone but engage in multiple, committed relationships. Others to choose to cohabit with platonic partners, forming lasting relationships and even buying homes and planning futures with close friends rather than lovers. 


The whole long article is more interesting and thoughtful than I expected.
 

●  Women's Health is on a roll. What Is Compersion? Experts Share How It Can Help Polyamorous And Monogamous Relationships (Dec. 12). But some of it is out of tune. 


By Lexi Inks

...Generally, the community defines the concept as feeling happy that your partner is happy—even if with their other partners.


Actually, "compersion" means the happy glow specifically over your partner's romantic or sexual involvement with another partner — not them being happy about just anything. The word has been poly-specific ever since it was invented in a group meeting of the Kerista commune for that particular feeling they often felt happening in multi-relationships. Previously there was no word for it.


Obviously, no single solution can be a one-size-fix-all for every relationship, but compersion has become a widely accepted pathway to peace for people in relationships that fall under the non-monogamy umbrella.

...“Compersion is fairly new on the scene, so it might take some practice to find it in yourself, but let me assure you, it is in there somewhere,” says Dossie Easton, marriage and family therapist and co-author of The Ethical Slut. “A lot of us experience jealousy that we don't want, so compersion can offer a pathway to a better place.”

...Confronting the jealousy you or your partner might be feeling in your relationship can be a super emotionally-charged process, and might not end well if it’s not handled with care. With compersion, polyamorous people especially have found a way to simplify that process and help those who feel jealous take ownership of their own emotions.

_____________________________
Related Stories
_____________________________

...Some non-monogamous folks consider compersion to be the antithesis of jealousy... “but I’m not a fan of that because you can definitely feel both at the same time,” explains certified sex educator Angel Kalafatis-Russell, MS, CSE. ...

...Easton recommends trying to foster good relationships with your metamours as a way to enhance feelings of compersion.

“That may be inviting someone out for a hike or a game of pool, or helping them move, or making chicken soup if they get sick. The point is to nurture a friendship that feels like family to all its members, while we acknowledge that we have a responsibility to support positive connections with our lovers' lovers,” she explains. Nurturing a positive connection with your metamours can help ease feelings of jealousy or insecurity in each of you.


All wonderful if it happens, or can be helped to happen. But finally the piece gets to this:


And even though you’re polyamorous, you don’t necessarily have to feel compersion all the time, [Michelle] Hy says. In fact, it’s totally possible to have a healthy and well-functioning poly dynamic without it. ...

What if I’m in a monogamous relationship?

...It’s okay—and healthy, in fact—for your partner to find fulfillment in [things] other than you.

“...You might want to think about the pleasure you feel witnessing someone you love enjoying a particularly wonderful flavor of ice cream, or a transcendent chocolate truffle. That might make it easier to notice your own feelings when you witness a lover's delight in something that isn't about you,” Easton shares. ... Putting the pressure on yourself or your S.O. to be each other’s everything is unfair, and can cause codependent or possessive behaviors....





Graphic of an unlocked padlock-heart
Getty













By Mark Travers

...Research by [NYU professor Dr. Zhana] Vrangalova... makes it clear that non-monogamy is not a fringe desire.... But is the desire to be sexually active outside of your primary relationship amoral? A better question, according to Vrangalova, is why these desires feel so natural.

Photo of Dr. Zhana Vrangalova, middle-age-looking woman
Zhana Vrangalova

Vrangalova explains that while the need for security and companionship is present in every human being, there is another desire in all of us ... for novelty, exploration, and experience-seeking. According to her, non-monogamy is a manifestation of this desire.

“There are evolutionary arguments to be made for both needs,” says Vrangalova. “Long-term relationships fill the need of security, trust, and stability, which is the most important basic need. However, that need is separate from experience-seeking. The reality is that humans have both of these needs.”

Our culture, Vrangalova warns, is currently too intolerant of what she calls ‘negotiated non-monogamy’ — which, for some couples, is a way to satisfy both needs.

“To start, we need to change the default assumption that we’re going to fall in love and never have outside sexual desires again,” says Vrangalova.

...Here are three pieces of advice she gives for couples who want to dabble in non-monogamy:

   – Talk about your sexual fantasies. The starting point for any couple should be to have an open and honest conversation about the things they desire sexually. Shame can chip away at the strongest of bonds. 

   – Go slow with non-monogamy. There are degrees of openness in any open relationship. ...

   – Put effort into your sex life. We need to invest energy into our sexual satisfaction. ... “It’s easier to maintain sexual desire than bring it back from the dead,” says Vranglova.

We are entering a time of greater honesty. It’s just a matter of time before the facade of monogamy falls. But don’t think of it as the end of long-term relationships.”



● Advice from the co-founder of Feeld: A Guide To Dating When Polyamorous (Bustle, Dec. 12).


Approaching it with curiosity can really transform the experience into a journey of self-discovery and growth.

Interview with Ana Kirova, by Lexi Inks

One form of ethical non-monogamy (ENM) is polyamory. ... “We have definitely witnessed increasing understanding and acceptance of ethical non-monogamy, and conversations surrounding the topic are increasingly common and continue to grow,” [Feeld CEO Ana] Kirova tells Bustle. ...

Bustle: If someone is new to non-monogamy/polyamory, how do you suggest they approach that topic with potential new partners?

