Polyamory in the News!
. . . by Alan M.



November 23, 2022

The vote for a new polyamory flag is done, and we have a winner.


A total of 30,827 people voted on PolyamProud's four finalist designs for a new polyamory flag, and the winner is in. It's the tricolor-and-heart design that was submitted by, we now learn, Red Howell.


Larger, high-res version. The download page, with different versions. The color values

Howell, a young British designer, has put it in the public domain. Here's his explanation of it:


The intention behind this design was to create a simple, bold tricolor, with a contemporary approach to traditional vexillological (relating to the study of flags) elements from the original “Pi” flag. 

It takes the best of the original flag, including its color symbolism, and improves on those elements of the Pi flag which alienated viewers.

A white chevron flows outward to depict the growth and possibility of the non-monogamous community. It sits asymmetrically on the flag to reflect the non-traditional style of polyamorous relationships. 

The heart reminds us that love in all forms is the core of [ethical] non-monogamy.

As in the original polyamory flag: 

Red stands for love and attraction.

Blue stands for openness and honesty.

However, this redesign also makes thoughtful alterations:

Gold represents the energy and perseverance of those in the non-monogamous community.

Purple to represent a united non-monogamous community.


So there we have it, after two years. I like it. It was my own first choice of the four finalists. It's kind of growing on me.

No one pretends this project was in any way official. The idea of the PolyamProud folks was to come up with catchy, meaningful, professional-quality alternatives to the much disliked Pi flag from 1995, then put them to a broad vote by the community. Of the dozens of new polyamory flags that people have created in the last decade, none have yet emerged from the pack. The 11-member group took the initiative to collect flag designs that were in the public domain, and to recruit poly designers and flag buffs to create more. They recruited a globally representative committee to make a first cut, and presented the four finalist designs for a 22-day public vote.

Criticisms of the process included the lack of finalist designs displaying the infinity heart, our best-known symbol, and the fact that the selection committee presented only four finalists. Kristian of PolyamProud addressed these issues in my previous post, and Dee Morgan has copied that discussion to the PolyamProud blogsite.

I bet we'll see a lot more of the tricolor-and-heart in the next few years; within hours, PolyamProud's Instagram announcement of the winner had over 18,000 likes.

Will it ever become as widely known, and therefore as powerful and useful, as the rainbow Gay Pride Flag, the Trans Pride Flag, and others have become in their communities? Could happen... if people choose to use it.
 
_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________

[Permalink]



November 22, 2022

Today is Polyamory Day! Let's share it out.


Reasons to be Cheerful department: Today (Wednesday November 23) is Polyamory Day, whose origins are explained below.

But first, please share out the pic below, or one of the others with links further on, across your social and let's get this going, even bigger than last year. For polyamory visibility and recognition.

Click for full size and resolution.
Get it in SpanishFrenchGermanPortugueseDutch, or Italian

The backstory:

For years people floated ideas for an appropriate Polyamory Day, but nothing happened. Then in 2017 the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) took the initiative by declaring, with a press release, that November 23 would be National Polyamory Day in Canada, and the idea spread. In 2018 they repeated the announcement for not just Canada but worldwide. It spread further in the next several years, with other activists picking it up and running with it. By 2019 it was going around in French, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Dutch, and Italian. 

Why November 23?
 This is the day when, in 2011, a British Columbia Supreme Court judge ruled that Canada's anti-polygamy law does not apply to modern polyamorists, if they do not try to make a group relationship a formally sanctioned group marriage (polygamy). Previously, according to the law, three or more people merely living together in one dwelling "conjugally" could be sentenced to five years in prison, although no prosecution had been brought for many decades. The CPAA worked to make the favorable court decision happen.

But eleven years later the origin is fading into history, while the day is becoming a thing worldwide. Let's make this happen!

----------------------------------------

Here's from the press release CPAA just put out:



Wednesday, November 23, 2022, is Polyamory Day – a day celebrated every year around the world by people who consider themselves to be polyamorous, who are in polyamorous relationship(s), or who support polyamory as a valid relationship orientation or choice. On November 23rd, we ask: If you agree that polyamorous people are entitled to the same relationship rights, privileges, and governmental accommodation as others, please share a Polyamory Day image or meme on your social media, mailing lists, and blogs.  You can use an existing image or create a new one. Find Polyamory Day images by searching #polyamoryday on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or TikTok. New Polyamory Day images will be released via our social media on or before November 23.

For more information, visit http://polyadvocacy.ca/polyamory-day-faq


----------------------------------------


Another image:


Click for hi-res.


























More shareable images are in the Gallery of the new site polyamoryday.com.


----------------------------------------


And while we're at it, here's a list of other more-or-less settled recognition days that are poly related. 

_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________

[Permalink]



November 18, 2022

Voting for a new polyamory flag passes 28,000. New book on poly history, a multi-relationshipping workbook...


●  PolyamProud's vote for a new polyamory flag is in progress and will close this Tuesday the 22nd. The project grew from widespread dissatisfaction with the old flag, the one from 1995 with the letter π.  Go vote. They've received 28,000 votes so far. The winner will be announced this Wednesday the 23rd, Polyamory Day.
  
