"PolyFamily" reality series starts tomorrow on TLC, as quad member says it over-exaggerates drama. And other polyamory in the news
![]() |
TLC |
The Polyfamily teaser hints at major drama for the foursome involving jealousy, parenting conflicts, and a big reveal about who really fathered Taya’s unborn baby. Plus, the tension heats up when one person suggests bringing another person into their relationship. Will the quad be able to survive it all?Spoiler: Alysia, Tyler, Sean, and Taya are still together and going strong. After TLC announced the new show, Taya took to Instagram – where she posts updates as @polyfamory – to assure their 125,000+ followers that they had not broken up.“Just a reminder that filming was not recent, TV demands drama, and our family is stronger than ever,” she wrote in an Instagram Story on March 17. “Thank you for all your love and support.”In another post, Taya reminded people that what they’d see on the show wasn’t necessarily an accurate portrayal of their day-to-day lives.“PSA: If you can’t separate real life from TV, then protect your sanity and don’t watch,” she wrote.In a comment on another post, she noted that she has “zero control” over the show and how her family is portrayed.Given that there’s a risk that Polyfamily might misrepresent their lives, why do the show at all? Taya said that they still wanted to take the opportunity to show people what polyamory is really like.“We’ve always promised to take every opportunity that we could to normalize polyamory—and this is a big one,” she wrote on Instagram. “No matter what, one thing is for sure, we did our absolute best to represent love, family, and community in all its beautiful complexities.”“We are so incredibly grateful for each and every one of you who have shown us love, kindness, and support, you are the reason we get to share our story so far and wide,” she added. “Now.. buckle up! It’s going to be a wild ride.”
... Siobhan Marin travels Australia to meet people who are living beyond monogamy — in polyamorous relationships, throuples and open marriages.For many in this community, ethical non-monogamy isn’t just about sex. It’s about questioning traditional ideas around love, loyalty and commitment.Although polyamory is becoming more popular, especially among younger generations, it still carries challenges. We speak to couples and polycules about navigating boundaries, stigma, insecurities, and the natural feelings of jealousy that arise.0:00 Intro1:20 Polyamory in the suburbs3:26 The ups and down throuple life7:00 Breaking down the stigma of ethical non-monogamy10:31 Do soulmates still exist?12:24 Navigating relationships with multiple partners14:34 Heartbreak and healing in a polycule20:35 Raising kids in a poly family
Comedian Jacob Hawley explores the world of love, sex and intimacy -- and the people that make money from it.This week he hears about polyamory -- the act of having intimate relationships with more than one partner at a time. He sits down with his friends Stuart and Phoebe who have been experimenting with ethical non-monogamy, journalist Franki Cookney about her writing and life experience, polyamory expert Dr Elisabeth ‘Eli’ Sheff, and Ana Kirova, the CEO of dating app Feeld. (31 minutes)
We want to help people have healthier relationships. To do that, we need to better understand people’s actual wants, needs, and desires.Relationships come in all shapes and sizes for a bevy of reasons, but the research on relationship diversity is very limited. We’re on a mission to change that.
...He said he's able to date other women but his girlfriends must be exclusive to him. In addition, time management has become a major challenge for him. ...“I want you here, I don’t need you here… the most important thing here is my happiness," he said. “If a girl is acting up, she gotta go.”
"Oh, cool! And how do you do polyamory?
By Gabrielle Kassel
...Symbiosexuality is an orientation that describes an attraction to a pre-existing partnership, couple, throuple, or quad, says Jesse Kahn, LCSW, CST, a queer sex therapist and director of The Gender & Sexuality Therapy Center in New York City. For symbiosexuals, the dynamic, energy, interplay, and connection shared between partners is the primary source of attraction—rather than the specific individuals in the partnership or their unique traits, Kahn says. In other words, the sum is worth far more than its parts.Symbiosexuality varies as much as a SimCity Creation or New York Fashion Week line-up because “exactly what someone finds hot in a pre-existing partnership and why they find it hot will change from symbiosexual person to symbiosexual person,” says Kahn. ...