Kirova: I would start by reading about different relationship structures to build some understanding and confidence on the topic. ... Using language that reflects your experience is always helpful: ‘I would like to’, ‘I feel,’ etc. are great ways to begin sharing your experience. Last but not least, be open-minded and curious about the conversations you are opening, and listen to your partner as well.

What are some examples of ways to open a conversation about polyamory when you're on a date with someone who might not be polyamorous?

...I can’t stress enough the importance of open and honest communication. Be clear when stating your desires and boundaries, and meet their questions with patience and honesty. ... Explain your position, why polyamory works for you, and how you came to this place.

...Above all, just as you expect to be met with patience and minimal judgment, honor your date by reacting to their feedback and concerns in the same way. ...

What advice would you give to someone who is new to polyamory and enters a pre-existing polycule via a new relationship?

It might seem like an obvious thing, but be curious, communicate a lot, and check in with yourself and your partners. ... Approaching a pre-existing polycule can be a wonderful journey of self-discovery. ...


●  Here's a hard-assed look at whether you should get into this thing at all: Polyamory Is Not for Most. Is It For You? (The Good Men Project, Dec. 16; reprinted from Medium.) Amid the hearts-and-flowers stories and advice, some hard-assedness is especially important for us to put out there now that poly enthusiasm is going mass-market.


A dozen young adults around a picnic table outdoors at night, with a guitar-like instrument
Valiant Made / Unsplash


















By Mona Lazar

...First, let’s decide what polyamory is not:

It’s not a space where everybody has sex with everybody else. ... It’s not a space where it’s ok to sleep with others without consent from your other partners. ... It’s not for commitment-phobes; you need to commit to a whole array of people.

Then, let’s see why most of the time it doesn’t work:

1. It’s used as a front for something else.

Let’s face it, the concept of polyamory is highly used and abused. A lot of people out there use it as nothing more than a label that says ‘I’m this cool modern guy who wants to sleep with everybody around and if you’re not ok with that, you’re not cool.”

...Here’s what is uncool: pretending you’re the cool girl or the cool wife who is ok with any sort of sexual activity just to please your partner.

2. It’s not for introverts. [As an introvert, I disagree –ed.]

The problem is in the name. Poly = several/ many/ much/ multi.

As an introvert, you hardly have enough mental space and energy for one more, let alone 7. Or 27.

Poly comes with a lot of meetings, a lot of schedules, a lot of things to do together with the whole extended family. Various people keep coming and going, there are strangers you keep meeting and friends who leave. Or they don’t leave, they stay as adjacent to the polycule, without being romantically or sexually involved with anyone anymore.

The bottom line, the group gets bigger and bigger. ...Which is no big deal for an extrovert. ... 

3. Unless it’s double-sided, it can be abusive.

It doesn’t happen in every case, but it does happen. A lot.

There are some [good] one-sided poly relationships out there. This means that one side of the couple is poly and the other is monogamous and they’re both ok with that.

More often than not, however, you have the monogamous side who fell hard for a poly [person] and is accepting him for who he is but doesn’t have their own needs met. ...

Also, things get more severe and downright abusive when the poly partner actively pushes polyamory as a way to coerce the other party into various religious or cult-like situations. Yes, it happens.

4. It’s a lot more work than anybody imagines.

If you don’t want extra work when you come back from work, poly is just not for you. Relationships are difficult even one-to-one. ...

5. Some poly concepts are not psychologically correct.

For example, the concept of egalitarian polyamory (not having a main partner, but all partners being equal) is humanly unattainable. The brain doesn’t work that way.... You prefer one of them. And it’s only natural.

It’s also not a big happy family. It’s a family, and all families come with a lot of work to make them functional and happy.


Actually, there are times when those two concepts are indeed psychologically correct:  1) While you're deep in NRE (new-relationship energy) with everyone and/or with polyam itself, and  2) When everything in the group is going swimmingly. Neither of those two states is stable or permanent. As with any long-term relationship or marriage, what matters is how well everyone does it after the new wears off and you're making the transition into a hopefully nice, warm ordinary.


Conclusion:

Can it work out for some? Absolutely.

One of my poly friends is part of a polycule that takes pride in mutual respect, common values, and a belief that love shouldn’t be limited by anything else but consent.

They make it work, but she agrees it takes a lot of work.

For her, it’s worth it because she just couldn’t imagine life any other way. She is poly down to her bones.

Can it work for everyone who takes a whack at it? Absolutely not. It works for very few. Because it’s logistically and psychologically difficult even when you are poly down to your bones.

But... just because it’s difficult doesn’t mean it’s unattainable. And if it fails, there’s always a place for you with most.


Even as an introvert I've never found poly that difficult. You avoid so many messes with careful (or lucky) partner selection. That, plus knowing the personal boundaries you need to set around yourself, and cultivating a mutual habit of easy, fearless communication.



Triad of three people with arms around each other, seen from the back
●  Another cautionary piece: Five Reasons Polyamory Might Not Be Right For You, and What to Consider Instead (Rebellious, "magazine for women," Jan. 1)


By Jera Brown

...In polyamorous circles, there can be an air of superiority over those who choose monogamy. A belief that polyamorous folks are somehow more enlightened for having escaped the trap of monogamy.