Gripes arise: None of the four finalists up for the vote uses the infinity heart, which disappointed me because that's the only widely recognized symbol we currently have. A big complaint about the old flag has been its undecipherable meaning. And why are we choosing among only four candidates instead of, say, the top 10 or 15? The ranked-choice voting setup would work fine for that. But you'll never please everyone, me included.

Update: I asked Kristian of PolyamProud about my gripes above, which commenters on the flag-vote site have also raised, and he replied at length. Much of the finalist selection was due to the input of people from around the world, not just the Americans and other westerners in the project. Read his whole reply in Footnote 1 below. 

To recap: This project has been in the works for two years, as described here previously and at PolyamProud. A group of volunteers took the initiative to announce the project worldwide, collect and recruit flag submissions, and do a first pass through a panel of graphic designers, vexillologists (flag buffs), and poly activists. Designs that made it that far went to a committee of interested poly people "with a history of activism, advocacy, or other labor," recruited globally rather than only from the West, to make a cut of finalists. Those are what you're voting on. You rank them from 1 to 4 for ranked-choice voting.

No one pretends the winning flag will be "official," so don't get bent out of shape about that. People will keep using whatever polyamory flag they like; more than a dozen are in use. The project's hope has been to find something that will inspire many people to coalesce and use it, so that the world will finally come to know what it is and what it means. The inspiration was the rainbow Pride Flag and what it has done to boost LGBT recognition worldwide.


●  Speaking of flags, the LGBTQIA+ staff community at Microsoft Corp. recently created an all identities flag:

The all identities flag is open source. High-res version.

I like it! It's brilliant and bold, combining an unwieldy collection of 40 flags into something with unity and pizzazz. One of our many polyamory flags is in it. The infinity heart gives it away.


●  In other news, just published is Glen W. Olson's and Terry Lee Brussel-Rogers' history of the early polyamory movement: Fifty Years of Polyamory in America: A Guided Tour of a Growing Movement (Rowman & Littlefield). 

The book is slim at 160 pages. Much of it is about the modern movement's early development from 1968 through 1994, history that is receding from living memories into myth and legend. But that was when many of the current movement's core ideas, ideals, and language took their shape. I just ordered a copy and will review it.

Meanwhile, the publisher's blurb calls it


an exploration of two generations of Americans, the people and the organizations they founded, what they have chosen to do, and how it has changed their lives and affected the culture as a whole.

...We explore the history of the polyamory movement: from clinical definitions and attempts at psychiatric treatment, to the advent of advocacy groups in the 1960s and ’70s, to contemporary practitioners and the future of the movement.


At the Amazon link above, click the Look Inside for the table of contents and the first chapter. Looks good so far.
 

●  Polyamory lurched into the news with the spectacular collapse of the FTX crypto-currency corporation and its young founder Sam Bankman-Fried, a multi-billionaire until a few days ago. His top staff were said to be all trading sex partners, and although media stories referred to this as polyamory, it sounded more like a chaotic free-for-all.

But not even that is true, claims their in-house psychiatrist. Below is from Futurism.com (Nov. 16). Click the links for more, especially the New York Times interview. 


In spite of rumors of workplace polyamory, it appears that the psychiatrist charged with being FTX's in-house sex therapist didn't think the people involved in the now-collapsed crypto exchange were getting it on quite enough.

In a surprising interview with the New York Times, psychiatrist George K. Lerner said he'd known Sam Bankman-Fried, the exchange's disgraced wunderkind founder, for years before he took up a post as the firm's company "coach." For his part, he denies the claim that the CEO or anyone else in the company's orbit in the Bahamas was getting up to anything all that freaky.

"It’s a pretty tame place,” Lerner told the Times. "The higher-ups, they mostly played chess and board games. There was no partying. They were undersexed, if anything."


Update: But other other stories from inside the FTX core group paint a dark picture of poly gone truly awful-boss, rich-people bad. In the Guardian: Polyamory, penthouses and plenty of loans: inside the crazy world of FTX (Nov. 19):


...Take [FTX's] fourth major player, Caroline Ellison. Bankman-Fried’s sometime girlfriend, the 28-year-old was head of trading at Alameda before being promoted to jointly run the hedge fund in summer 2021, and was left in sole charge this year.... 

In posts on her account, since deleted, she wrote about her understanding of traditional finance (“it’s very unlikely for you to actually lose all your money”)... and her exploration of polyamory. “When I first started my first foray into poly, I thought of it as a radical break from my trad past,” she wrote in 2020, “but tbh, I’ve come to decide the only acceptable style of poly is best characterised as something like ‘imperial Chinese harem’. None of this non-hierarchical bullshit. Everyone should have a ranking of their partners, people should know where they fall on the ranking, and there should be vicious power struggles for the ranks.”


So the richer people get, the worse they become? This wild drama of incredible hubris and incompetency, which turned an estimated one million investors' money worthless overnight, goes down in history as one more argument for no billionaires. 


● Sarah Youngblood Gregory is getting good press this week for her Polyamory Workbook just out. From the publisher's description:


Successfully navigate nonmonogamous relationships with this practical workbook filled with activities, journal prompts, interviews, and more activities.... Helps you determine what you really want when it comes to your life, your relationships, and the community you build — and how to get it.