...Symbiosexuality refers to an attraction to the partnered unit, not to the unique individuals within that relationship, says Berkheimer. “For a symbiosexual to successfully be in a polyamorous relationship with those two individuals, they need to recognize both aspects: the beauty of the couple’s synergy and the individual gifts each partner brings to the table,” she adds.
...When it comes to relationships, polyamory is a non-starter for many.That’s a mistake, according to sex coach and podcaster Dr. Jaime Grant — who believes that the monogamy-minded are making their lives harder than they have to be.As humans, we’re meant to grow and change throughout life. Who you were five years ago might be a different version of the person you are today. Grant said in a [Radio New Zealand] article that it’s important for people to allow themselves that same freedom when exploring romantic relationships and adventures....The anti-pairing-off pro, who has lived a polyamorous lifestyle for over 40 years, said: “It’s helped me be braver about other risks I could take because I just wasn’t doing the norm, you know, I wasn’t marching in lockstep with everybody else around relationships.”Grant describes monogamous relationships as a “closed system” which can make things difficult — especially for parents. She believes being in a polyamorous relationship allows for even more care, love, and help than you would get from one partner.“I literally have a group of people who are deeply invested in my children and have supported me. These are not people I’m married to, these are my loves,” she said. ...
...A literature search... and an additional call for unpublished data, identified 35 suitable studies (N = 24,489). Meta-analytic results show null effects overall, suggesting that both [poly and mono] relationships (k = 29; g = -0.05, 95% CIs [−0.20, 0.10], p = .496) and sex (k = 17; g = 0.06, 95% CIs [−0.07, 0.18], p = .393) are equally satisfactory for monogamous and non-monogamous individuals. Sub-group analyses revealed that these overall effects did not vary according to sampling characteristics (e.g. LGBTQ+ vs. heterosexual samples), non-monogamy agreement types (e.g. open vs. polyamorous vs. monogamish), or relationship satisfaction dimension (e.g. trust vs. commitment vs. intimacy). There was no evidence of publication bias. Methodological challenges and directions for future research are discussed.
...The study, which analyzed data from 35 studies involving 24,489 people in the United States, Canada, Australia, Portugal, Italy, and other countries, found no significant differences in relationship or sexual satisfaction levels between individuals in monogamous and [openly] non-monogamous relationships."Monogamous relationships are often assumed to offer greater satisfaction, intimacy, commitment, passion and trust than non-monogamous ones. This widespread belief—what we term the 'monogamy-superiority myth'—is often reinforced by stereotypes and media narratives," says lead author, Associate Professor Joel Anderson, a Principal Research Fellow at the Australian Research Center in Sexuality, Health, and Society situated at La Trobe University. ...
...The team found that while some studies found relationship satisfaction was greater in monogamous relationships than non-monogamous relationships, other studies found the reverse to be true, and most found no difference at all.All participants were in relationships, with between 4.0% and 69.9% in non-monogamous set-ups, depending on the study. The research did not look at serial monogamy or affairs.The research has limitations, including that the type of non-monogamous relationship was not considered in many of the studies; participants were often recruited via social networks, meaning they were not necessarily representative of the whole population; and the studies relied on self-reporting, which can be biased.Anderson... said his work suggested that satisfaction in relationships was not about their structure, but how people communicated, connected and met each other’s needs. ...