But this misses the point [of the poly-awareness movement], which is that how you do relationships should be a choice. To me, understanding that you have a choice is where any sort of “relationship enlightenment” starts.

So anyway, polyamory is great. But is it right for you? 

Four Reasons Polyamory Might Not Be Right For You:

1. You’re Just Trying To Save a Failing Relationship

In my experience, this is one of the most common reasons why couples open up their relationship. And it’s not a good idea.... [Exception:] In the past, I’ve encouraged folks in relationships with mismatched sex drives to consider non-monogamy. ... So what’s the difference?  Communication.

2. You’re Not Great at Articulating Boundaries/Needs And You’re Not Going to Start Now...
3. You’re Not Willing to Sit With Jealousy
4. You’re Primarily In it for the Sex
5. You’re Feeling Pressured Into It

If you’re convinced that polyamory might not be for you, here are some alternatives to consider.

1.  Swinging...
2. Monogamish...
3. Relationship Anarchy...
4. Deliberate Monogamy... [also called "conscious monogamy," as opposed to "default monogamy."]
5. Ambiamory...  It’s a relationship structure or identity which means people can find satisfaction in either monogamy or non-monogamy.  And it’s basically a nod to the reality that everything in life is fluid. ...


●  Speaking of not-for-most: An early goal in the polyamory movement was to make it a widespread social norm for couples, when a relationship starts becoming serious, to discuss whether they want to be open or closed — before getting in too deep to back out of a major incompatibility.

Right up there with the "Do you ever want kids?" question.

This would save so much misery and divorce from assuming "Everybody goes monogamous when they love someone!" and never talking about it. Or daring to.

Fourteen years ago, sitting in a discussion circle at a Loving More retreat in upstate New York listening to Diana Adams strategizing, I remember thinking that reversing such a deep, cultural talk-taboo in a country of 300 million people... well... good luck with that.

But now it's happening. Especially among the upcoming generation. Including couples explicitly committing to monogamy. The Gen Z term is "defining the relationship," as in (shyly offering with moo eyes) "Maybe it's time to define our relationship." 

One example of many: Monogamy Agreements Are a Thing — and Relationship Experts Think You Should Make One (InStyle, a big women's mag; Dec. 14). As the article says, monogamy-agreed couples may have very different unspoken ideas about what would go against their agreement.


Yes, even if you think you're on the same page about what constitutes cheating in your monogamous relationship.

Couple sitting together writing a monogamy agreement
Monogamy agreement in formation. (InStyle / Getty)


















By Dr. Jenn Mann

...Typically, couples who practice non-monogamy outline in detail what non-monogamous activities are considered OK in the coupledom. One of the strengths of these types of relationships is a tendency to talk through all of the possibilities of where things could go wrong and very clearly outline the boundaries. This is where monogamous couples have a lot to learn from their non-monogamous counterparts.

Now, more and more monogamous couples in long-term relationships or marriages are catching on, and choosing to create monogamy agreements. These agreements outline, in writing, how monogamy is defined in your particular relationship. By outlining different nuances and categories where things could go wrong, they are attempting to preemptively avoid cheating (however they define it) and keep the lines of communication open.

...  Putting your monogamous agreement in writing requires the two of you to have deep discussions, define what is monogamy to each of you, and get clarity on how the two of you will define it in your relationship. This type of high-level communication can help avoid problems in the future and strengthen the bond between the two of you.

...Not to mention, it could allow the two of you to enjoy certain behaviors that you might not have shared together without the clarity. For example, one couple I know is sexually exclusive but allow one another to flirt via text or messaging.
 
....In order to create a monogamy agreement, you need to sit down with your partner and have some serious conversations. ... What is most important about monogamy to each of you? Get specific about what exactly constitutes cheating and what might be grounds for a breakup? 

....Here are some categories to consider....
Sexual contact....
Social media...
Flirting...
Emotional intimacy...
Sexting...
Pornography...
Sex workers...
Masturbation....






...That night over wine and sushi in a booth at one of our favorite restaurants, I asked my boyfriend for an open relationship—and he agreed!

…Two weeks later, we were broken up. And I was…actually kind of relieved, TBH. I was forced to confront an uncomfortable truth, one I knew I’d been hiding from for a while: I didn’t actually want an open relationship. What I wanted was to be single.

...As consensual non-monogamy becomes increasingly visible, I think there’s a growing tendency to view open relationships as a panacea for any and all relationship problems, particularly when those problems involve a desire for sex outside of said relationships. ... 

...“Opening up to other sexual partners is a good alternative for couples who are relatively happy in their relationship overall, and the major reason for dissatisfaction comes from the monogamous nature of the relationship itself,” says [Dr. Zhana] Vrangalova.

That said, open relationships are very much not the free ticket to the Have Your Cake and Eat It Too buffet we sometimes fancy them. For one thing, the emotional energy and communication that goes into maintaining an open relationship is no joke. This means they need a rock-solid foundation to actually work. Introducing non-monogamy to a failing relationship in an attempt to salvage it is, frankly, unlikely to go well. Think of it as the modern version of having a baby to save your marriage. It may be a temporary distraction, but it’s probably going to do more harm than good in the long run.

...As I learned firsthand, however, it’s harder than it sounds to tell whether opening up is actually a healthy move that will strengthen your relationship, or a Band-Aid you’re slapping over issues you’d simply rather ignore. ...