...This workbook focuses on the foundational knowledge everyone interested in or already practicing polyamory should know, including:
–  Types of nonmonogamy
–  Communication styles
–  Boundary setting
–  Consent
–  Metamours and jealousy
–  Pitfalls and red flags
–  Breakups



Teen Vogue prints an excerpt: The Polyamory Workbook: How I Discovered Nonmonogamy (Nov. 15):


Graphic of three smiling women snuggling on a couch reading.
Getty

I believe in love. I believe the best people love love and love to give love. ... But knowing how to love, to offer it up, is harder.

The Western world ... is by and large a sex-negative culture not just distrustful of, but destructive toward, most love that isn’t tidy, white, monogamous, cisgender, and heterosexual. But I feel a special, different kind of love when I share my strange, full life with others, either physically or through the page.

...When I was 16, and just barely scratching the surface of the queer desire I’d been largely ignoring since childhood, I declared quietly, and only to myself, that I’d never be in a monogamous relationship. I barely had the language to define myself in contrast to monogamy, let alone articulate what I now know about polyamory, relationship anarchy, and relationships based in love and agency. I stuck only with what I could imagine: “not monogamous.”

I held on to this knowledge tightly, secretively. ...



And here's the founder of Shrimp Teeth interviewing Gregory at PopSugar: Polyamory Isn't About Endless, Hot Sex — It's About Community (Nov. 15). If you remember nothing else from here, please remember that? 


--------------------------------------

1.  Kristian's reply to my flag-project gripes.

Sure!  Thanks for these great questions.

Why did only new, unknown flags make it to the finals, when several are currently in use and perhaps widely liked?
We were lucky to receive dozens of submissions and also to have found through our research, more dozens of existing designs. It felt important to give an opportunity to beautifully made, thoughtful flags that would otherwise have never been noticed. That said, several existing or well-known flags were involved in the multi-tiered selection process but eliminated for 1) copyright issues (they didn't belong to the public domain), or 2) lack of support from either our advisors and/or the committee (for example, the green-and-blue-banded design by Molly Makes Things made it through the advisory round and into the committee review, but it came out of their initial review among the least preferred options. One committee member motioned for a second decision on that particular design, in case it had been passed over for its colors instead of its symbolism, but it turned out that the symbolism was more of the issue. Which leads us to your next question:

Why do none have the infinity heart, our only well-known symbol?
There are a few reasons for this—we've been critical of the infinity heart in the past. Design-wise, its interlocking curves create messy and unwieldy negative space, especially when placed atop a striped background where the division between the bands of color dissects the symbol at odd intervals, creating a rather erratic image. Additionally, we've received feedback from artists, makers, and crafters who've found adding a symbol, especially a complex symbol like the infinity heart, makes it more challenging to reproduce images of designs that employ them. The harder the thing is to reproduce, the less it will be reproduced. That's the opposite of what we're looking for when it comes to community pride flags.  

In terms of its symbolism, there were diverse opinions among the committee, but a couple of the members offered this on their decision not to include it:

"To me, the infinity heart calls upon old romantic stereotypes upholding love and relationships as an infinite force, leading to unrealistic expectations both from oneself and our partners. Love isn't infinite, our time, patience, and the amount of affection we can give is limited, and as a movement that's rethinking the way we relate to each other we have to be realistic, honest and responsible with our limits and the limits of our partners, because if we aren't well ourselves we won't be able to be there for the people we love."
   - Jacques Treviño

“I personally think the idea of infinity+heart only represents that love can be infinite (in many ways) and does not necessarily imply unrealistic expectations of time and emotional bandwidth/resources also being infinite. 
However, I respect the process we arrived at not including it- the majority of this diverse committee had voted against it (5 vs 2) and so ideally we should stick with the committee's decision.”
   - Basit Manham 

The committee also selected two designs which were created with space to accommodate additional symbols of the user's liking. Similar examples of this occurring out in the world are the flags of Poland and Peru, which in some cases appear with a crest and in some cases appear without a crest, but are at all times recognized as the flags of Poland and Peru, crest or not. 

Regarding obscurity or confusion: we strongly disagree. The obscurity of the Pi flag is in part because Pi has many other (and stronger) cultural associations to the world at large, among them engineering or geometry. These designs, because they're new, don't have any associations at all. This is the case with any new flag, logo, symbol, icon intending to depict an abstract idea. For example, when it was first created, there was nothing inherently French about their blue, white, and red tricolor. Now, it is an iconic symbol of the country. The association came after the flag. We expect that will be the case here as well. 

Finally, it was always the hope of this project to produce something new—to move away from existing symbolism on the basis that no existing flag had taken a solid hold in the community to this point. That's not to say we don't appreciate the value of the infinity heart for polyamorous people (in particular those in Europe, it would seem based on where that critism is largely coming from). The infinity heart may well continue to have stronger and stronger associations with polyamory among the world at large—but that doesn't mean it must exist on the flag. We encourage everyone to use the symbols and flags that feel comfortable and inspiring to them. 

Why only four finalists?
From the beginning of this project, one of the primary drivers was the notion that polyamory has existed for far longer and is made up of far more people than the caucasian group in which it has in recent decades become more popular. It felt, therefore, principally important to prioritize voices of those with traditionally less decision-making power in the process of creating a new banner for our community. 