“I didn’t know what polyamory was,” Melissa* says. “I didn’t have the vocabulary. I Googled it a few times to understand.” Melissa was on the “relationship escalator”. She got married, had a child, then the no longer happy couple split.So she started exploring her options. First stop? Singles’ groups.“Then I went down the rabbit hole of adult groups, sex groups,” the now 40-year-old says. “It was interesting to look at but it wasn’t really my thing … until the [Facebook] algorithm gave me ‘Brisbane Polyamory’.”..The Relationships Australia NSW chief executive officer, Elisabeth Shaw, who is also a clinical and counselling psychologist, says the guiding principle of polyamory and ENM is consent that is freely given.“It’s bringing ethics in relationships back to the fore in a principled way: ‘I want to be open, transparent and clear in what exactly I’m doing’,” she says. ...“People still want to get married [but] you have emerging new ways of relating.”A ‘dream’ of all living togetherWhile Melissa was discovering polyamory, something else was happening. She and her ex (they were still married) were talking. They were sharing what they liked and didn’t like about each other, and what kinks they were and weren’t into. They got back together. And she convinced him to go make new “friends”.“Each new person is a new opportunity to learn,” Melissa says, recalling her “first boyfriend” after getting back with her husband.She’s since broken up with that boyfriend and met someone new. Melissa’s “immediate polycule” is herself, her husband and boyfriend. The broader “constellation” includes her boyfriend’s submissive, and her husband’s “play partners”. There are others on the periphery, but they’re not involved in her day-to-day life.She’s moving into her husband’s home in May, where they will live together for the first time in eight years. There are other plans afoot.Melissa calls it a “a pipeline dream”.“We’ve started talking about what if we all moved in together on a large property, have plenty of room, other roommates, whatever situation can be accommodated. It’s still very much a fantasy land because we do have a daughter to accommodate as well.”Her advice to anyone interested in non-monogamy is to be curious and to research, but not get overwhelmed by the avalanche of information about different ways to love.She says a key to relationship success – no matter what type of relationship – is compersion, a word used in poly communities for feeling joy at your partner’s happiness.Decriminalising bigamy?A paper in published in The University of Queensland Law Journal this month outlined how Australia could legalise polygamy in a secular way.The University of Adelaide PhD candidate Michail Ivanov proposed that could happen by maintaining the law that a marriage be between two people, but abolishing bigamy as a crime.“The practice of polygamy clashes with traditional Christian values, which have underpinned much of Australia’s marriage laws. But in a country with no state religion, we should question how much weight we place on that factor,” Ivanov says.“If Australia were to legalise polygamy in the way I propose, it would be the first society to do so in a manner not led or motivated by religious beliefs.” ...
We spoke with experts and a married mother of four practicing polyamory, who explain that healthy communication prevents confusion for children.Seeing parents date, whatever the relationship style, can be perplexing. Cassandra Raphael, MD, MPH, board-certified child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist, recommends not introducing any partner to a child unless they’re going to be a family fixture. “It’s best to introduce a new grown-up when you are confident that that grown-up is going to be around for quite a while,” she shares. “The stability and attachment that children have with their grown-ups can be compromised in [the] future if in their early relationships, they feel like the relationship to grown-ups are kind of fleeting.”Polyamory should also be discussed in an age and developmentally appropriate manner, according to mental health professionals like Stacey Younge, a licensed clinical social worker behind the practice Sixth Street Wellness. “The conversation you’re going to have with a 5-year-old is going to be very different than the conversation you’re going to have with a 9-year-old than you’re going to have with a 15-year-old,” she says.Media can help with this. The children’s book A Color Named Love introduces little readers to polyamorous family dynamics. Deidre Morgan, LCSW, who specializes in therapeutic support of children, also recommends you avoid pretending that your new partner is just a platonic friend if behavior indicates otherwise. She also suggests resisting the urge to “code the conversation” by identifying the partner as something they’re not. According to Morgan, “It almost can feel like they’ve been betrayed or lied to.” Mainstream culture can embed ideas into children before topics are broached at home. Therefore, it may not be much of a shock to open up about polyamory with your children. “Kids know more than what we give them credit for,” says Morgan. “They pay attention.”“We have seen these relationships growing up. That wasn’t just mom’s best friend, that was her lover,” Johnson says of the prevalence of using codified language as parents when sharing about one’s private life.“We do have to be very careful as well because our children have to go out into this world and have connections with people who may not operate in the same space as your family. I think that is why oftentimes people have these codified languages or have tried to figure out ways to not to expose the truth, even if they can trust that their child could handle it.”
Imagine walking into a city council meeting and watching as elected officials unanimously vote to protect people like us from discrimination. Imagine folks from all walks of life gathering in public parks and community centers from Lisbon to Los Angeles to celebrate their relationships openly. These scenes ... unfolded across the US and around the world just last year.As we celebrate OPEN's third anniversary, I'm reflecting on moments like these, when our community's vision for a more accepting world becomes reality. The path ahead is filled with even more possibility:
Envision three parents all having their names on their child's birth certificate, their co-parenting arrangement legally recognized.