Men's Health: What 'Polycule' Means in the World of Polyamory (Dec. 19). A  heart-warming educational piece, long.


By Suzannah Weiss

A polycule is a group of polyamorous people who join to create a family of sorts.


Well okay, if "family" can also mean "extended family," where some may have little to do with others but still feel they're in this thing together.

     
Four young adults happily chatting over a picnic in a city park
Igor Alecsander / Getty
...People in a polycule may all be dating one another, or some members of a polycule may only date one person within it. ... Some members of polycules will have a primary partner, which may be a live-in partner, a spouse, or someone they spend most of their time with. Other polycules may be less hierarchical, where all people are equally intertwined with one another and may even all live together.

...“Polycules may function like a family, where everyone gets together and enjoys each other's company, but not necessarily on a romantic level,” explains Rhiannon John, a sexologist at BedBible. “But other polycules may have less to do with each other, only meeting on certain occasions, like the birthday of a common partner.”

The one thing all polycules have in common, though, is that they sign on to the arrangement and respect one another’s boundaries. “A key aspect to practicing nonmonogamy is that all participants are aware of the relationships formed, and open discussion occurs to ensure everyone agrees to the terms of [their] relationships,” says Williams.

How do rules and boundaries work within polycules?...

How do I have a healthy polycule?

...“It's important to form some infrastructure for the members to check in with one another on a proactive basis,” DeRosa says. This may mean blocking out time each week for everyone to talk....

Many of the discussions that [Jon] Simons has to maintain healthy relationships with his partners, especially those he lives with, involve humdrum things like schedules, chores, and finances. “Not having these conversations can build up resentment,” he says. ...

Why do people form polycules?

...For some people, polycules provide a community that allows them to connect with the partners of someone they already know and love. “I like that everyone gets along, so then, I can spend time with multiple partners at once,” says [Leanne] Yau. “My partners can bond over their mutual appreciation of me.”

For Sallie, being in a polycule means more love and support, as well as sexual variety. “I can experience quite poor mental health, and having more people to support me helps enormously,” she says. “I don’t feel like I’m such a burden, and my partners can feel less isolated.”

Simons also enjoys having a support network of different people who meet different needs. ...“I’m a big proponent of chosen family, and polyamory is definitely one of the ways I achieve that.”



Six smiling young adults pressing together in a cityscapeale
●  Sociologist Elisabeth Sheff, in her blog The Polyamorists Next Door, considers some unromantic reasons why millennials and zoomers are taking so naturally to the concept: Polyamory as an Adaptive Strategy in an Unstable World (Dec. 28). "While CNM is in its third wave in the United States, having started with the anarchists of the 1880s and enjoyed a robust resurgence in the 1960s, its current wave is the most socially significant and widespread by far."

Some unsexy factors she proposes are that the rising generations expect a long life of unstable employment, frequent moves, and economic precariousness permanently.


Red bumpersticker reading "Monogamy? In this economy?"
SquidlyCo

They will have 12 jobs before they are 40 and then change careers yet again, live in five different cities by the time they turn 60 and still need to start a new job when they “retire.”... The majority of millennials and zoomers will almost certainly have lives of constant change. Why should their relationships be the only thing that takes one form and remains that way for the rest of their lives? Choosing a relationship style that flexes with their changing circumstances makes a lot of sense.... 


But here's another factor I've observed: People under 35 have spent more years living in group apartments and group houses than any other generation alive today. Because of the economy. Accordingly, as they've matured, I've seen them develop better roommate skills on average than we had. A fair amount of polycule group life simply boils down to good roommate skills.


Movie and TV list: Can somebody please make a really good one?? More than two dozen movies and TV shows with poly themes are posted by Reddit user u/halvoid, who briefly rates the 14 they've watched and asks readers to help fill out the list.

Does anyone know of a comprehensive list, limited to actual polyam relationships, with descriptions and reviews? Many people have started lists online, but I don't know of one that is even slightly complete and clearly defined (unburdened by clutter entries) and informative and maintained. If you know of one, or start one, I'll help publicize it!               

●  Last year Ken Haslam endowed a permanent annual $5,000 Relationship Diversity Research Fellowship through the Kinsey Institute for grad students and other researchers studying ethical non-monogamy. Last year's award went to Dr. Amy Moors of Chapman University. This year's recipient was just announced: Dr. Rhonda Balzarini of Texas State University. Press release.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Meanwhile,

“This struggle will define in what world our children and grandchildren will live, and then their children and grandchildren. It will define whether it will be a democracy for Ukrainians and for Americans.

Volodymyr Zelensky to the U.S. Congress

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many good progressive movements die out because they failed to scan the wider world correctly and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside their worldview, we expose its incompleteness.

Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend totally on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

Russian cartoon character Masyanya proudly holding a Ukraine flag
The Russian family-cartoon series Masyanya
turned dissident. Watch. The cartoonist has fled.
Update: a brilliant sequel of turnabout, with a
coda of empathy in wartime. 
 
Such a society is only possible where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

People, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, abusive police powers, or eventually, artillery and terror.

For what it's worth, this site has received more pagereads from Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For now, you can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of vetted organizations or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, a project of an old friend of my wife (story).