That's why we wanted a committee of diverse representatives to narrow the field of options first before putting them to a community-wide vote. The majority of voters was likely going to be english-speaking because, despite doing our best to provide translations of our plan in a variety of languages and our efforts to reach as many varied segments of the global polyamorous community, the creators of polyamproud are ourselves english-speaking. So, the majority of our content would be in English and accordingly capture a primarily english-speaking audience, whether or not that's actually reflective of the global demographics of polyamorous people. 

We knew from the jump that a vote with 10 or more flags would split the decision too much—that we might end up with a flag that was the majority of people's 4th or 5th choice. So, we always planned for the vote to include "more than two and less than seven" designs. After the initial advisory round, the committee saw 10 designs, and chose among themselves to only include those they thought were the best four, rather than including designs they didn't believe strongly simply for the sake of variety for voters. 

We considered using a bracket-style system and had a series of votes, but the demographics of those voters and number of votes would be inconsistent at each step. A single vote would maximize engagement and ensure a consistent voter base throughout. That's why we chose to hold only a single vote on a small group of designs which had been pre-selected by people whose voices were likely to have been drowned out by white polyamorous people in the vote. 

Overall statement:
Flags don't become beacons of a community overnight. That takes time, use, and persistence. We have been so proud of the engagement, excitement, and massive response from the community. With nearly 30,000 people having weighed in on these designs, we see this vote as a way to jump-start adoption of a new standard for the polyamorous community. We believe in the ability of each of these designs to become that beacon over the next decade. 

------------------------------------------------------

And to repeat...

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many progressive movements become irrelevant and die out by failing to scan the wider world correctly and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Some increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside their worldview, we expose its incompleteness. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

The Russian family-cartoon series Masyanya
turned dissident. Watch. The cartoonist has fled.
Update: a brilliant sequel of turnabout, and a
message of empathy in wartime. 
 
Such a society is only possible where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

People, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, abuse of police power, or, eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, this site has received more pagereads from Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For now, you can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of organizations, or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, a project of an old friend of my wife. (Story)

----------------------------------

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, this is the most consequential war of our lifetimes.

The coming times are going to require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Play thisAnother version, on the streets of Kherson after its liberation November 11. More? Just some guys in Kharkiv (our Pizza for Ukraine town) helping to hold onto a free and open society, a shrinking thing in the world. The tossed grenade seems to have saved them. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and for us, because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they're doing it for us too. They are correct.  The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. It's likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And the country had quite a history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — until the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that.

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic (Sept. 7),   


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trusthromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through as well as they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine are generally traditional, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. More than 40,000 women volunteers reportedly serve all roles in the armed forces, including as combat officers, platoon leadersartillery gunners, tankers, and snipers. LGBT folx in the armed forces openly wear symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, whereas in Russia it can be a crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin.

They will require our long-continued support. 

_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________


[Permalink]



November 7, 2022

A spate of first-person polyamory stories in the media. Two more books. And, VOTE!




First: One thing is more important right now than anything else. VOTE! Don't let anything stop you.

If you're reading this site, you have at least one very personal reason why.

We polyfolks are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Increasingly powerful people call us a threat to society that must be dealt with: part of the whole mix of sex and relationship non-normals who should be marginalized and stripped of rights. Yes, read that link.

This is because by living successfully outside of their worldview, we expose its incompleteness. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures without fear, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts (even in libraries!) and to speak of what they know.

People and communities outside the norm infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States. It's no exaggeration; a world fascist trend is building. But tomorrow, you get a vote on that. Use it, or don't complain later.

-------------------------------

The last week or so brought a slew of first-person polyamory stories in the media.

●  Yes, be brave. Liliana Bakhtiari, that nonbinary queer poly Iranian-born Atlanta city councilor who made news with her triad a month ago, has written a "My Turn" column in Newsweek: 'I'm a Non-Monogamous American Politician' (Oct. 28). 


To come out publicly as non-monogamous as an elected official—especially a queer, brown, non-binary, Muslim elected official in the South—is not a small thing. I was elected to the Atlanta City Council in December 2021. My partners, Kris and Sarah, and I spent almost a year planning how we would come out before we did so in September 2022.

...We are a triad. Everyone has permission to see other people if they would like, but that's not something that any of us are currently doing. This is a family, so there has to be a lot of communication around that because we've worked really hard to build what we have.

On vacation.
Kris and Sarah are both the best partners you could ask for. I enjoy our relationship because I get to live with and love my two best friends. We can do everything from a cross-country road trip to sitting at home in complete silence, in our pajamas, watching Schitts Creek, and be completely happy.

I also love that the three of us are very ambitious in our own ways and balance each other out really well. They make me a better person, and make me more equipped to do the work that I want to do.

When the three of us first went into the relationship, we didn't know what was going to happen. But when we realized we had the depth, the substance, the connection, for us to be a family and to build a life together, that's when we started making plans to come out.

Being non-monogamous as a politician

We came out to our friends, family and our immediate circles. But for almost two years, I did not go public with my relationship with Sarah. We wanted to be intentional about the story and how we came out. Kris and I didn't want Sarah to get hurt.