See a world where employers and insurers recognize multiple committed partners without requiring legal marriage.
Imagine no longer having to hide or explain your non-monogamous relationships at a family gathering, because these relationships are widely understood and accepted.
See yourself as part of the movement making this happen, one city, one workplace, one conversation at a time.To get there, we need strong organizations supporting a powerful movement:
• We need organizing capacity to build local power in communities across the country.
• We need communication capacity to ensure our stories and perspectives are represented in public discourse.
• We need wider research to better understand our communities, identities, and experiences.
• We need coalition-building to connect our work with other movements fighting for justice and liberation.
Would you consider making your first gift today to be part of this story? Whether you can give $5, $50, or more, you'll be joining a community of hundreds of supporters who are chipping in to help this movement grow.
On a personal note: Three years ago, I took a leap of faith, walking away from a stable job (and health insurance!) to launch OPEN. It hasn't always been easy! But witnessing both the public victories and the quieter, personal stories of impact has made every difficult day worthwhile.
![]()
Somerville City Councilor-at-Large Willie Burnley Jr. at Diesel Cafe.
(John Tlumacki/Globe Staff)By Kara Baskin...Amid a skyrocketing housing market and loneliness becoming a public health epidemic, aspiring buyers are looking beyond the traditional nuclear family to find new financial and social solutions to homeownership.At the end of April, Harvard Law School plans to release a landmark guidebook called “How to Buy Property with Chosen Family,” which addresses how to approach traditional institutions such as banks and real estate agencies as a nontraditional unit. The first-of-its-kind primer, which will be published by the school’s LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic, is for people trying to buy a home with friends or anyone hoping to live in a nonstandard structure.The arrangement is often associated with polyamory, but the clinic emphasizes that the guide can apply to a group of friends, multiple families, or anybody who wants to break into the housing market but doesn’t have the desire or resources to go it alone. The guide offers strategies such as creating a tenancy in common agreement or an LLC, which offers ownership agreements and stipulates financial consequences in case a living arrangement goes south.“Among a lot of people I know, this is the main way that they see themselves being able to [buy] — and it also seems like a much better idea than becoming isolated in your own little suburban enclave without access to community,” said Samara Trilling, a third-year Harvard Law student who coauthored the guidebook in collaboration with the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC).The guide comes at the right time, Trilling said, as more people simply crave community and homeownership. The structure — romantic or platonic — makes financial sense, and the guide’s release coincides with a shift in household demographics. ...“Many people are not in a nuclear family. ... If that’s not actually reflecting our constituents, how do we build in pathways toward generational wealth that actually can meet people where they’re at?” said Kimberly Rhoten, a PLAC cofounder.Somerville is a groundbreaking example. ... “We’ve heard from people who moved to our community specifically because of these [2023] laws and because of the domestic partnership ordinance that passed in 2020,” said Willie Burnley Jr., a Somerville city councilor-at-large and mayoral candidate who is polyamorous and rents his home with platonic roommates.Heath Schechinger, another PLAC cofounder... is hopeful that laws and housing models will catch up to prospective homeowners’ financial and social realities.“An increasing number of people are living with their chosen family: buying homes with friends or partners, or building family through shared values rather than marriage. The future of family isn’t about form. It’s about function — and who you build your life with.”
Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”
![]() |
It's this tough. "You've lived your life — go to the front!" Army recruiting pamphlets for oldsters at a kiosk in a train station. |
![]() |
Women defenders on our world's eastern front |
Whenever people write to my office [asking why we are supporting Ukraine,] I answer, 'Google Sudetenland, 1938.' We could have stopped a murderous dictator who was bent on geographic expansion…at a relatively low cost. The result of not doing so was 55 million deaths.
Labels: "#PolyamoryNews, #polyactivism, #PolyamoryintheNews, #PolyamoryResearch, #polyfamilies, #PolyFamily, #PolyOnTV, #symbiosexuality, polyfamilies, research, TV