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, we unexpectedly find ourselves witnessing the most consequential war of our lifetimes. Because we have entered another time when calculating fascism, at home and abroad, is rising and sees freedom and liberalism and social tolerance as weak, degenerate, delusional  inviting easy pushovers. As Russia thought it saw in Ukraine.

The coming times are going to require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Play thisAnother version, on the streets of Kherson the night after its liberation November 11. More? Just some guys in Kharkiv (our Pizza for Ukraine town) helping to hold onto a free and open society, a shrinking thing in the world. The tossed grenade seems to have saved them. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and for us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they're doing it for us too. They are correct.  The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. It's likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And it has quite the history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — until the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that. (More.)

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic (Sept. 7), 


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through as well as they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine are generally traditional, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. Some 57,000 women volunteer in all roles in the armed forces, flooding traditionally male bastions, including as combat officers, platoon leadersartillery gunners, tankers, and snipers. LGBT folx in the armed forces openly wear symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, whereas in Russia it's a crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin or "say gay."

And in November, Russia made it a crime not just to speak for LGBT recognition, but to speak for "non-traditional sexual relations." Until recently Russia had a polyamory education and awareness movement.

Polyfolks are like one ten-thousandth of what's at stake globally. Ukraine must receive our support for as long as it takes. Speak up and demand it.

"Defenders of Bakhmut": painting of a woman soldier under fire in a trench holding up a Ukraine flag
"Defenders of Bakhmut," where Zelensky spoke to soldiers at the front line a day before he spoke to Congress. They gave him a battle flag that they signed, which he presented to Nancy Pelosi. Art by Natasha Le in Mikolaiv, who reinterprets traditional guardian angels as riot grrls for an upcoming generation.
--------------------

PS: A real-life version in Bakhmut; the artwork is more than fantasy.  (Jan. 3, 2023)


[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , ,



September 4, 2022

Polyam dream home. Poly attachment theory, metamours, managing finances, the BBC on one of our top podcasters, and more.


●  Dream home? A mom in an MFM vee triad with kids, living in a house they all moved into together, writes of having it all. I'm polyamorous and live with my partners and our children. Here's how we make it work. The story appeared in the home/ health /parenting section of Insider (Aug. 30) and is getting reprinted elsewhere. 

Normal is as normal does.


Ty, Jennifer, and Daniel




















By Jennifer Martin

...I've got two kids: D, who's 11, and H, who's 9. I also have two live-in partners. There's Daniel, my legal spouse and the biological father of D and H, and Ty, my unofficial spouse and co-parent. But we are not a throuple; Daniel and Ty do not date each other, and I switch beds between the two. 

Daniel and I opened our marriage in 2016. Our kids were 6 and 3 at the time. We opted to join a local polyamory group that was family-friendly, and we brought our kids to many events to be educated about it and meet other polyamorous families, which helped normalize it for my kids at a young age. We didn't think we'd ever actually live with another partner, though. ... 

That changed with Ty, who was single when we met. We started dating in 2018, and in 2020 — right before the pandemic — the five of us moved into a new house together. ... As we all bunkered down at home together during the pandemic, we bonded in a really special way and spent so much time together. Soon, my kids began to think of Ty as a parent, too.

Parenting while polyamorous might seem complicated, but having multiple adults in the house while raising children is actually a dream come true. Someone is always around to watch the kids, and there are plenty of people to do chores, especially since my kids are older. We each have our "specialties" — I like to create meal plans and cook, Ty manages laundry. Daniel does the dishes, D takes out the trash, and H feeds the pets. Oh, and another benefit to multiple adults under one roof? Three incomes. ...

...Though Ty is not a biological parent of my children, he will legally get guardianship and all my assets in the unlikely event that something happens to me and Daniel. He has also sworn to be there for my kids even if we break up, but so far, that seems unlikely; we are really happy, and what we're doing works for us. I love being a polyamorous parent and I never want to go back — and my kids love having multiple parents around, too. ...



The BBC chose Dedeker Winston of the Multiamory podcast to lead off a long and engaging article for a global audience: The rising curiosity behind open relationships (Aug. 5).


Dedeker Winston has been in non-monogamous relationships for more than a decade, yet she has never seen such keen interest in open relationships.

...In 2014, when she started the Multiamory podcast, she and her co-producers had to decide whether to use their real names on the ethical non-monogamy show. “At that point, there was pretty much only one or two other podcasts actually broaching this subject,” says the dating coach. “And the people who were producing and hosting those podcasts used pseudonyms.” 

(The BBC used a ho-hum stock photo
instead of, say, Dedeker and her team.)


But things have changed. Around 2016, Winston noticed a real “explosion of interest around non-monogamy”, about a year after she started work as a dating coach specialising in those types of relationships. “That was when I feel like I saw the biggest turning point, of all of a sudden so many people online being willing to talk about being non-monogamous,” she says, “and to express the fact that they have an interest in these sorts of things.”

Sarah Levinson, a counsellor at Creative Relating Psychology Psychotherapy in New York City, who specialises in sexuality and relationship dynamics, has also noticed an increasing interest in open relationships within the past decade. “It was much more obscure 10 years ago, and now it's incredibly common,” she says. 