It wasn't easy, and it wasn't fun. It took some getting used to, especially for Sarah. At political events, I would introduce them as Kris and Sarah, and it was hard not being able to say who Sarah was. ... It's a hard thing to feel like you're devaluing someone you love in the public eye. ... 

Kris and I wanted to come out because we felt we had found the person with whom we were going to spend the rest of our lives. We want to have children, too—Sarah is planning on carrying, and we also want to adopt.

We also wanted people to know about our relationship because we feel we have nothing to be ashamed of. We're super proud of our relationship. It's a completely valid way of living: it's loving, it takes a village to raise a child anyway, and it is very possible to be in love with more than one person. We want to de-stigmatize non-monogamy for other people as well. Whether you recognize it or not, many people are involved in non-monogamous relationships. It has been a practice for thousands of years....

Life after "coming out"

We "came out" in an article with NBC, in September, 2022. On that day, I feel like everything played out exactly as it needed to. I honestly couldn't be happier with how it happened.

I've since received so many text messages, emails, social media messages and comments. A lot of people have said they had to move out of Georgia in order to practice their polyamorous or non-monogamous relationships, and they were really glad to see the public representation.

...My colleagues and everybody at the district and City Hall have been super supportive. Atlanta is very different from rural parts of Georgia. The response here has been great. If somebody has an issue, they're not saying anything!

Before we came out, I remember acquaintances saying, "You're never going to be able to come out," and I was like, "Just watch me." ...





Sage Agee and child.
By Sage Agee

Since I was young, crushes have often developed between me and my friends, and I always found it hard to discern the line between platonic and romantic feelings. ... 

In 2016, I met the person that would eventually become my coparent. I brought up non-monogamy a number of times to him, and he was curious to try it but needed more time to build trust and get comfortable with the idea. I thought that was a fair request and wasn't fully convinced that I was ready for it, either. So I kept my interest in polyamory where it had lived the majority of my adult life — buried. 

Occasionally, we would flirt with another couple or single person together and fantasize what it would be like to have sex with them. It was exciting when those moments came, but when we would start to consider developing an actual relationship with someone else, the communication would break down and insecurities would stop us from bringing a third person into our relationship. 

Then, in March 2020, we were living in a small studio apartment when the pandemic lockdown hit. The same week we began working from home together, I took a pregnancy test — and it was positive. Over the next two years, our life circumstances changed drastically. We ended up moving into a small farmhouse in a rural town, and I quit my nonprofit job to stay home with our baby full time. 

...I daydreamed of having a network of care for both my child and myself that monogamy and the nuclear-family model couldn't offer. I knew I wanted different partners who could fulfill different needs, instead of putting all my expectations onto one person and fighting for support. 

So, like many neurodivergent people, I did an endless amount of research. I compiled a document filled with resources, testimonies, frequently asked questions, and even relevant terminology that might make my desires more understandable. In a moment of bravery, I emailed it to my partner.

To my surprise, he agreed that it sounded exciting and we decided to try it out slowly. ...



●  In the New York Times Style section's "Modern Love" department, a heartfelt tale of summer love. A Throuple’s Tricky Geometry (Oct. 28) Did it end well? That's a judgment call. The writer seems to think so.


In a couple, a straight line connects two points. With three people in a relationship, many more configurations emerge. 

Brian Rea / NYT
By Evan Sterrett

A queen-size bed can sleep two adult men comfortably. It can fit three if you don’t mind cuddling — or waking up to strange noises in the dark.

One early July morning, I opened my eyes to my boyfriend making out with the guy who had been living with us for the past month. Not really a fan of sex before tooth-brushing, I smiled, mumbled “hot” and turned over.

This had become our sleeping arrangement that summer: my boyfriend, our new lover and me. Add our Chihuahua at the foot of the bed and it was a tight squeeze. It’s a miracle we weren’t sleep deprived. In fact, we felt the opposite. After six turbulent years together, my boyfriend and I were falling in love all over again. Not with each other, exactly, but with this Third. ...

Long before meeting the Third, our relationship had downgraded into reruns of the same drama, our fights rehearsed through years of repetition. But now we had a guest star. With a new script in our hands, we wondered, could this be our comeback?

...It was a sweaty June day and we were at a pool party for the gay dating app I work for. ... My co-worker introduced me to his friend.... I thought there was something special about the way he held my gaze. Well that, and he was adorable. My boyfriend agreed. That night, he came home with us.

...Before long, he was spending every night with us. My boyfriend would drive him to his internship in the mornings and we would reunite in the evenings for dinner. On the weekends, we would take spin classes together, swim in the Pacific, eat ice cream, dance at warehouse parties. With all his youthful energy and optimism, the Third had resuscitated our joie de vivre. This was our summer of love.

The rules were loosely defined, which is to say, there were none. My boyfriend and I didn’t discuss what was happening, other than a breathless, “Isn’t this incredible?” We knew the Third’s internship would end in August regardless, so why fret? There was no time to waste.

In mid-July, I realized we were falling in love. ...We were at a tapas restaurant downtown and the Third was telling a story from his childhood. I looked over to see my boyfriend smiling and staring intently at him. His expression was so smitten that for a moment I wanted to smack his grin away, thinking, “You don’t look at me like that anymore.” But then I blinked and realized that I was wearing the same, doofy expression.