...Open relationships fall under the non-monogamy umbrella, but many tend to differentiate between those types of arrangements and other types of non-monogamy, like polyamory. Polyamory often means participating in multiple intimate partnerships, while open relationships are more often associated with people engaging in primarily sexual relationships outside of their prioritised, two-person partnership. In other words, open relationships are less focused on emotional connections with people outside a primary relationship, and more on sexual ones.

...Among Winston’s client base, podcast listeners and website visitors, she’s found many who are interested or participating in open relationships tend to skew relatively young – between the ages of 25 and 45. And many identify as queer, bisexual and/or pansexual. ...

---------------------------------------

...“Among more than 1 million UK-based OkCupid users who responded to the question ‘Would you consider having an open relationship?’ in the app, 31% percent said yes in 2022, compared to 29% in 2021 and 26% in 2020.”

...And for those who are curious, there are more resources than ever. Along with the “explosion of interest” in open relationships, adds Winston, there’s an “explosion in content creators and people writing about it in media… in apps, in community meetups”. This means information about non-monogamy is widely accessible – not in “old, dusty LiveJournals [personal online journals] in the corners of the internet”, which is where Winston says she needed to look for information more than a decade ago. 

...“Research and public opinion polls suggest that attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy are mostly negative overall, although they appear to have trended more positive in recent years,” says Dr Justin Lehmiller, Kinsey Institute research fellow and host of the Sex and Psychology Podcast. 

...While Levinson agrees there will be a continued increase in “creative relationship structures” for similar reasons, she doesn’t think it will become a global phenomenon. Too many cultures around the world present challenges to people hoping to open their relationships, and the taboo remains globally prevalent. ...


But that's only partly true. British journalist Jonathan Kent, in his recent book A World Beyond Monogamy, interviews at length more than 40 people in various cultures around the world living in consensually non-monogamous relationships of an egalitarian nature. 


●  CNBC, a business news channel, has put up a solid 9-minute video on how a quad family of two couples manage their household finances (Aug. 25). The four of them took a pretty radical step.




Rachel, Kyle, Ashley and Yair are two married couples in a non-monogamous relationship. They share a house, car, dog, cat, partners and finances. They also have plans to have children together. Obstacles they've faced having to do with rights and benefits as four partners have prompted them to meet with a lawyer to get divorced from one another and create a co-habitation agreement. Watch this video to learn how they manage finances in their non-traditional relationship.  

The group goes into greater depth in a 1 hour 19 minute episode of Rachel's own podcast The Wright Conversations, made a few days after the CNBC video went up: Ep 9: A Conversation About My Polyamorous Fam: A Sit Down Conversation with my Primary Partners (Aug. 31) 


●  In other business media, the Australian Financial Review reviews Polysecure, the hit book by U.S. therapist Jessica Fern (2020): How to navigate polyamorous relationships (Aug. 26).

The reviewer is clearly skeptical of the whole concept but is partially won over.


Multiple partners should be seen as less of a novelty and more of a valid romance model, says the author of a new book.

By Tanveer Ahmed

In the various niches of psychological counselling, a polyamorous therapist who focuses on clients practising ethical non-monogamy is not a well-established subspecialty.

But that is the world of Jessica Fern, an American counsellor, whose book Polysecure adds to the literature questioning monogamy and what she calls “couple privilege”.

...[A] study by British scientist Dr Anne-Laure Le Cunff from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College unexpectedly discovered that women were more comfortable with the idea of non-monogamy than men.

...[Fern] attacks her subject matter by extensively examining attachment theory, the model of human bonding [currently enjoying a renaissance] espoused by British psychoanalyst John Bowlby. The vast bulk of her polyamorous clients have some kind of disruption in their early life bonding, she observes, whether through neglect, trauma or familial chaos. [Which is probably why they sought her out in particular.]

This then manifests in complications in their ability to form secure attachments....

She helps her clients navigate the complex terrain of non-monogamous relationships, which are inherently insecure. They vary from open marriages and swinging to what she refers to as hierarchical and non-hierarchical variations of polyamory. 

There is a whole new vocabulary in the subculture. I learnt the term metamour ....

As Fern observes in detail in one of the chapters, fidelity, security and boundaries all need constant negotiation when occurring outside the traditional structures.

Polysecure is ready to help with an exhaustive list of questions and activities to help partners realise their relationship goals.

Such complexity took the racy edge out of the practice for this reader, but her outline highlights the Westminster-level sexual politics that require eternal vigilance.

...In a compelling observation, Fern says Western society places too much emphasis on romantic love in couplets. This, she argues, is ultimately destabilising. Other cultures still steeped in family, clan and tradition allow for wider varieties of strong attachments in adulthood, be it with siblings, relatives or close friends.

...For all my initial perceptions of debauchery, Polysecure’s power is ultimately in being a unique contribution towards understanding the most fundamental of human tasks, in how to give and receive love.


Another review of Polysecure just appeared in Australia's The Saturday Paper (Sept. 3, print and online):


...Practical advice makes up a smaller portion of the book than I expected. Parts 1 and 2 respectively introduce the existing canon of work on attachment theory and non-monogamy, so it’s really only the final third of the book that delivers strategies for navigating love and commitment in the context of trauma. Fern’s nested model of trauma – which considers global and societal factors such as environmental anxiety and capitalism alongside the domestic and familial – is useful, intuitive and a welcome shift away from paradigms that focus too narrowly on an individual’s childhood and home life. But it’s not exactly groundbreaking, either. I often found myself thinking, “Yes, and…?” Like, of course we’re all deeply heartbroken by this world!

So I found myself a sometimes frustrated reader, especially when Fern speaks more to the transition into CNM rather than CNM alone. But that’s a common feature of the genre, shaped by the bigger market share of curious monogamists compared with readers who are already practising polyamory. I did appreciate that Fern is careful not to assume a hierarchy of primary versus secondary partners, or that all relationships must escalate towards committed, secure attachment. ...


BTW, Fern has a companion workbook coming out, The Polysecure Workbook: Healing Your Attachment and Creating Security in Loving Relationships. Its publication date is November 25 but you can preorder.


●  About your metamours, those crucial but adjustable-involvement adjuncts to your polyam relationship: What I Learned From Dinner With My Husband’s Girlfriend (SheKnows, Aug. 10)


Ekaterina Popova/ Getty


















By Trish Fancher

She was terrifying. A tall, blonde vegan who was seven years younger than me — and she never wore a bra. She was my husband’s girlfriend.

...After they were dating for a few weeks, all three of us met for a drink at a run-down bar on the harbor. I wore a flowing yellow dress that showed off at least four inches of cleavage. I put on new lipstick and clenched my jaw. She arrived wearing a colorful flowing dress as well. She was certainly tall, blonde, and beautiful. I felt she was different from me in every way. ...

Over popcorn and wine, I remembered she was just a person, not a threat. Later, she’d become a friend. Now, dinner with my metamours—the polyam term for the partner of my partner—is an enriching part of my life.

...Until we sat down and shared a meal together, Per’s girlfriend was a threat — but in reality that threat was a figment of my imagination. Meeting her dispelled a fantasy. She wasn’t trying to take anything from me. She was a smart woman with her own life, needs, and desires. She could relate to Per about emotional experiences I didn’t understand. They added to each other’s happiness.

Now, these kinds of dinners are the norm and a source of joy. I practice “kitchen table polyamory,” which means that I hope all of my partners can, at the least, enjoy a nice meal together from time to time as friends. We have a group chat titled “In Pod We Trust”, a hold-over from when we were podded together earlier in the pandemic.

...Now, polyamory is an important and enriching part of my life. I still make mistakes: I hurt people and I get hurt. Deeply vulnerable relationships often include both joy and broken hearts. And it was often my metamours who helped me feel safe and cared for through the process. ...

My connections with my metamours are uniquely vulnerable and loving. My polyam community is my chosen family. We keep choosing each other and these complicated connections—with life-long loves, deep seated insecurities, heart breaks, and frequent tough conversations. We don’t choose each other because it’s easy. We choose each other because, through our complicated relationships, we can be deeply vulnerable and cared for.

This week, my entire polyam family was out of quarantine [following covid cases] for the first time in weeks. My ex-boyfriend’s wife texted our In Pod We Trust text thread to plan a picnic. Together with Per, his girlfriend, her husband and boyfriend, my ex and his wife, we feasted on a dinner of chips, hummus, figs, and pastries. We celebrated our recovery with the people with whom we can be the most vulnerable — and the people who know best how to care for me.


Polyfamily researcher Elisabeth Sheff has concluded from her 20-year study,


...The metamour relationships make or break the family over the long term. These emotionally intimate, non-sexual chosen family relationships are so important in polyamorous families that I made up the word polyaffective to describe them.

Positive polyaffective relationships among metamours who become chosen family over time are the backbone of the poly family. ... Metamours who add value to each others’ lives... can not only support each other when life inevitably throws them a curve ball, but also support the polyamorous relationship with their mutual partner if it falls on hard times. ...


 
●  Lexi Inks returned to monogamy after bad experiences, and brought back good lessons: I Used To Be In A Polyamorous Relationship — 3 Things Dating Multiple People Taught Me (YourTango, Aug. 2; reprinted from PopSugar.) 


I'm all too familiar with the perils of modern dating. It's exhausting, frustrating, and at times, a little excruciating. ... Each of these situations taught me some important learning lessons, but none more than my entrance into the world of polyamory.

...Speaking from experience, I can confirm that plenty of poly relationships are committed partnerships founded on love and deep connection.

My partner and I are monogamous now, although we can still be considered "closed" poly, because he has another long-distance partner.... My metamour is incredible and I could not be more thankful to have him in our lives.


Not sure about how words are used there, but...


Now that everything feels more stable in my love life, it's much easier to consider all the lessons polyamory taught me — both the good and the difficult.

1. Communication is everything. 
In monogamous relationships, there are a variety of ways in which a partner could "cheat." In polyamory, I believe the most prevalent way to cheat would be to lie or keep secrets. ...

Omitting and lying are dangerous in any relationship because those secrets are probably going to come out at some point and it almost always ends in disaster. Just talk to each other!

2. You don't need to be their everything. ...
Seriously, you should not be the only important person in your partner's life. ...

...In polyamory, if you allow that insecurity to fester without processing and talking to your partner about it, you won't be able to function when they're dating other people.

Honestly, this was one of the most difficult aspects of being poly that I experienced, but it made me a more self-assured person once I started the inner work to fight it and it also helps that my partner is phenomenal in working those issues out with me.