...The geometry of a throuple is complex. With a couple, there’s only a straight line connecting two dots. But introduce a third point, and so many more possibilities emerge — only one of which is an equilateral triangle.

Although the Third slept between us in bed, sat across from us at dinner and walked between us holding both of our hands, the angles in our throuple kept shifting.

-------------------------------

...Gradually, our conflicts from seasons past started to replay themselves. By early August, our fighting escalated so much that we had to take things outside one night. “We’re embarrassing ourselves,” I said in a hiss. My boyfriend paced the sidewalk, steaming with rage, while I badgered him with questions. The nighttime dog walkers had stopped to stare by the time my boyfriend said, “He makes me feel the way you used to!”

It was one of those ugly sentences that slips out during a fight and shocks both parties with its precision. We both knew it was true, and I understood it completely because I felt the same way.

Summer ended. It was time for the Third to fly home. ... 

The Third brought a light into the dark, dusty room of our relationship. That light woke us up, energized us, made us vulnerable again. But it also illuminated some boxes we had tried, for years, to keep tucked away. Boxes stuffed so full of resentments that they would make even a hoarder blush. Before the throuple, we could ignore our issues, file them away. But once we had a witness, we could no longer deny the evidence. ...





By Aliyah Moore

When my ex first floated the idea of polyamory to me, I didn’t know how to feel. Was I not enough for her? Was she not as committed to the relationship as I was? What would other people think, and how would I explain it to them?

Savannah Ruedy
I’ve struggled with jealousy before. We all have, especially when it comes to the people we love. Polyamory — the practice of having multiple consensual romantic partners — doesn’t make jealousy any easier to deal with, and that’s not the only emotion I’ve had to juggle in my non-monogamous relationships. 

Still, I had to admit that part of me had feelings for a friend of ours that I didn’t want to miss out on. It started with me and her, but I wanted him in my life too -- as more than a friend -- and so did she. So I decided to give it a shot.

When I started practicing polyamory, I wasn’t sure what it was supposed to be like. I mean, one in five Americans have at least tried it, so there has to be some kind of formula or typical setup, right? Well… sort of. Every relationship is so different that there isn’t a one-size-fits-all picture of polyamory. For me, it was shaped by my sexuality, emotional needs, and even race. 

A poly relationship isn’t just about sex. It’s about breaking the perspective that a lifelong romantic bond can only exist exclusively between two people. Instead of having a deep emotional and sexual connection with one person, I had it with two. 

We all had ground rules about using protection outside our triangle, making time for each other, and who was or was not okay to sleep with. With some trial and error, we forged a beautiful relationship that lasted nearly three years. 

Usually, the worst part of polyamory wasn’t my relationship with my partners — it was how other people viewed and reacted to it. People (especially men) seemed to think that being polyamorous meant I was down to sleep with them all the time, and that my girlfriend and I wanted a threesome. Others made comments about how lucky our boyfriend was to be dating two girls at once, effectively reducing us to his sexual playthings with their words.

...I never introduced them to my family. Maybe if I had it would have helped normalize things, but I didn’t think they were ever going to get past the perception that a hypersexual Black man had tricked me into being his glorified sidepiece. 

My Polyamory “Rules”

There’s no one-size-fits-all way to make a poly relationship work, but there are ways to keep it healthy. 

1. The first step is to think about what you want. Polyamory isn’t for everyone, and that’s okay. ... If you’re sure polyamory is for you, then do your research. ... Experienced poly people can warn you about common issues or answer common questions. 

2. Every relationship needs boundaries. You and your partner(s) will need to make some ground rules about sex and emotional connection. ...

3. Manage your expectations. Some people expect polyamory to solve the problems in their existing relationships, but this isn’t usually the case. You and your partner(s) still need to communicate, devote time to each other, and nurture your emotional bonds.

4. Talk about everything!  ...

5. Don’t be afraid to adapt. For many of us, polyamory is uncharted territory. The rules you set at the beginning of the relationship might not work as you and your partner(s) grow and have more experiences. If you need to change the rules, that’s okay. It’s always better to talk about the relationship than to suffer in silence or violate the emotional bond.
 
6. Make time for your partner(s). ...

7. Be respectful toward everyone involved. ...

8. You should practice safe sex outside your relationship. ...

9. Respect yourself and your feelings. If you feel like you’re being edged out by other partners, you need to say something. If nothing changes, then it might be time to move on from the relationship. 

10. All in all, a poly relationship can be whatever you and your partner(s) want it to be. It can be an exclusive emotional bond between more than two people, or any number of people that are open to sexual encounters outside their relationship. 

Negative feelings are unavoidable, but they don’t define polyamory any more than they define monogamy. If you’re honest with yourself and you’re honest with your partner(s), you can find a way to make it work.



● Dedeker Winston of the big, successful Multiamory podcast has a new book coming out: Multiamory: Essential Tools for Modern Relationships. It's due in March. This is her second book; the first was The Smart Girl's Guide to Polyamory (2017). 

In what looks like the start of the new book's publicity rush, the Daily Mail online ran a long, positive story about Winston and her partners: Polyamorous woman, 34, who was once in a 'quad' with two boyfriends and a girlfriend now hosts a podcast on non-monogamy... (October 8).


396-episode podcast team: Dedeker (left), Emily, Jase





By William Holmes

A polyamorous woman who was once part of a love 'quad' has revealed she used to think polyamory was just for 'sex addicts' as a result of her religious upbringing.

Dedeker Winston, 35, from Seattle, hosts the Multiamory Podcast with her former lover and her current partner. But before embracing open relationships 10 years ago, she was raised in a conservative household that taught her trysts should be monogamous.

She said: 'I was raised in a very conservative, evangelical environment and therefore inherited certain ideas about sex and relationships. It was extremely monogamy and marriage focused.' 

She said: 'When I got into high school and first explored relationships, I found myself being attracted to more than one person very early on. At that time, no one ever told me it's normal a thing that can happen. ...When I finally got introduced to the term 'polyamory', it blew my mind.

...She now hosts her podcast with her ex-partner Emily Matlack, 34, and her current partner Jase Lindgren, with whom she was once in a 'quad', which also included her once-monogamous ex-boyfriend.

'We were a quad together,' she added. 'My partner that I was living with found Emily on a dating site. I then separately matched with Jase, who at the time was Emily's partner and they were living with each other. 

'Emily and I hit it off and we essentially became a four-strong relationship which was fantastic. We discussed creating a podcast to talk about our experiences as we were so sick of answering everyone's questions. ... 'We want to be giving people accurate, evidence-based advice and suggestions on how to make any and all relationships better. It's a labour of love.'

The quad itself broke up, but Dedeker, Emily and Jase continued to host the Multiamory podcast together, for which they record a new episode every week. 

...'Fast forward to today, Jase and I are still together and we both date other people. Emily has been in a monogamous relationship for the past seven years. Our experiences have made the podcast more relatable for the listeners.

'We can create our own scripts for any and all relationships. It's not just about sexual relationships but also friendships and business relationships. Our bond is far more robust and healthier as a result. We are an emotional triad that is co-parenting a podcast baby.'

'My first experience practicing polyamory failed spectacularly,' she said. 'It was so painful and difficult, but I still came away thinking this is who I'm meant to be. This made me want to reduce the shame and stigma and help more people to feel more at ease and empowered within themselves.'

Branching into new ventures, the podcast hosts are releasing a book titled Multiamory: Essential Tools for a Modern Relationships. Due for release on March 14, 2023, it is a communication guide for people in both monogamous and polyamorous partnerships.


The Daily Mail also made a startling claim:


A human's desire for many intimate relationships depends on the size of the neocortex in the brain, the professor [Oxford's Robin I. M. Dunbar, of Dunbar's number fame] says -- those in polyamorous circles tend to be larger as a consequence.


I could not find any such research. So I wrote to Dunbar himself. He immediately replied that he has never studied human neocortex size vs. polyamory and has never heard of such work. Even though neocortex size in primates has long been a specialty of his.

So that's the Daily Mail. The tabloids just make stuff up. Or they word things weasely so you think they're reporting a sourced fact, rather than just supposing that something maybe ought to be true ("opinion"). Their lawyers are skilled.


●  Another new book on the way: Polyamorous Elders: Aging in Open Relationships, by decades-long polyamory relationship counselor Kathy Labriola. It's due out December 15 from Rowman & Littlefield. You can preorder now. The publisher's blurb:


This book explores the unique group of elders, ages 55 and older, who practice some form of consensual nonmonogamy. It covers both the joys and challenges of multiple relationships for elders and explores how their relationships develop and evolve. Polyamorous elders have the complexities of juggling multiple relationships, as well as navigating all the issues of aging: managing medical conditions and disabilities (their own and/or their partners’); assuming caregiving responsibilities for aging relatives; grieving the deaths of parents, siblings, and partners; retiring from careers and starting new lives; and potentially moving into some form of senior living.

Drawing from her extensive clinical and personal experience working with this population, Kathy Labriola provides anecdotes from polyamorous elders’ lives, including the constellation of relationships surrounding each individual, couple, or triad. This guide will help health care and mental health clinicians, researchers, and professionals, as well as polyamorous elders and their loved ones, better understand the concerns and diverse lifestyles of this population to better represent and support them.


Labriola has posted,


There are chapters on poly elders care taking for spouses, lovers, and aging relatives, as well as mourning partners -- and metamours in a poly context. There is also a chapter on end of life planning, wills, advanced directives, etc., for poly people.


Her previous books are Love in Abundance (2010), The Jealousy Workbook (2013), and The Polyamory Breakup Book (2019). 

BTW, Some interesting elder research:  The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults (Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 30(1), January 2015), by James Fleckenstein and Derrell Cox II. From the abstract:


...The authors collected 502 responses via an online survey from individuals aged 55 and older residing in the United States who engage in consensually non-exclusive sexual relationships. Self-reported health and happiness, number of sexual partners, and sexual frequency were compared with 723 similar respondents from the nationally-representative 2012 United States (US) General Social Survey.

Key findings were: Irrespective of formal relationship status, the non-exclusive sample reported significantly more sexual partners, more sexual frequency, better health, and were much more likely to have had an HIV test than the general US population; the non-exclusive sample also reported being significantly happier than the general population, with the exception of married men, who reported being as happy as the general population sample.... 



------------------------------------------------------

And to repeat...

Why have I been ending posts to this polyamory news site with Ukraine?

Because I've seen many progressive movements become irrelevant and die out by failing to scan the wider world correctly and understand their position in it strategically.

We polyamorous people are a small, weird minority of social-rule breakers. Some increasingly powerful  people call us a threat to society — because by living successfully outside their worldview, we expose its incompleteness. Our freedom to choose our relationship structures, and to speak up for ourselves about the truth of ourselves, is just one way we depend on a free and pluralistic society that respects people's dignity to create their own lives, to access facts, and to speak of what they know.

The Russian family-cartoon series Masyanya
turned dissident. Watch. The cartoonist has fled.
Update: a sequel of turnabout, and a
message of empathy in wartime. 
 
Such a society is only possible where people have power to govern themselves, combined with legal structures that are at least supposed to guarantee the rights of all.

People, communities, and societies who create their own lives, and who insist on the democratic structures and legal rights that enable them to do so safely, infuriate and terrify the authoritarians who are growing in power around the world and in our own United States.

Such rulers and would-be rulers seek to stamp out other people's freedom to choose their lives — by intimidation, repressive laws, inflammatory disinformation and public incitement, or, eventually, artillery.

For what it's worth, this site has received more pagereads from Ukraine over the years (56,400) than from any other country in eastern Europe.

For now, you can donate to Ukraine relief through this list of organizations, or many others. We're giving to a big one, Razom, and to a little one, Pizza for Ukraine in Kharkiv, a project of an old friend of my wife.

----------------------------------

But that is only the start. For those of us born since World War II, this is the most consequential war of our lifetimes.

The coming times are going to require hard things of us. We don't get to choose the time and place in history we find ourselves born into. We do get to choose how we respond to it. Buck up and be ready.

Need a little help bucking up? Play thisAnother version, on the streets of Kherson after its liberation November 11. More? Just some guys in Kharkiv (our Pizza for Ukraine town) helping to hold onto a free and open society, a shrinking thing in the world. The tossed grenade seems to have saved them. Maybe your granddad did this across a trench from Hitler's troops — for you, and for us,  because a world fascist movement was successfully defeated that time, opening the way for the rest of the 2oth century. Although the outcome didn't look good for a couple of years there.

Remember, these people say they're doing it for us too. They are correct.  The global struggle between a free, open future and a fearful revival of the dark past that's shaping up, including in our own country, is still in its early stages. The situation is likely to get worse before it gets better. The outcome is again uncertain, and it will determine the 21st century and the handling of all its other problems.

----------------------------------

PS: Ukraine should not be idealized as the paragon of an open democratic society. For instance, see If Ukraine Wants To Stand for Liberty and Democracy, It Should Rethink Some of Its Wartime Policies. And the country had quite a history of being run by corrupt oligarchs — until the Maidan Uprising of 2013, the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and Zelensky's overwhelming election in 2019 as the anti-corruption candidate. So they're working on that.

Now, writes US war correspondent George Packer in The Atlantic (Sept. 7),   


Here was a country with a tragic history that had at last begun to build, with great effort, a better society. What made Ukraine different from any other country I had ever seen—certainly from my own—was its spirit of constant self-improvement, which included frank self-criticism. For example, there’s no cult of Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine—a number of Ukrainians told me that he had made mistakes, that they’d vote against him after the war was won. Maxim Prykupenko, a hospital director in Lviv, called Ukraine “a free country aspiring to be better all the time.” The Russians, he added, “are destroying a beautiful country for no logical reason to do it. Maybe they are destroying us just because we have a better life.”


They have a word there, with a deep history, for the horizontal, self-organized mutual get-it-done that grows from community social trust: hromada. Learn that word. It's getting them through as well as they've been able. We polyfolks often dream of creating something like that community spirit in miniature, in our polycules and networks. Occasionally we succeed.

Social attitudes in Ukraine are generally traditional, but not bitterly so like often in the US; the ideal of modern European civil society is widely treasured, and social progressivism has room to thrive. More than 40,000 women volunteers reportedly serve all roles in the armed forces, including as combat officers, platoon leadersartillery gunners, tankers, and snipers. LGBT folx in the armed forces openly wear symbols of LGBT pride on their uniforms, whereas in Russia it can be a crime for even a civilian to show a rainbow pin. Writes kos in the big lefty news site Daily Kos (July 29),


I find [this] particularly salient given American conservative hostility toward women serving in our military. People like Ted Cruz praising the supposed manliness of the Russian army, while claiming ours is weak because of “woke culture.” Ukraine puts that bullshit to bed, not just with the women serving in its ranks, but with gay soldiers very publicly sewing unicorn patches on their uniforms to denote their pride.


He retweets a meme from a military blogger on the well-documented plight of abused gay Russian draftees:



To hell with any conservatives who impugn anyone’s service as somehow less effective or honorable than white straight men. 


_________________________
 Don't miss Polyamory in the News!
 SUBSCRIBE by a feed, or
 SUBSCRIBE by email

_________________________

[Permalink]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,