3. Your partner's happiness should be your happiness.

...Compersion, simply, is the poly term for being happy when and because your partner is happy. Their happiness is your happiness because you love them and want to see them thrive — in polyamory, that can sometimes be influenced by their connections with multiple people.

...Although ultimately I did end up discovering that polyamory didn't work for me, I have taken a lot of different qualities of the lifestyle with me into monogamy. ... While the lifestyle isn't for everyone, anyone can take these lessons and make their relationships deeper, more loving, and more fulfilling.


●  Speaking of compersion, Marie Thouin posts: "Finally published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior! New #compersion research co-authored by Sharon Flicker, Michelle Vaughan, and myself." Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Experience of Compersion Among Individuals in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships (online July 25). "Findings overlapped with results from prior research on the topic, and added new and important nuance to this emerging field of inquiry."

From the abstract:


The factors most commonly named by [the 44] participants as facilitating compersion included: feelings of self-worth, feeling secure and that one's needs were being met in the relationship with the partner, communication with one's partner, and positive regard for one's metamour. ... The study's results suggest multiple hypotheses ripe for future testing.


(The paper is paywalled except through an academic library; the link above is to the abstract and first page.)


●  They keep on coming: another British tabloid happy-polyfamily piece, this time an FFM vee. The story re-ran in the US edition of The Sun: Threesy Does It. We called off our engagement to be a throuple – now we swap partners every night but our sex contract has a golden rule (Aug. 16). 


Tom, Irie, Alex

 ...And they've even called off their engagement because they couldn't imagine getting married without Alex.

Law student Irie, from Oklahoma, says: “I feel lucky to have not one, but two people to love and cherish. “I didn’t think it’d be possible to love more than one person at a time, but with Tom and Alex, it’s so natural.”

...Although Alex is a lesbian, she went on ‘dates’ with Tom so they could build their connection.

Irie says: “Tom, Alex and I started sharing a bed together and eventually all became intimate as a trio and it was magical.

“Everything happened so naturally....”



●  The annual round of polyamory conferences, retreats, and other events continues to reassemble as people hope covid will be less of a thing. See Alan's List of Polyamory Events for what's scheduled for the next 12 months.   

Infection-control measures for these events range from strong to apparently lax. In July I went to the Center for a New Culture's poly-friendly Summer Camp East in the mountains of West Virginia and stayed on for several days afterward. The organizers, some of whom live onsite, had set out to turn the event into a giant safe pod, considering the expected closeness among the group. To get in you needed to send proof of full vaccination with boost and a negative PCR test taken no more than 48 hours before arrival. We were also asked to take extra precautions in the week leading up. On arriving onsite we got a rapid antigen test including tonsils as well as nose (to better catch the current variants), then rapid tests again daily for two more days, then every other day for the next four days.

It worked. Of the 300-plus rapid tests done onsite, the positivity rate was zero point zero. Nor did anyone of the 65 of us show symptoms, or report a case in the week-plus after leaving. When thoroughly screened with 100% compliance, a big group event like this in an isolated location seems pretty safe — even with lots of close contact for many days.


---------------------------------------------------------

Looking wider, the struggle deepens.

Why, some of you ask, have I been ending most posts to this polyamory news site with the Ukraine war? Including links like this one?

Because in my life, I've seen many progressive movements become irrelevant and die out by failing to scan the wider world correctly and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Some influential people say we're a threat to society — because by living successfully outside of their worldview, we expose its incompleteness. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

The Russian family-cartoon series Masyanya
turned dissident. Watch. The cartoonist has fled.
 
Such a society is only possible where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

People, communities, and societies that create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal protections that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, or, eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, this site has received more pagereads from Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in Eastern Europe.

For now, you can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of organizations vetted by the Washington Post, or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, a project of an old friend of my wife Sparkle Moose.

----------------------------------

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, this is the most consequential war of our lifetimes.

(See also, among others, Tom Friedman's I Thought Putin Invaded Only Ukraine. I Was Wrong.)

The coming times are going to require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Play this. Loud.

More, you want? Just some guys near Kharkiv (our Pizza for Ukraine town) helping to hold onto a free and open society, a shrinking thing in the world. The tossed grenade seems to have saved them. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and for us,  because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they're doing it for us too. They are correct.  The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. The situation is going to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

We'll have a better idea after the election. Whatever else you do, vote.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies (Reason, July 19). And the country had a history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — until the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that.

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic (Sept. 7),   


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organizing mutual aid that arises from community social trust: hromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through.

Social attitudes in Ukraine are generally traditional, but not bitterly so like in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. Some 40,000 women reportedly volunteer in combat roles, and LGBT folx in the armed forces openly wear symbols of LGBT pride. (Whereas in Russia, it's a criminal offense even to wear a tiny rainbow pin.) Writes kos in the big lefty news site Daily Kos (July 29),


I find [this] particularly salient given American conservative hostility toward women serving in our military. People like Ted Cruz praising the supposed manliness of the Russian army, while claiming ours is weak because of “woke culture.” Ukraine puts that bullshit to bed, not just with the women serving in its ranks, but with gay soldiers very publicly sewing unicorn patches on their uniforms to denote their pride.


He retweets a meme from a military blogger commenting on the plight of the abused gay Russian draftee:



To hell with any conservatives who impugn anyone’s service as somehow less effective or honorable than white straight men. 


_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________


[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , ,